* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [00:00:01] THE [Call to Order ] TIME IS NOW 6:00 PM OUR REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR JUNE 4TH, 2024 IS NOW IN SESSION. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS WILL LEAD US WITH THE OPENING PRAYER AND THE PLEDGES OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAGS OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE STATE OF TEXAS. PLEASE RISE PURITY OF INTENTION AS WE WORK TOGETHER FOR THE BETTERMENT OF OUR CITY. MAY OUR ACTIONS TODAY REFLECT THE VALUES OF JUSTICE, EQUALITY, AND HARMONY, AND MAY THEY CONTRIBUTE TO THE FLOURISHING OF ALL WHO DWELL WITHIN THESE BORDERS. IN YOUR NAME WE PRAY, AMEN. AMEN. PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE. FOR HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG, I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. ALRIGHT, [Presentations] WE HAVE A PRESENTATION, THE BONG ISSUANCE TIMELINE PRESENTATION, UM, MR. WALTERS. ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. MY NAME IS JAMES WALTERS. I'M THE FINANCE DIRECTOR HERE FOR THE CITY OF SHIRTZ. AS WE APPROACH THE TIME WHO WE CAN CONSIDER ISSUING, UH, NEW BONDS AND DEBTED PROJECTS, UH, WE'RE COMING BEFORE YOU TODAY WITH THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM SAMCO TO GO OVER THE TIMELINE, UH, THAT WE WOULD'VE TO FOLLOW IF WE WANTED TO ISSUE ANY, UH, MONIES, AS WELL AS KINDA GIVE YOU A PREVIEW OF THE, UM, THE AMOUNTS WE'RE LOOKING FOR AND WHAT KIND OF PROJECTS WE'D BE IN. SO FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE, UH, ANDREW FRIEDMAN WITH SAMCO TO KINDA GO OVER THE TIMELINE AND THE PROCESS OF WHAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANDREW FRIEDMAN WITH SAMCO CAPITAL MARKETS, UH, GOT THE PLEASURE OF SERVING AS THE CITY'S FINANCIAL ADVISOR WHEN IT COMES TO ISSUING DEBT. UH, AS MR. WALTERS, UH, ALLUDED TO IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET, THERE IS A TIMETABLE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION AS WELL AS A TAX RATE IMPACT ANALYSIS. UH, THE, THIS IS THE TIME OF YEAR, UH, YOU'RE WORKING THROUGH YOUR BUDGET, WORKING TOWARDS SETTING YOUR TAX RATE, UH, FOR NEXT YEAR. UH, AND IN ORDER TO LE A TAX RATE TO REPAY A NEW DEBT, YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOLD THAT DEBT AND IT HAS TO BE OUTSTANDING BEFORE YOU ADOPT YOUR TAX RATE IN EARLY SEPTEMBER. UH, IN ORDER TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONS, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE NEW TO THE COUNCIL, UH, WE HAVE TO START THE PROCESS, THE FIRST LEGAL STEP BY AUTHORIZING WHAT'S KNOWN AS A NOTICE OF INTENTION RESOLUTION. UH, ACCORDING TO THIS TIMETABLE, UH, SHOULD YOU ALL WISH TO PROCEED WITH THE PROCESS THAT WOULD BE BROUGHT TO YOU ALL ON JULY 2ND, 46 DAYS AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THAT NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE DEBT IN YOUR PAPER OF RECORD, THE CITY IS THEN IN A POSITION TO ENTERTAIN BIDS AND AUTHORIZE THE SALE OF THOSE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION. SO THAT'S THE, UH, PROCESS FOR ISSUING COS YOU ADOPT A RESOLUTION THAT ALERTS THE PUBLIC YOUR INTENTION TO BORROW MONEY AND STATES THE AMOUNT, UH, THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT FOR THAT BORROWING, UH, THE PROJECTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THAT FINANCING THAT THE MONEY CAN BE SPENT ON. AND THEN OUTLINES THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING WHERE YOU ALL WILL TAKE OFFICIAL ACTION AND AWARD THE SALE OF THOSE COS, WHICH WOULD BE, UH, ON, UH, SEPTEMBER 3RD, UH, AHEAD OF SETTING YOUR TAX RATE. AND THEN FUNDS DELIVERED ON OCTOBER 2ND. DURING THAT TIME, CITY WOULD GO THROUGH A BOND RATING REVIEW PROCESS WITH STANDARD AND POS, UH, PUT THAT OFFERING DOCUMENT OUT AND WOULD PROPOSE TO SELL THIS, UH, ON EITHER A COMPETITIVE OR NEGOTIATED UNDERWRITING BASIS, AND THEN BRING THE, UH, RESULTS OF THAT ON SEPTEMBER 3RD TO YOU ALL FOR YOUR APPROVAL SO YOU'RE NOT AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ENCUMBERING THE CITY UNTIL THAT SEPTEMBER 3RD DATE. UH, THE PROJECTS, UH, FOR THIS PROPOSED ISSUANCE, $20 MILLION, UH, FOR SOME VARIOUS ROAD PROJECTS THAT WOULD BE PAID FOR FROM THE INTEREST IN SINKING PORTION OF YOUR TAX RATE. I WON'T GO THROUGH THIS IN EXCRUCIATING DETAIL, ALTHOUGH I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER EVERY SINGLE QUESTION THAT YOU HAVE. THIS TAX RATE IMPACT ANALYSIS LOOKS AT THE CITY'S ABILITY TO REPAY ANY NEW DEBT AND WHAT THE IMPACT WOULD BE ON YOUR FUTURE INTEREST IN SINKING PORTION OF YOUR TAX RATE. THE YEAR THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY IN AND COMING TO THE END OF, UH, WE ARE LEVY A 15.48 CENT INS TAX RATE. THIS NEW DEBT, BOTH THE $20 MILLION THAT WE'RE CONSIDERING FOR ISSUANCE THIS SUMMER, AS WELL AS A POTENTIAL FUTURE ISSUANCE IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS OR SO OF AN ADDITIONAL $40 MILLION [00:05:01] WOULD BE ABLE TO BE ISSUED WITHOUT INCREASING FROM THE EXISTING INTEREST IN SINKING TAX RATE. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. WHAT YOU'RE BITING OFF RIGHT NOW, SO TO SPEAK, IS $20 MILLION FOR ROAD BONDS WITH THE POTENTIAL TO ISSUE MORE DEBT DOWN THE ROAD, UH, AS ONE YOU CONTINUE TO GROW AND TWO, YOUR EXISTING DEBT CONTINUES TO BE REPAID. UH, WE CAN LAYER IN NEW DEBT FOR NEW PROJECTS THAT YOU ALL WISH TO UNDERTAKE. UH, AND SO THAT'S THE BASIS OF THIS. UH, THE ANALYSIS IS UNDERPINNED BY ASSUMING A VERY MODEST AMOUNT OF GROWTH, 3.5% OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE ASSUMING THAT WE'RE NOT GONNA GROW AT ALL, UH, INTO THE FUTURE. AND THAT'S NOT REALISTICALLY EXPECT THAT YOU'LL CONTINUE TO GROW CERTAINLY, UM, OUT OR ABOVE THE PACE OF INFLATION. BUT THIS ALLOWS, UH, THE CITY TO BE IN A POSITION TO ISSUE DEBT, SET A TAX RATE IN A VERY CONSERVATIVE, UH, STANCE SO THAT YOU DON'T, UH, RUN INTO AN ISSUE WHERE YOUR TAX RATE IS INCREASING, EVEN IF YOU'RE NOT ISSUING MORE DEBT IN THE FUTURE. UH, SO WE WANT TO BE, UH, WE WANT TO BE VERY CONSERVATIVE IN THAT, UH, APPROACH. UH, AND SO THIS IS REALLY KIND OF A WORST CASE SCENARIO, BUT IT SHOWS THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO INCREASE THE TAX RATE FOR THESE $60 MILLION OF PROJECTS OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS. SO WITH THAT, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY AND ALL QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. UH, MR. WILLIAMS, IF I'VE LEFT ANYTHING OUT THAT YOU'D LIKE FOR ME TO COVER, I'M CERTAINLY HAPPY TO. I THINK YOU COVERED IT VERY WELL, SIR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MR. FREEMAN. UH, COUNSEL QUESTIONS. I SEE NO QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. YOU'RE VERY WELL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, WE'LL [City Events and Announcements] MOVE ON THEN. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF UPCOMING EVENTS. MS. GONZALEZ. APOLOGIZE. THAT'S ME. UM, OKAY. SO ON FRIDAY, JUNE 7TH, UM, IT'LL BE THE FIRST MOVIES IN THE PARK. IT'LL BE IN THE MOVIE TROLLS BAND, TOGETHER AT HERITAGE OAKS PARK. THE EVENT BEGINS AT 8:00 PM AND THE MOVIE WILL BEGIN AT DUSK ON SATURDAY, JUNE 8TH IS THE NATURE DISCOVERY SERIES. DISCOVER FANTASTIC FROGS AT 9:30 AM AT CRESCENT BEND NATURE PARK. ANOTHER MOVIE'S IN THE PARK ON FRIDAY, JUNE 14TH. IT'LL BE THE SUPER MARIO BROTHERS MOVIE AT ASHLEY PARK. AND AGAIN, IT, UH, THE EVENT BEGINS AT EIGHT, THE MOVIE WILL START AT DUSK. AND FINALLY ON TUESDAY, JUNE 18TH. OUR NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL BE BACK HERE AT SIX O'CLOCK. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, ANNOUNCEMENTS OF RECOGNITIONS BY OUR CITY MANAGER, MR. WILLIAMS. THANK YOU MAYOR, THAT GET TO DO ONE OF MY FAVORITE THINGS. TALK ABOUT THE PROMOTIONS. FOR THE LAST MONTH, WE HAD SEVERAL AND, UH, THIS IS JUST A, A, A GOOD EXEMPLIFICATION OF, OF OUR FOLKS RISING UP THROUGH THE RANKS AND, UH, BECOMING A EVEN A MORE CRITICAL PART OF OUR ORGANIZATION. SO IN, WE HAD CODY RAINS WAS PROMOTED FROM CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TO BUILDING INSPECTOR ROBERT WALKER WAS PROMOTED FROM ASSOCIATE ENGINEER TO ENGINEER FRANK ROSAS PROMOTED FROM CADET TO POLICE. OFFICER ANDY COOK WENT FROM PART-TIME PARAMEDIC TO FULL-TIME PARAMEDIC. TYLER WARNKE, UH, WENT FROM EMT TO PARAMEDIC. DANIEL ARIS WENT FROM WATER WASTEWATER WORKER ONE TO WATER WASTEWATER. NUMBER TWO, BEN RANTZ PROMOTED FROM WATER WASTEWATER ONE TO WATER WASTEWATER WORKER. TWO, RICHARD GOMEZ, UH, PROMOTED FROM METER TECHNICIAN TO CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. AND JASON ICK WENT FROM PARAMEDIC TO EMS, LIEUTENANT DARIEN TROTTER WENT FROM EMS LI, UH, PARAMEDIC TO UMS, LIEUTENANT AND TYLER WILSON PROMOTED FROM PARAMEDIC TO, UH, EMS LIEUTENANT AS WELL. SO PROUD ALL THOSE FOLKS FOR, FOR STEPPING UP TO THE NEXT LEVEL. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, ANNOUNCEMENTS AND RECOGNITIONS BY THE MAYOR. UH, I JUST WANNA SAY PASS ALONG OUR CONGRATULATIONS TO OUR CITY STAFF ON THEIR PROMOTIONS. NEXT ON THE [Hearing of Residents] AGENDA IS THE HEARING OF RESIDENTS. THIS TIME IS SET ASIDE FOR ANY PERSON WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. EACH PERSON IS LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. AND WE ASK BEFORE ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. NOW. THERE IS SEVERAL PUBLIC HEARINGS ON OUR AGENDA HERE TONIGHT. SO YOU DO HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MAY SPEAK AT THE HEARING, THE RESIDENCE, OR YOU MAY HOLD OFF UNTIL THE PUBLIC HEARING OR YOU CAN SPEAK AT BOTH. THE OPTION IS YOURS. MAYOR PRO TEMP, PLEASE CALL FIRST SPEAKER DANIEL JAMESON. GOOD EVENING MAYOR CITY COUNCIL. AND ON BEHALF OF THE VFW POST 83 15, I WANNA THANK YOU FOR THOSE WHO CAME OUT FOR THE MEMORIAL DAY EVENT OVER THERE IN SLO. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT, YOU KNOW, WE NOT ONLY RECOGNIZE OUR VETERANS FOR THE SACRIFICES THEY GIVE, BUT OUR FIRST RESPONDERS ARE LIKE THE POLICE AND FIRE EMS, [00:10:01] YOU KNOW, THEY ALSO ARE ON THE FRONT LINES FIGHTING FOR OUR FREEDOM HERE IN THE COMMUNITY AS WELL AS OVERSEAS. AND WITH THE 4TH OF JULY COMING UP, YOU KNOW, WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE CITY RESIDENTS INVOLVED WITH THE VFW AND WORKING WITH US ON ANY EVENTS AND ALL EVENTS THAT MAY COME BETWEEN OR COME WITH BOTH CITY AND THE VFW. I KNOW SOME OF Y'ALL HAVE SERVED IN THE MILITARY, SO WE DEFINITELY WOULD LIKE FOR YOU GUYS TO, YOU KNOW, POP IN AND SAY, HI, OUR POST IS OPEN. YOU CAN'T MISS US. WE'RE THE ONLY ONE THAT'S GOT A TANK OUT FRONT AND A HOWITZER. SO OVER HERE ON 78. BUT PLEASE, YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY COME OUT, BE A PART THE 4TH OF JULY JAMBOREE THE, UM, VETERANS DAY EVENTS THAT'S COMING UP IN, UH, NOVEMBER. YOU KNOW, LET'S GET OUT AND SHOW OUR SUPPORT AS A COMMUNITY OF SHIRTS THAT I GREW UP IN TO, YOU KNOW, AND BE A PART OF THE EVENTS THAT HAPPENED WITH THE VFW. WE, IT'S CALLED VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS, EVEN THOUGH WE SERVED OVERSEAS, BUT WE'RE STILL AT WAR. JUST LOOK AT THE NEWS, LISTEN TO IT. IT'S ALL ON THE, YOU KNOW, EVERY DAY IS A WAR, WHETHER YOU REALIZE IT OR NOT. FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. THANK YOU. TRACY CAMPOS. UH, MY NAME IS TRACY CAMPOS. I LIVE AT 1 2 3 4 0 SCHAFER ROAD. UM, AND IT'S ABOUT ITEM ONE 20 AT PUBLIC HEARING, AND IT'S ABOUT THE REZONING. AND I'LL DO 'EM BOTH IF I HAVE TO READ 'EM TWICE. UM, I LIVE WITH MY FATHER, WHO HE'S 94 YEARS OLD. HE WAS BORN IN THAT HOUSE ON SCHAEFER ROAD. WE ARE AGAINST THE ZONING CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO R TWO. WE DON'T THINK IT'S IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY. IF THE HOMESTEADERS WANNA SELL THEIR AGRICULTURAL PROPERTIES, THEY SHOULD BE, THEN IT SHOULD BE UP TO THE DEVELOPERS AND TO BRING THEIR PLANS TO THE CITY AT THE TIME TO REQUEST ZONING FOR THEIR VISION ACCORDING TO CITY INFRASTRUCTURE AND POLICY. AND IF THE CITY GOES AHEAD AND ZONES IT, R TWO, YOU'RE GONNA LOSE OUT ON, YOU KNOW, UP TO $6,000 A PARCEL BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO PAY THE FEES IN ORDER TO REZONE. SO IT MAKES NO SENSE TO ZONE 'EM NOW. AND IT MAKES THE PROPERTY OWNERS FEEL THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO FORCE THEM OUT INTO REZONING THEIR PROPERTIES THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO MAKE THEM SELL TO A DEVELOPER. THE CITY DOESN'T HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE. I KNOW THERE'S A INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SHIRTS AND SLO, BUT WE SEE SLO FIRE TRUCKS GO BY, YOU KNOW, AT LEAST WEEKLY TO GO TO SHIRTS. THEY'RE WHERE WE'RE AT. IT'S A MILE AND A HALF TO SHIRTS, FIRE STATION THREE AND SLO FIRE STATION ONE. BUT YET WE CONSTANTLY SEE SLO FIRETRUCK COMING TO HELP SHIRTS. SO WE KNOW THE INFRASTRUCTURE'S NOT IN PLACE. WE HAVE THE 18 WHEELERS GOING DOWN RAF BURNETT, AND IT BACKS UP TRAFFIC BECAUSE THEY'RE HOLDING UP TRAFFIC. THERE'S HUNDREDS OF 18 WHEELERS GOING ALL WEEK LONG, MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY START BEFORE 7:00 AM THE STREETS ARE NOT DESIGNED FOR THIS INFRASTRUCTURE. AND THERE'S SUBDIVISIONS THAT ARE TRYING TO GO IN THERE, AND WE ARE DEAD SET AGAINST ALL OF THEM. THE SH SCHAFER ROAD WAS NOT DESIGNED FOR THAT. LOWER SINE IS NOT DESIGNED FOR IT, AND YET Y'ALL ARE TRYING TO DO THAT, BUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS NOT IN PLACE. I MEAN, Y'ALL ARE HURRYING UP TO BUILD ANOTHER WATER STORAGE FACILITY GROUND. YOU'VE GOT AN ELEVATED AND NOW YOU'RE DOING A GROUND. SO IT SHOULD BE THAT YOU HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN PLACE BEFORE YOU TRY AND REZONE ALL THE PROPERTIES DOWN TO AN R TWO. THANK YOU MARTY FRIESEN HUN. MY NAME'S MARTY FRIESAN, 22 900 OLD NACODOCHES ROAD, UH, NEW BRAUNFELS 7 8 1 3 2. UM, MY COMMENTS ARE REALLY, I'VE BEEN HERE A COUPLE OF TIMES AND SO MY COMMENTS JUST, IT'S ON THE REZONING TODAY ON THE, I BELIEVE IT'S ITEM ONE 19 AS THERE'S A NUMBER OF 'EM ON HERE. UH, WE HAVE, I HAVE FOUR PARCELS, UM, THAT ARE, UH, BEING REZONED TO, OR BEING ANNEXED ACTUALLY AND REZONED TO GENERAL BUSINESS. AND THEN, THEN I HAVE AN ADJACENT PROPERTY THAT IS, UM, I BELIEVE JUST A SMALL LANE. IT'S LIKE A HALF ACRE AND IT'S LIKE RESIDENTIAL OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND THEN PROPERTY ACROSS FROM US IS ACTUALLY BEING REZONED FROM PRE-DEVELOPMENT, I THINK TO RESIDENTIAL AG OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO, WHICH REALLY DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE TO ME, BUT I GUESS TO ME IT'S BETTER THAN THE HAVING A BUSINESS. UM, SO ANYWAYS, MY COMMENTS ARE KIND OF ABOUT SERVICES REALLY. UM, YOU KNOW, FIRST OF ALL, I'M NOT REALLY FOR, I'M DEFINITELY [00:15:01] NOT FOR THE ANNEXATION OR THE REZONING, ANY OF THAT PART OF IT, BUT I KNOW IT'S MOVING FORWARD. SO IT LOOKS LIKE, YOU KNOW, THERE'S REALLY NO CHOICE IN THE MATTER, BUT I JUST WANTED TO PROVIDE SOME COMMENTS FOR YOU TO THINK ABOUT AS FAR AS SERVICES AND WHAT HAPPENS DOWN THE ROAD. UM, ONE OF THE THINGS ON THERE, ON OUR AREA, IN OUR AREA, IT'S ALREADY BEEN ANNEXED OF COURSE, AS FAR AS THE ROAD BEHIND US, THERE'S TWO ROADS THAT ARE CLOSE TO US. ONE IS 22,900, OR THERE'S, WELL THAT'S MY ADDRESS, BUT MY OLD NACODOCHES ROAD NEXT TO IT, THE, UH, TRUCK TRAFFIC IS, IS JUST HORRENDOUS. AND THE ROADS ARE JUST AWFUL. SO THERE'S ALSO FREEZING ON LANE, WHICH HAS BEEN ANNEXED FOR A LONG TIME. AND IF THAT'S THE METHOD OF, YOU KNOW, MAINTAINING ROADS FOR THE CITY, THEN YOU KNOW, I, YOU KNOW, THAT DOESN'T EVEN MAKE SENSE TO ME. SO I GUESS MY REAL COMMENTS ARE IF, IF YOU'RE WILLING TO ANNEX THESE PROPERTIES, YOU KNOW, I KNOW THERE'S A NUMBER OF THEM, YOU KNOW, PLEASE MAKE, IF YOU'RE GONNA DO THAT, YOU GOTTA BE WILLING TO PROVIDE THOSE SERVICES. SO WHAT SERVICES ARE WE GONNA GET? AND JUST TALKING TO NEIGHBORS AND STUFF THAT HAVE BEEN ANNEXED SO FAR, THEY DON'T SEEM TO GET THOSE SERVICES. AND THEN THERE'S THIS LOOPHOLE ABOUT NOTHING IN THIS PLAN SHOULD REQUIRE THE CITY TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM LEVEL OF MUNICIPAL SERVICE TO EACH AREA OF THE CITY, INCLUDING THE ANNEXED AREAS. AND, UM, IF DIFFERENT TOPOGRAPHY, LAND USE AND POPULATION DENSITY, THEN YOU KNOW, YOU DON'T HAVE TO PROVIDE THAT SERVICE. WELL, MY THING IS, IF WE'RE GONNA HAVE TO PAY TAXES, THEN THAT'S GONNA BE THE THING. THEN WE NEED TO HAVE THOSE SERVICES. SO, UM, AGAIN, I'M NOT FOR THE ANNEXATION. WE'VE BEEN AGRICULTURE FOREVER. I KNOW THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDED IN THE UNIFIED CODE TO ALLOW US TO, UM, DO SOME THINGS WITH OUR BUILDINGS AND AGRICULTURE USES THAT WEREN'T IN THERE ORIGINALLY. SO THAT'S GOOD. BUT IT ALSO HAS A LOOPHOLE THAT WHETHER IT CAN BE CHANGED ANY TIME. SO MY THING IS, IF YOU'RE GONNA HAVE THAT IN THERE, LET'S KEEP IT IN THERE. AND IF WE'RE GONNA GET ANNEXED, LET'S PROVIDE THE SERVICES. LET'S MAINTAIN THE ROADS LIKE ANY OTHER PART OF THE CITY, RIGHT? 'CAUSE I MEAN, JUST 'CAUSE THESE TWO ROADS ARE OUT THERE AND, YOU KNOW, AND SO-CALLED NOLAND'S LAND, NO MAN'S LAND, YOU KNOW, THEY SHOULD BE MAINTAINED AS WELL. AND THAT GOES FOR ALL THE OTHER SERVICES AS WELL. SO WITH THAT, I JUST WANT YOU TO CONSIDER THOSE THINGS AND THAT'S KINDA WHAT I HAVE TO SAY TONIGHT. THANK YOU. NO ONE ELSE LEFT ON THE LIST. ALRIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON THEN. NEXT ON THE AGENDA IS CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. OH, OH, HELLO, MY NAME IS ANDRES GONZALEZ. I LIVE AT 360 BIG JOHN LANE. AND MY, UH, I'D LIKE TO SPEAK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE REZONING. I DO APOLOGIZE. I, I'M A LITTLE BIT LATE. I HAVE MY CHILDREN OUTSIDE AND THEY DIDN'T WANNA DISTURB Y'ALL, SO I DECIDED TO COME IN. NOW. UM, I WANTED TO, I'M LIMITED ON TIME, SO AS, AS I'M SURE AS YOU ALL ARE, I'M SURE THAT YOU, BY NOW, IT'S OBVIOUS THAT YOU'RE GONNA GO, GO AHEAD AND DO THE REZONING AND THE ANNEXATION. I LIVE IN THE PARKLANDS AREA. THAT AREA USED TO BELONG, UH, BETWEEN ENG AND ECKARD. THE MAJORITY OF THE, UH, LAND THERE ACTUALLY USED TO BELONG TO OUR FAMILY. UH, FAMILY DIVIDED AND UH, SOLD THE LAND. AND NOW YOU'VE GOT ALL THESE DEVELOPMENTS. THERE WE'RE THE LAST PORTION I'VE GOT. UM, MY FAMILY, MY CHILDREN, MY WIFE AND MY OTHER CHILDREN, UM, OWN THE LAST 13 ACRES OF WHAT WAS ONCE OVER 400 ACRES. UM, WE'RE THE LAST REMAINING FAMILY MEMBERS THERE. AND I OPTED AT THE TIME, UM, TO COME BACK OUT AND LIVE AT THE LAND THINKING I WAS GONNA BE ABLE TO RAISE MY CHILDREN IN THE COUNTRY AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. UNFORTUNATELY, UM, WHEN WE MADE THE PROCESS OF GETTING THE LAND, IT WASN'T RECORDED, UH, BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE, AND THE COUNTY THAT THERE WAS AN ANNEXATION, UH, THING TO IT. SO WE BOUGHT THE LAND AND I STARTED THINKING I COULD BUILD. UH, LO AND BEHOLD, I FOUND OUT I COULDN'T. SO WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR THE ANNEXATIONS ON AND FORTH AND, UH, HAD A LOT OF DIFFERENT, UH, CHARACTERS GO OUT TO OUR LAND. DEVELOPERS, INVESTORS, SOME OF WHO HAVE, UH, CREATED OUR THREATEN OF LAWSUITS, UM, ON MY LAND. THEY'VE, UH, LANDLOCKED ME. THEY'VE DESTROYED MY, MY INGRESS AND RESS. EVERY SINGLE THING YOU CAN IMAGINE TO TRY TO FORCE US TO SELL. UM, I WILL NOT SELL. I WILL NOT SELL AS LONG AS MY CHILDREN ARE HAPPY THERE. SO NO MATTER WHAT IT IS, WHETHER IT'S THROUGH ANNEXATION, THROUGH CHANGING ZONING LAWS OR WHATEVER, THAT MAKES IT REALLY COMPLICATED ON US ON TAXES OR ME BEING ABLE TO BUILD SOMETHING AS, UH, SIMPLE AS A CLUBHOUSE FOR MY KIDS. UH, 'CAUSE I'VE BEEN TOLD THAT ANYTHING FROM EVEN HAVING MY GRASS A LITTLE BIT, UH, UH, LONGER THAN IT SHOULD, I HAVE COURSES, COURSE IS GONNA BE, UH, HIGHER THAN IT SHOULD. UH, BECAUSE NOW THEY HAVE HOAS AND I'VE EVEN BEEN TOLD THAT THERE'S WAYS THAT THEY CAN SEND SOMEONE, UH, TO CUT MY GRASS AND PUT A LIEN ON MY LAND, A MECHANICAL LIEN ON IT. SO, I MEAN, I'VE HEARD IT ALL, INCLUDING I HAD, UH, AN, UH, AN ATTORNEY THAT WENT OUT THERE THAT REPRESENTS A VERY BIG INVESTOR. [00:20:01] AND IT WAS TOLD OFF THE RECORD AT THAT MOMENT, UH, THAT THERE'S NOTHING I COULD DO BECAUSE THERE WAS PEOPLE WITHIN THE COUNCIL THAT WERE IN THEIR POCKETS. THOSE WERE HIS WORDS. AND HE SAID, I WILL NOT LOSE. HE, HE TOLD ME, HE'S LIKE, I WILL NOT LOSE WHEN I GO TO COURT. HE'S LIKE, WE GOT THE MONEY, YOU DON'T. AND I SAID, WELL, I'VE GOT THE TIME. THE PROBLEM IS THIS THOUGH, THAT HE'S PROBABLY RIGHT. HE MIGHT BE THE MICHAEL JORDAN OF HIS COURT, BUT I AM THE KING OF MY HOME. SO I KNOW IT'S NOT GONNA MAKE MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE. I'M WILLING TO SIT IT OUT AND PAY WHATEVER TAXES I HAVE TO OR WHATEVER HAPPENS. JUST WISH WE COULD, UH, PREVENT THE ANNEXATION, AT LEAST FROM MY PROPERTY. SO I'VE GOT KIDS TO RAISE THEIRS. THANK YOU. THANK, THANK YOU SIR. [Consent Agenda Items] ALRIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO CONSENT. AGENDA ITEMS. THESE ARE CONSIDERED SELF-EXPLANATORY AND INFORMATION PACKETS ARE PROVIDED TO THE COUNCIL AND AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC VIEWING. THESE ITEMS REQUIRE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION UNLESS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL, THERE'S ONLY ONE ITEM. MINUTES. AND COUNSEL, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE. SO MOVE. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. ANY COMMENTS? IF NOT, IF YOU COMPETE, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE, PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ALL RIGHT, [Closed Session] WE'LL MOVE ON TO A CLOSED SESSION. ITEM NUMBER TWO, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL MEET IN CLOSED SESSION UNDER SECTION 5 51 0.087 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENTAL CODE DELIBERATIONS REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS. CLOSED MEETING THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY IS NOW REQUIRED TO CONDUCT AN OPEN MEETING. ONE TO DISCUSS OR DELIBERATE REGARDING COMMERCIAL OR FINANCIAL INFORMATION THAT THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY HAS RECEIVED FROM A BUSINESS PROSPECT THAT THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY SEEKS TO HAVE LOCATES THEY EXPAND IN OR NEAR THE TERRITORY OF THE GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENTAL BODY, AND WITH WHICH THE GOVERNMENTAL BODY IS CONDUCTING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS. OR ITEM NUMBER TWO TO DELIBERATE AND OFFER OF FINANCIAL OR OTHER INCENTIVES TO A BUSINESS PROSPECT. THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO PROJECT E DASH 94. THE TIME IS NOW 6 22. WE WILL RECONVENE AFTER OUR CLOSED SESSION. [Reconvene into Regular Session] ALRIGHT, THE TIME IS NOW 6 41. WE RECONVENE AFTER OUR CLOSED SESSION. UH, OUR CLOSE, EXCUSE ME, OUR CLOSED SESSION STARTED AT 6 25. END TIME WAS 6 39. THERE IS A, UH, MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION RESOLUTION NUMBER 24 R 51, A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY, INSUREDS TEXAS, AUTHORIZING AN EXPENDITURE AS REFLECTED IN THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SHERTZ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND MILE HIGH SAN ANTONIO, LLC AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION. THEREWITH, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 24 SECOND R 51 MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO TEM MACALUSO AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON COUNCIL. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES ALL. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER FOUR, ORDINANCE NUMBER [Public Hearings] 24 S 20. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO PART THREE OF THE SHIRTS. CODE OF ORDINANCES, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE UDC TO ARTICLE SEVEN, NON-CONFORMING USES LOTS AND STRUCTURES TO ADD SECTION 21.7 POINT 11 AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. FIRST READING, MS. DELGADO. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR COUNSEL. THIS IS FOR ORDINANCE 24 S 20 A UDC AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE SEVEN. THE NONCONFORMING USES LOTS AND STRUCTURES. EMILY DELGADO, PLANNING MANAGER. SO SOME BACKGROUND AT THE APRIL 16TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESOLUTION 24 R 41 AND R 42 WERE DISCUSSED BY COUNCIL IN PAST STARTING THE ANNEXATION PROCESS FOR PROPERTIES IN COLE MOUNT GUADALUPE AND BEXAR COUNTY BASED ON EXPIRING DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. DURING THE DISCUSSION OF THOSE TWO RESOLUTIONS, CITY COUNCIL EXPRESSED CONCERNS ABOUT NON-CONFORMING USES AND PROTECTING AGRICULTURAL USES FOR PROPERTIES PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED. THE PROPOSED UDC AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE VII IS INTENDED TO RESOLVE THESE CONCERNS BY DEFINING AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS AND ENSURING THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO OPERATE IF THE PROPERTIES ARE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF SHIRTS. DUE TO HOUSE BILL 1750, WHICH WAS EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER, 2023, THE AGRICULTURAL CODE WAS EMITTED [00:25:01] TO REMOVE PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE EFFECT OF A CITY'S GOVERNMENTAL REQUIREMENTS ON AN AGRICULTURAL OPERATION THAT WAS SITUATED OUTSIDE THE CITY'S CORPORATE BOUNDARIES. AND THAT WAS LATER BROUGHT WITHIN THE CITY'S CORPORATE BOUNDARIES. ADDITIONALLY, HOUSE BILL 1750 FIND AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS AND PROVIDED GUIDANCE AND CLARITY TO CITIES ON GENERALLY ACCEPTED AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES THAT DO NOT POSE A THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH. THE DEFINITION OF AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS IN THE PROPOSED UDC AMENDMENT COMES DIRECTLY FROM HOUSE BILL 1750. THE PROPOSED UDC AMENDMENT TO ARTICLE VI WOULD BRING THE CITY OF SHIRTS IN LINE WITH RECENT CHANGES AND DEFINITIONS ESTABLISHED IN THE TEXAS AGRICULTURAL CODE. SO MOVING INTO THE ACTUAL PROPOSED UDC LANGUAGE. SO THIS WOULD BE AN ENTIRELY NEW SECTION WITHIN ARTICLE SEVEN TITLED SECTION 21 7 11, AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF SHIRTS, THERE EXIST PROPERTIES THAT HAVE BEEN UTILIZED FOR AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS PRIOR TO BEING ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF SHIRTZ AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS PER HOUSE BILL 1750 INCLUDE CULTIVATING THE SOIL PRODUCING CROPS OR GROWING VEGETATION FOR HUMAN FOOD, ANIMAL FEED, LIVESTOCK, FORAGE, FORAGE FOR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, PLANTING CEDAR FIBER, FLO CULTURE, VITICULTURE, HORTICULTURE, SILVICULTURE, WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, RAISING OR KEEPING LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY INCLUDING VETERINARY SERVICES, IMPLANTING COVER CROPS, OR LEAVING LAND IDLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PARTICIPATING IN ANY GOVERNMENTAL PROGRAM OR NORMAL CROP OF LIVESTOCK ROTATION PROCEDURES PER TEXAS AGRICULTURAL CODE CHAPTER 2 51, SECTION 2 51 0.0055. A CITY MAY NOT IMPOSE A GOVERNMENTAL REQUIREMENT THAT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY PROHIBITS THE USE OF A GENERALLY ACCEPTED AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE. SECTION B IN ORDER TO ENSURE THAT PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF SHIRTS THAT HAVE BEEN UTILIZED FOR AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS CAN CONTINUE THE FOLLOWING ARE APPLICABLE LAND USE PROPERTIES CAN BE UTILIZED FOR AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS, INCLUDING ALTERNATING BETWEEN GROWING CROPS AND RAISING LIVESTOCK. REGARDLESS OF THE ZONING DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY. B, EXPANSION OF AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS, EXISTING AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS CAN EXPAND TO INCLUDE INCREASE OF FIELD CROP AREA OR INCREASE OF LIVESTOCK OR CHANGE IN LIVESTOCK SPECIES CONSTRUCTION OF MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS OR EQUIPMENT SHEDS, BARNS, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, ANIMAL CAGES, CORRALS THEATERS, OR GRAIN STORAGE, OR ANY OTHER MISCELLANEOUS AGRICULTURAL RELATED STRUCTURE. ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS WILL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR ANY MAINTENANCE BUILDING OR EQUIPMENT SHEDS, BARN ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, ANIMAL CAGES, CORRALS THEATERS, OR GRAIN STORAGE, OR ANY OTHER MISCELLANEOUS AGRICULTURAL RELATED STRUCTURE THAT IS LESS THAN 2000 SQUARE FEET. PLOTTING IN THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER WILL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AGAIN, MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT SHEDS, BARN ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, ANIMAL CAGES, CORRALS FEEDERS, OR GRAIN STORAGE. NUMBER THREE, THIS DOES NOT NEGATE THE REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN ANY NECESSARY BUILDING PERMITS OR AN OR ANY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS FOR A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS THAT WILL BE OCCUPIED BY OR SERVES THOSE THAT DO NOT OWN OR WORK FOR THE AGRICULTURAL OPERATION. CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL ONLY BE UTILIZED FOR FAMILY MEMBERS OR EMPLOYEES OF THE AGRICULTURAL OPERATION ON THE SAME PROPERTY, WITH A MINIMUM OF FIVE ACRES PER UNIT UP TO AN ADDITIONAL FOUR UNITS PER PROPERTY ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. PLOTTING OF THE PROPERTY IN CONNECTION TO SANITARY SEWER WILL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS. CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OR REPAIR OF EXISTING AGRICULTURAL FENCING IN CONJUNCTION WITH AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS, INCLUDING UTILIZING BARBED WIRE IS PERMITTED WITHOUT OBTAINING A BUILDING PERMIT AS LONG AS THE PROPOSED FENCING IS WITHIN THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES AND DOES NOT IMPEDE SITE VISIBILITY. AND THEN C DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO ALL CITY ASSURANCES DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND PROCESSES TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PLATTING SITE PLAN, BUILDING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED WITHIN THIS SECTION. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT UDC AMENDMENTS, WE LOOK TO UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 21 4 7 D, WHICH IS THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. AND THERE'S A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS THAT, UM, STAFF OUTLINES. SO NUMBER ONE, THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT PROMOTES THE HEALTH, SAFETY OR GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY AND THE SAFE, ORDERLY, EFFICIENT, AND HELPFUL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY BY DEFINING AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. IN ARTICLE SEVEN, THE CITY IS ABLE TO ESTABLISH A CLEAR PROCEDURE MOVING FORWARD ON HOW AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS CAN CONTINUE OPERATIONS AS A NON-CONFORMING USE. ADDITIONALLY, STAFF UTILIZE THE DEFINITION OF AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS FROM HOUSEHOLD NUMBER 1750 THAT STRENGTHENED AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. NUMBER TWO, AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXAS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES OF THE UDC AND THE CITY. THE AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE VII ARE MEANT TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE EXISTING AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS THAT HAVE BECOME NONCONFORMING TO ENSURE THAT THE CITY DOES NOT IMPOSE GOVERNMENTAL REQUIREMENTS THAT PROHIBIT AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE PER STATE LAW. NUMBER THREE, ANY PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE UDC AND THE CITY. THE UDC AND ITS AMENDMENT SHOULD PROTECT, PROMOTE, IMPROVE, AND PROVIDE FOR THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND GENERAL WELFARE OF ITS CITIZENS, WHILE ALSO ENSURING THE SAFE, ORDERLY AND [00:30:01] EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT AND EXPANSION OF THE CITY. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLE VII ALLOW AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS TO CONTINUE ON NON-CONFORMING PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY ASSURES. AND THEN NUMBER FOUR, OTHER CRITERIA, WHICH AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL ARE DEEMED RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT. STAFF HAS ENSURED THAT THE UDC REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET FOR THE PROPOSED UDC AMENDMENT AND AT THIS TIME HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FROM P AND Z OR THE CITY COUNCIL STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 S 20 AMENDING PART THREE OF THE'S CODE OF ORDINANCES, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE SEVEN, SPECIFICALLY TO ADD ARTICLE SECTION 21 7 11 AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MET ON MAY 8TH AND MADE A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL WITH DISCUSS MODIFICATIONS FOR CLARITY ON WHEN A BUILDING PERMIT WAS NECESSARY AND THE UTILIZATION OF BARBED WIRE WITH THE FIVE TO TWO VOTE. AND THOSE CONSIDERATIONS HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE UDC AMENDMENT LANGUAGE THAT'S PROPOSED TONIGHT. THANK YOU MS. DI, MS. DELGADO. ALL RIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO, UH, DISCU WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS TOPIC WITH COUNSEL? THE MICS AVAILABLE AND YOU CAN PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS MARK PENN SHORN. I LIVE AT 83 20 TRAINER HALE ROAD AND I'VE SPOKEN TO YOU GUYS MANY TIMES BEFORE. GOOD EVENING. I WOULD LIKE TO ENCOURAGE COUNSEL TO PASS THE AFOREMENTIONED AMENDMENT AS IT WILL GREATLY, UM, IMPROVE THOSE OF US WHO ARE ENGAGED IN AGRICULTURE, IMPROVE OUR LIVES SIGNIFICANTLY SINCE WE HAVE NO CHOICE APPARENTLY TO BE OTHER THAN BEING ANNEXED BY THE CITY. SO I WOULD ENCOURAGE ALL OF YOU TO TAKE THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF AND PASS THIS. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS IT? COUNSEL, HELLO AGAIN. UH, ANDRES GONZALEZ, 360 BIG JOHN LANE. I WANT TO THANK YOU ALL FOR ACTUALLY TAKING THE CONSIDERATION. UM, AND HOPEFULLY Y'ALL WILL PASS THE AMENDMENT. UH, I DO KNOW THAT WE'RE GONNA BE ANNEXED. SO I AGREE WITH THE GENTLEMEN. IT WILL MAKE OUR LIVES A LOT EASIER. UH, ESPECIALLY SIMPLE THINGS AS BARBED WIRE AND STUFF LIKE THAT. I MEAN, WITH THE ANIMALS THAT WE HAVE, I MEAN IT'S, IT'S COMMON SENSE TYPE OF, UH, UH, YOU KNOW, AMENDMENTS LIKE THAT WOULD REALLY, REALLY HELP US, ESPECIALLY FOR FAMILIES THAT HAVE BEEN IN THE INDUSTRY FOR, YOU KNOW, OVER A HUNDRED YEARS. I THINK WE KIND OF KNOW WHAT WE'RE DOING SOMEWHAT, SO I WOULD APPRECIATE, UH, YOU WHAT TO CONSIDER THAT AND HOPEFULLY PASS THE AMENDMENT. IT WOULD GREATLY HELP US. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, ANYONE ELSE? GOING ONCE? GOING TWICE. ALRIGHT, PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL FOR FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE GORDON'S 24 S DASH 20. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF NOT, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ALL RIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER FIVE. ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 S 26. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MIXED USE SELF STORAGE IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT GB ON APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF FM 30 0 9 AND FOREST RIDGE. MORE SPECIFIC, MORE SPECIFICALLY KNOWN AS A PORTION OF GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 0 5 0 6 CITY OF ASSURES GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. MS. MARCUS FLOOR IS YOURS. GOOD EVENING COUNCIL MAYOR MR. WILLIAMS ORDINANCE 24 S 26 SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MIXED USE SELF STORAGE IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND ON APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES, DAISY MARQUEZ PLANNER. SO HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLINED IN GREEN. THIS IS FM 3 0 0 9, ALSO KNOWN AS ROY RICHARD. UM, I 35, UH, ACCESS ROAD IS THIS WAY H OUR HEB IS OVER HERE, UM, IN THIS CORNER. SO HERE IS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AGAIN OUTLINED IN YELLOW. IT IS COMPLETELY ENGULFED BY GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND THE SURROUNDING AREA IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. [00:35:03] SO ON APRIL 25TH WE SENT OUT A TOTAL OF ONE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES. WE RECEIVED ZERO RESPONSES ONCE SAM WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY BY THE APPLICANT AND WE POSTED IN THE SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS ON MAY 15TH, 2024. AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HELD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS SPECIFIC ITEM ON MAY 8TH, 2024. SO WHEN IT COMES TO THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 16, IT DEFINES MIXED USE SELF STORAGE AS A CLIMATE CONTROLLED BUILDING CONTAINING GROUND FLOOR RETAIL SERVICE OR OFFICE SPACE WITH SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL STORAGE UNITS FOR RENT OR LEASE. THE CONDUCT OF SALES BUSINESS OR ANY ACTIVITY OTHER THAN STORAGE SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE INDIVIDUAL STORAGE UNITS AND SUCH BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 45 FEET IN HEIGHT. AND AS PER UDC SECTION 21 5 8, A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR MIXED USE SELF STORAGE IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. AND MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 140,600 SQUARE FOOT MIXED USE SELF STORAGE BUILDING AT THE REAR OF A LARGER DEVELOPMENT. THAT INCLUDES A 20,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL RETAIL STRIP CLOSER TO FM THREE TO OH NINE PER THEIR CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN. A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR DISCRETIONAL DISCRETIONARY CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF USES WITH UNIQUE OR WIDELY VARYING OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OR UNUSUAL SITE DEVELOPMENT FEATURES, AGAIN, SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE UDC AND THE APPROVAL OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT ALLOWS APPLICANT TO SUBMIT SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. SO AGAIN, WHEN STAFF LOOKS AT SPECIFIC USE PERMITS, WE REFER TO UDC SECTION 21 5 11 D FOR THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. SO ONE THE PROPOSED USE THAT THE SPECIFY LOCATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES EMBODIED IN THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. SO THE PROPOSED SEP FOR MIXED USE OF STORAGE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE POLICIES EM EMBODIED IN THE ADOPTED COMP PLAN. THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS LOCAL CORRIDOR AS SEEN HERE, UM, IDENTIFIED WITH THE YELLOW STAR LOCAL CORRIDOR. LAND USE TYPE IS A INTENDED FOR COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT TYPE AREAS, TYPICALLY ALONG MEDIUM TO HIGH VOLUME COLLECTOR ROADS WITH NEIGHBORHOODS AT THEIR PERIMETER. AND THIS INCLUDES CONVENTIONAL RETAIL CENTERS, SMALL SCALE MIXED USE, UH, MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND RESIDENTIAL USES THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THEIR SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. AND AS PER UDC CODE, ARTICLE 16 MIXED USE SELF STORAGE IS DEFINED AS A CLIMATE CONTROLLED BUILDING CONTAINING GROUND FOR RETAIL SERVICE OR OFFICE SPACE WITH SEPARATE INDIVIDUAL SELF STORAGE UNITS FOR RENT OR LEASE IN THE CONDUCTS OF SALES BUSINESS OR ANY ACTIVITY OTHER THAN STORAGE SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE INDIVIDUAL STORAGE UNITS. AND THESE BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 45 FEET IN HEIGHT. AND THE PROPOSED MIXED USE OF STORAGE IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS ENVISIONED IN LOCAL CORRIDOR AS IT REQUIRES A MIX OF USES WITHIN THE SELF STORAGE CLIMATE CONTROLLED BUILDING. TWO, THE PROPOSED USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PURPOSE AND INTENT OF THE APPLICABLE ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS. GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE SUITABLE AREAS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NON-RESIDENTIAL USES, WHICH OFFER A WIDE VARIETY OF RETAIL AND SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS THAT ARE GENERALLY ORIENTED TOWARDS SERVING THE OVERALL NEEDS OF THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY. THESE BUSINESSES ARE USUALLY LOCATED ON APPROPRIATELY DESIGNED AND ATTRACTIVELY LANDSCAPE SITES ALONG PRINCIPAL TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS AND THE PROPOSED SEP TO ALLOW MIXED USE SELF STORAGE ALLOWS FOR RETAIL AND OFFICES AT THE FIRST FLOOR OF A MULTI-LEVEL ENCLOSED STORAGE FACILITY. THREE. THE PROPOSED USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH AND PRESERVES THE CHARACTER AND INTEGRITY OF ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS NEIGHBORHOODS AND INCLUDES IMPROVEMENTS EITHER ONSITE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY TO MITIGATE DEVELOPMENT RELATED TO ADVERSE IMPACTS SUCH AS SAFETY, TRAFFIC, NOISE, ODORS, VISUAL NUISANCES, DRAINAGE OR OTHER SIMILAR ADVERSE EFFECTS TO ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOODS. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES SURROUNDED BY OTHER GENERAL BUSINESS BUSINESS DISTRICT'S ZONE PROPERTIES AND IS COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND EXISTING DEVELOPMENT TO THE NORTH. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NEED TO MEET ALL CURRENT CITY OF SHARED SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AS STIPULATED IN UDC ARTICLE NINE AND THE CITY OF SHES IS A PROVIDER FOR WATER AND SYRIA IN THIS AREA. THERE'S AN EXISTING 16 INCH WATER LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND AN EXISTING 15 INCH SEWER LINE TO THE EAST OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. OFFITE EASEMENTS IN MAINES WILL NEED TO BE EXTENDED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE SITE, WHICH WE WILL BE REVIEWED DURING THE PLATTING PROCESS. THE PROPOSED NORTH AND SOUTH CONNECTOR PLANNED COMMERCIAL COLLECTOR A WITH 70 FEET OF RIGHT OF WAY CUTS THROUGH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. HOWEVER, DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, THIS COMMERCIAL COLLECTOR'S PLACEMENT WILL BE REVIEWED AND THE LOCATION CAN BE ADJUSTED AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTY HAS CONSENTED TO THIS ADJUSTMENT AND THE PLANNED EAST AND WEST CONDUCTOR PLANNED SECONDARY ARTERIAL WITH 90 FEET OF RIGHTWAY IS SOUTHEAST OF THE SUBJECT. PROPERTY FOR THE PROPOSED USE DOES NOT GENERATE PEDESTRIAN OR CURRICULAR TRAFFIC, WHICH WILL BE HAZARDOUS OR CONFLICT WITH EXISTING AND ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TWO ACCESS POINTS ALONG FM 3 0 9 PER [00:40:01] THEIR CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, WHICH STILL NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY OF CER ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND TEXT DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. AND ADDITIONALLY, SINCE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ALREADY ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND THE LAND TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE ALSO ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A CROSS LAW ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES TO LIMIT THESE ACCESS POINTS ALONG FM 3 0 0 9. AND ANY PROPOSED ACCESS POINTS ALONG FM 3 0 9 WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY OF SHE'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. FIVE. THE PROPOSED USE INCORPORATES ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OR MECHANISMS AND ACCESS RESTRICTIONS TO CONTROL TRAFFIC FLOOR DIVERT TRAFFIC AS MAY NEEDED TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE DEVELOPMENT GENERATOR GENERATED TRAFFIC ON NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS. AND AGAIN, ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL BELONG WILL BE ALONG FM 3 0 9 AND THE PROPOSED ACCESS POINTS STILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND TECH DO SIX. THE PROPOSED USE INCORPORATES FEATURES TO MINIMIZE ADVERSE EFFECTS INCLUDING VISUAL IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED USE ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND THE PROPOSED ELEMENT WILL HAVE TO MEET ALL THE SITE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AS PER ARTICLE NINE OF THE UDC AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE ALSO ZONE GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND ARE NOT BEING USED FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. SO AS A RESULT, NO ADDITIONAL SCREENING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE WILL BE REQUIRED. AND SEVEN, THE PROPOSED USE MEETS THE STANDARDS FOR THE ZONING DISTRICT OR TO THE EXTENT VARIATIONS FROM HAVE BEEN REQUESTED THAT SUCH VARIATIONS ARE NECESSARY TO RENDER THE USE COMPATIBLE WITH ADJOINING DEVELOPMENT IN NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE TO MEET ALL DIMENSIONAL AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. UM, AS MENTIONED IN UDC SECTION 2157 AND ADDITIONALLY THE PROPOSED SEP REQUIRES A MINIMUM 45 FOOT HEIGHT FOR THE BUILDING AND NO VARIATIONS TO THE REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN REQUESTED AT THIS POINT. EIGHT. THE PROPOSED USE PROMOTES THE HEALTH, SAFETY OR GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY AND THE STATE ORALLY EFFICIENT AND HELPFUL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. AND AS PART PROMOTING HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, THE CITY SHOULD ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING USES, UTILIZING STANDARDS AND TRANSITIONAL USES TO ALLEVIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS. AND DUE TO THE EXISTING GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT PARTY PROPERTY ON FM 3 1 0 9, THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MIXED-USE SELF STORAGE IN GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WOULD NOT POSE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES. NINE. NO APPLICATION MADE UNDER THESE PROVISION WILL RECEIVE FINE APPROVAL UNTIL ALL BACK TAXES OWED TO THE CITY HAVE ED IN FULL. THIS DOES NOT IMPACT THE FIRST READING AT CITY COUNCIL AND 10 OTHER CRITERIA WHICH AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL ARE DEEMED RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT IN THE CONSIDERATION OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT. STAFF HAS ENSURE ALL UDC REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET FOR THE PROPOSED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT AND AT THIS TIME HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FROM THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL. SO STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 S 26, THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW MIXED USE OF STORAGE AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONDITION UPON THE FOLLOWING, ONE, A BUILDING PERMIT IS APPROVED WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE ADOPTION OF THE SUP ORDINANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UDC CODE ARTICLE FIVE, SECTION 21 5 11 F EXPIRATION OF SPECIFIC USE PERMIT AND TWO 25% OF THE USABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE PROPOSED MIXED USE SELF STORAGE BUILDING B FOR OFFICE SERVICE OR RETAIL SPACE SEPARATE FROM THE INDIVIDUAL SELF STORAGE UNITS FOR RENT OR LEASE AND MUST BE ALONG THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING FACING THE FM 309TH STREET FRONTAGE. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MET ON MAY 8TH AND MADE A RECOMMENDATION OR APPROVAL WITH A SIX OH VOTE TO CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE WITH THE PRESENTATION. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU MS. MARCUS. UH, DOES THE APPLICANT, UH, LIKE TO SAY A FEW WORDS? THANK YOU DAISY. UH, GOOD EVENING COUNSEL. ASHLEY FAIRMONT, 1 0 1 0 1 REUNION PLACE. UH, THANK YOU GUYS. I KNOW YOU HAVE A A VERY LONG AGENDA SO I WILL TRY TO KEEP IT BRIEF AND THEN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I THINK DAISY DID A REALLY GOOD JOB OF SUMMARIZING THE PROPOSAL. UM, SO ABOUT TWO ACRES OR SO, UM, IS, IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT JUST DOWN THE STREET FROM THE QUICK TRIP THAT WAS BUILT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. AND, UM, THE REASON THAT IT LOOKS A LITTLE FUNNY IS, I'M GONNA JUMP TO THE SITE PLAN REALLY QUICK, IS THE, THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY IS GB OR THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROPERTY IS GB. UM, BUT WE'RE ONLY ADDING THE SUP TO THE BACK PIECE. SO THE IDEA FOR THE FRONTAGE IS A 20,000 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL BUILDING THAT WILL FRONT ON 3 0 0 9. AND THEN BEHIND THAT WOULD BE THE STORAGE BUILDING. SO WE'RE JUST DOING THE SUP ON THE BACK PIECE FOR THAT STORAGE. UM, AND USING THE NEW UDC PROVISION FOR THE MIXED USE SELF-STORAGE. SO IN THIS SITE PLAN YOU CAN SEE, UM, THAT FRONT PART OF THE BUILDING THAT WILL FACE TOWARDS 3 0 0 9 HAS, UM, 20 OF THOSE OFFICE RETAIL UNITS. UM, THEY'RE ABOUT 360 SQUARE FEET EACH, SO A 12 BY 12 OFFICE. AND THEN BEHIND THAT WOULD BE STORAGE TO USE FOR THAT OFFICE OR RETAIL SPACE. UH, AND THEN ALSO THE, THE LEASING [00:45:01] OFFICE FOR THE, UM, STORAGE BUILDING. SO THE STORAGE BUILDING IS FULLY INDOORS SECURED, UM, AIR CONDITIONED OBVIOUSLY WITH DIFFERENT, UH, VARIETY OF UNIT SIZES. AND THEN ON THAT FRONT IS THE RETAIL BUILDING. UM, JUST SOME IDEAS OF ELEVATIONS. THESE ARE JUST CONCEPTUAL, BUT TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE WITH THE RETAIL IN THE FRONT AND THE STORAGE IN THE BACK, UM, I'M HAVING TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. UM, WITH THAT I'LL, I'LL, LIKE I SAID, I'LL TRY TO KEEP IT SHORT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REGARDS TO THIS SUBJECT? AND IF YOU CAN PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE. MY NAME IS MARY SANBORN, FOUR FOUR SIX TWO BRUSH CREEK DRIVE. UM, YOU CAN PUT THIS DEPICTION BACK UP IF YOU COULD, THAT THE, UH, KYLEEN GRIFFIN AND FAIRMONT HAVE PROVIDED WITH THIS YOU THIS, UM, SPECIAL PERMIT. THE LOCATION OF THIS PARTICULAR FACILITY IS ON 3 0 0 9. THEY SHOW ON THIS DEPICTION THE, UH, TWO ENTRY POINTS AND IF YOU ALL LIVE HERE, HOPEFULLY YOU ALL DO. UM, 3 0 0 9 ON THAT UPPER END IS QUITE CONGESTED ON A REGULAR BASIS. ANY ADDITIONAL, UM, FLOW OF RETAIL SPACE? I WAS HOPING IT WAS JUST THE STORAGE, BUT I DIDN'T REALIZE THAT WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR IS AN ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR RETAIL, WHICH WILL ONLY INCREASE THAT FLOW OF TRAFFIC THAT ALREADY HASN'T BEEN ADDRESSED BY THE CITY IN THAT UPPER CORRIDOR. IN ADDITION, THE INFRASTRUCTURE'S NOT THERE EVEN THOUGH THEY'VE NOTATED ADDITIONAL, UM, SEWER CONNECTION AND SO FORTH. AS YOU ALL KNOW FROM THE MASTER PLAN FROM THE CITY OF SHIRTS, THAT WHOLE UPPER CORRIDOR IS LACKING IN SIZE FOR THE CAPACITY. UM, IT DOES POSE AN, UH, ADVERSE IMPACT BASED ON YOUR 25 LEFT. OKAY, SO YOUR 21.5 11, UH, D CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. UM, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS BEEN MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY OF COUNCIL IS CONSIDERING FINAL ACTION ON A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT SHOULD CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. MANY OF THESE, UM, ARE NOT MET THERE. THEY ARE, THERE IS IMPACT TO TRAFFIC. WE'LL HAVE, UH, WE HAVE ADDITIONAL, UM, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, THOSE BUILDINGS ACROSS THE STREET THAT HAVEN'T BEEN FULLY DEVELOPED BUT ARE, ARE OBVIOUS IN THE PIPELINE TO DO SO. YOU'RE GONNA HAVE, UM, THIS ON THE OTHER SIDE WITH RETAIL SPACE. IT'S JUST GONNA MAKE A MESS OF 3 0 0 9, EVEN WORSE THAN IT CURRENTLY IS. AND UH, THERE'S NO ADJUSTMENT FOR THAT. SO THERE IS AN IMPACT. I DON'T LIKE THE FACT THAT IT SAID A MINIMUM OF 45 FEET, WHICH IS A FOUR STORY BUILDING THAT SHOULD BE THE MAX. 'CAUSE BASED ON OUR PLAN, WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE KEEPING GREEN SPACE HERE AND UH, AESTHETICS, RIGHT? SO WE CONTINUING TO ALLOW UNCONTROLLED AND OR UH, AESTHETICALLY, UM, NOT PLEASANT TO OUR CITY OF CHURCHS THAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE PROUD OF HAVING GREEN SPACE AND SO FORTH. WE SHOULD HAVE CONSIDERATION THAT IT SHOULD BE THE MAX. THERE SHOULD BE A MAX, NOT A MEN ON THE HEIGHT OF THESE BUILDINGS AND OR THE AESTHETIC, UM, REQUIREMENT. AND THE CITY OF SHEZ HAS THAT PART OF THE MA MASTER PLAN. YOU CAN HAVE SOME OF THESE CONSIDERATIONS. MY MAIN THING THERE SHOULD BE AN ACCELERATING LINE AND A DECELERATING LINE FOR THOSE IF AT A MINIMUM FOR THE ACCESS POINTS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? ROBERT JAMESON 45 0 4 BRUSH CREEK DRIVE. I LIVE IN FOREST RIDGE, I GUESS SOMEWHERE WHERE THIS OTHER WOMAN LIVES. I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW MY NEIGHBORS. UM, WE'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE TRAFFIC. THE TRAFFIC ON THREE OVER THE NINE IS A NIGHTMARE. IT'S A RACE TRACK OUT THERE. IT'S DIFFICULT TO EXIT OUR SUBDIVISION AND TO ENTER IT WHILE ON EITHER GETTING REAR-ENDED, TRYING TO ENTER IT OR EVEN GETTING OUT INTO THE, THE MIDDLE LANE, THE SUICIDE LANE TO GET INTO ADJOINING TRAFFIC TO HEAD UP TOWARDS THE QT AND HEB AND THAT IT STARTS ABOUT FIVE O'CLOCK IN THE MORNING. THAT'S WHEN RUSH HOUR STARTS. OUR PROPERTY BACKS UP RIGHT NEXT TO 3 0 0 9 WITH ABOUT A HUNDRED YARDS IN BETWEEN WITH THE, THE WOODS OR THE GREEN [00:50:01] ZONE THAT'S STILL THERE, WHICH WILL BE DEVELOPED ONE DAY, I ASSUME. UM, AND IT, IT RUNS TILL ABOUT EIGHT O'CLOCK AT NIGHT AND IT IS LITERALLY A RACETRACK. IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN OUT ON 3 0 0 9 LATELY, I SAY JUST YOU GO OUT AND AND EN ENJOY THE, THE MOTORCYCLE RACES AND EVERYTHING ELSE AS SUCH. UM, THE OTHER CONCERN I HAVE, I'VE BEEN IN CHURCHS AND I'VE LIVED AT THAT PROPERTY SINCE 1998. WE HAD A FLOOD THAT YEAR. WE'VE BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH, THE DITCHES WERE ALL FILLED UP. WE'RE ADDING TWO MORE ACRES OF CONCRETE MCADAM. WHERE'S THE RUNOFF GONNA GO? ALL WE HAVE DONE IS DEVELOPED EVERYTHING UP THERE SINCE 98 AND EVERYTHING FUNNELS DOWN THROUGH HEB LOWS AND IT ALL COMES DOWN THROUGH FOREST RIDGE. AND NOW THEY'RE GONNA PUT MORE CONCRETE ON THE OTHER SIDE IS, IS THERE PLANNING FOR A RETENTION POND? UM, I KNOW THERE'S THE EASEMENT FOR THE POWER LINES THAT RUN THROUGH ON STEIN AND I KNOW YOU CAN'T BUILD UNDER THOSE. IS THAT GONNA BECOME THE FLOOD ZONE? SO I DON'T THINK EVERYTHING HAS BEEN ADDRESSED AND, AND I HOPE MORE QUESTIONS ARE ASKED BEFORE THIS IS APPROVED. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. ALL RIGHT. COUNSEL FLOOR'S OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. NO DISCUSSION. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE? EXCUSE ME. OKAY. MAYOR PRO CHAIRMAN MACALUSO, I, I MIGHT BE IN THE MINORITY HERE, BUT I, I STILL HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SPECIAL USE PERMITS ARE FOR SOMETHING THAT'S UNIQUE FOR THE AREA AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A PRECIOUS AMOUNT OF LAND LEFT REALLY IN INSIDE THE CITY. AND WHEN I SEE THIS DEVELOPMENT, THAT IS NOT SOMETHING I THINK IS, MEETS THE AESTHETICS THAT WE HAVE IN THE CITY. AND TO ME A SELF STORAGE FACILITY IS BETTER SUITED TO BE, YOU KNOW, NEAR AN INDUSTRIAL AREA WHERE IT FITS IN WITH THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE AREA TO, I JUST DON'T SEE THIS AS BEING A UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT THAT WE SHOULD MAKE THAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR. AND THAT'S JUST MY OPINION. WELL, I DON'T THINK HE HAD A QUESTION, BUT NOW THAT YOU'RE HERE, , I DO HAVE A QUESTION. YOU KNOW, THE, UH, THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS FOR THE STORAGE FACILITY ONLY BECAUSE THEY, AND I, I THINK THE, THE STORAGE FACILITY HAS LESS TRAFFIC THAN THE BUSINESS, UH, FACILITY WOULD HAVE BECAUSE THEY ADDRESS THE, THE, THE NUMBER, THE TRAFFIC CONCERNS THAT ARE ON 30 0 9 AND WE SEE THAT, BUT IT'S MINIMAL CONS CONSIDERING A BUSINESS, HAVING CUSTOMERS ON A CONSTANT BASIS. STORAGE FACILITIES. I HAVE A STORAGE FACILITY. I OB I DON'T EVEN VISIT THAT ONCE A MONTH SOMETIMES. SO, SO I THINK THAT THE TRAFFIC IS MINIMAL, ISN'T IT? WHEN, WHEN YOU HAVE A STORAGE FACILITY. SO I'LL, I'LL PROVIDE A COMMENT TO MAYOR PROTON MACALUSO FIRST. SO A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, UM, IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THINK OF IT MORE AS IT'S A WAY TO BRING A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT TO CITY COUNCIL ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS OF DO WE WANT A MIXED USE SELF STORAGE FACILITY AT THIS SPECIFIC LOCATION? SO IT'S LESS ABOUT IS THIS A REALLY UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT, LIKE A, YOU KNOW, A PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, A PDD. WE USUALLY SAY THAT'S A, IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE THIS UNIQUE NEW TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IS REALLY FOR A CASE BY CASE IS A MIXED USE SELF-STORAGE SHOULD IT GO IN THIS SPECIFIC LOCATION. UM, YOU MAY REMEMBER BACK IN APRIL WE BROUGHT FORWARD THE UDC AMENDMENT. THAT WAS A BRAND NEW CONCEPT FOR THIS MIXED USE SELF-STORAGE. AND THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF IT WAS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT AESTHETIC, MAKE IT A MINIMUM OF 45 FEET FEET HIGH. SO IT HAS THAT DIFFERENT APPEARANCE REQUIRE THE GROUND STORY RETAIL OFFICE TO MAKE IT MORE OF A USE THAT, YOU KNOW, IS NOT EXACTLY PERMITTED BY WRIGHT IN GENERAL BUSINESS, WHICH IS WHY WE'RE HERE. BUT ALLOW FOR A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT IN THE GENERAL BUSINESS WHERE A SELF-STORAGE MINI WAREHOUSE, PUBLIC STORAGE, THAT WOULD STILL REQUIRE A MORE INTENT ZONING DISTRICT BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THAT RETAIL COMPONENT. SO KIND OF TOUCHING ON THE MAYOR'S POINT, THE ITEM TONIGHT IS SPECIFICALLY JUST FOR THAT BACK TWO ACRES, [00:55:01] WHICH IS THE MINI MIXED USE SELF STORAGE. THE RETAIL COMPONENT ALONG THE FRONT IS ALREADY PERMITTED IN GENERAL BUSINESS. SO EVEN IF SAY THE SUP GETS DENIED TONIGHT, THEY COULD STILL COME IN AND DO THE RETAIL ALONG THE FRONTAGE. UM, REGARDLESS, I DON'T WANNA SPEAK TO THE PARKING COUNTS 'CAUSE I'M, I'M NOT A TRAFFIC ENGINEER, I DON'T, BUT I WOULD ASSUME THAT YES, THE STORAGE ITSELF WOULD HAVE LESS TRAFFIC, BUT REMEMBER THE WHOLE POINT OF THE MIXED USE SELF STORAGE IS TO HAVE RETAIL OFFICE LEASE SPACES, UM, INCLUDED WITHIN THAT BUILDING. YEAH, AND I, AND MAYBE TO PROVIDE A BIT OF HISTORY EVEN BEFORE EMILY WAS HERE, AND I THINK COUNCILMAN BROWN MAY REMEMBER THIS, MAYBE COUNCILMAN DAVIS, YOU KNOW, IT USED TO BE THAT WE ONLY ALLOWED MANY STORAGE IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS AND THAT WAS SORT OF WHEN MANY STORAGE WAS THE LOW SLUNG METAL BUILDINGS WHERE YOU DRIVE IN, IT'S ONE STORY, THERE'S JUST A ROW OF DOORS, UH, IT'S UN-AIR CONDITIONED TYPICALLY SORT OF THING. AND WHAT WE SAW WITH THE ONE THAT CAME IN OFF I 10 BY THE STARBUCKS WAS A DIFFERENT PRODUCT TYPE. UM, AND, AND I THINK IT, IT, THE IDEA WAS THAT FIT BETTER IN SOME LOCATIONS THEN BEING TUCKED AWAY IN AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. AND FRANKLY, DID WE REALLY WANT THAT TAKEN UP SPACE IN OUR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS OR IS THE IDEA IT CAN BE CLOSER TO RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND BE APPROPRIATE. THUS THE ONE UP ON I 35 BY THE MCDONALD'S, IF YOU WILL. UM, WHAT I THINK COUNCIL SAID THOUGH IS IF WE'RE GONNA ALLOW THIS, LET'S MAKE SURE IT'S THIS NEW STYLE, THUS THE RETAIL COMPONENT THAT'S REQUIRED AND AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO AGAIN, AS EMILY SAID, IT'S A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, NOT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. IT REALLY IS TO DECIDE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS IF THIS IS APPROPRIATE OR NOT. AND SO FOR EXAMPLE, WHERE STAFF MIGHT HAVE MORE CONCERN IS IF THIS BACK DIRECTLY UP TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. NOW IRONICALLY, THE ONE UP ON 35 BY THE MCDONALD'S IS PRETTY CLOSE TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. AND I DON'T RECALL US GETTING A WHOLE LOT OF COMPLAINTS BECAUSE AGAIN, IT'S FAIRLY QUIET, IT DOESN'T GENERATE A TON OF TRAFFIC. MAYBE MORE ON THE WEEKENDS KIND OF A THING. UH, BUT IT CERTAINLY ISN'T LIKE A RESTAURANT OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO AGAIN, IT'S COUNSEL'S DECISION WHETHER THIS IS APPROPRIATE OR NOT. UM, BUT AGAIN, AS EMILY SAID, IT'S REALLY ABOUT ARE WE OKAY WITH THE STORAGE COMPONENT HERE? UM, YOU KNOW, IN THIS CASE, AND AGAIN, I THINK FROM A STAFF PERSPECTIVE, RESIDENTS COMM ARE WELL TAKEN. WE HAVE A LOT OF TRAFFIC AT AT 3 0 0 9 AND 35 AND WE'RE GONNA HAVE A LOT OF TRAFFIC AT 3 0 0 9 AND AND 35, RIGHT? THAT'S JUST A FUNCTION OF ALL THE THINGS THAT WE SAY WE WANT AND THEN IT COMES WITH TRAFFIC. SO I HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE DEVELOPER ON YOUR PLAN, YOUR CONCEPTUAL PLAN. I KNOW YOU HAVE THE STORAGE AND THAT'S WHAT THE SUP IS FOR. YES. BUT ON THE FRONT SIDE, YOU HAVE THE BUSINESS IS YOUR, IS THE PLAN TO BUILD BOTH OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME? YES. OKAY. THANK YOU. CONSTRUCT THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME AND, AND I THINK THE IDEA IS THAT, YOU KNOW HOW TO BEST USE THE SPACE, RIGHT? I THINK, I MEAN, NOT EVERYONE WOULD AGREE AND I'M HAPPY TO TALK TO NEIGHBORS WITH CONCERNS AFTER THE MEETING AS WELL. UM, BUT YOU KNOW, 3 0 0 9 BEING THOSE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, BEING THE RETAIL BEING THE COMMERCIAL THAT PEOPLE WANT AND THEN, YOU KNOW, WHAT GOES BEHIND THAT? UM, SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALREADY ZONE GB THOUGHT SELF STORAGE WAS A GOOD USE. THIS DEVELOPER IS A, A FAMILY BUSINESS THAT DOES SELF STORAGE OVER 50 PROJECTS. SO, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE WELL EXPERIENCED IN IT AND WE'RE HAPPY TO ADD ANY CONDITIONS, UM, THAT GO WITH THE, THE SUP AS WELL. UM, BUT THAT BEING, YOU KNOW, THE BEST USE TO GO BEHIND THE RETAIL TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO RESIDENTS OF SHIRTS WHO NEED STORAGE UNITS. I MEAN, I I'M SURE YOU ALL HAVE USED STORAGE UNITS. I'VE USED STORAGE UNITS, UM, THAT IT'S AT A CONVENIENT LOCATION THAT IS A LOW TRAFFIC GENERATOR. UM, AND SOMETHING THAT, THAT GOES BEHIND THAT RETAIL. 'CAUSE USUALLY IT'S A STORAGE UNIT OR MAYBE APARTMENTS, YOU KNOW, WHAT, WHAT HAPPENS BEHIND THAT. SO THAT WAS THE GOAL HERE. UH, BUT YES, CONSTRUCTED ALL AT THE SAME TIME. UH, DID THE CONCERN ABOUT DRAINAGE, IT ACTUALLY FLOWS SOUTH. UM, BUT THERE WILL BE DETENTION ON SITE, BUT IT WILL BE UNDER THE BUILDING SO IT'LL BE UNDERGROUND TO BEST UTILIZE THE PROPERTY. UH, FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY TREE, LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE, ALL THOSE SORTS OF THINGS. SO NO VARIANCES THERE. ALRIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, NOT REALLY A, A QUESTION FOR YOU PER SE, BUT, UH, I DID NOTICE AS I LOOK AT THE, THE SITE PLAN, THIS IS KIND OF AN ODDBALL PIECE OF LAND THERE WITH THE, UH, UH, THE LARGE OVERHEAD WIRE. SO I DON'T SEE WHERE YOU'RE GONNA FIT MUCH ELSE BEHIND THERE. UH, DID YOU GUYS PURCHASE THAT WHOLE? NO. SO, SO IT'S THE, THE RIPS PROPERTY AND THEY'RE SELLING PIECES, LITTLE PIECES. YEAH. UM, AND SO THEY SOLD TO QUICKTRIP A FEW YEARS AGO AND THAT WENT IN, THIS IS THE NEXT PIECE THAT THEY'RE SELLING. I ACTUALLY THINK BEHIND THE BUILDING WILL BE THE, UM, EXTENSION OF BAPTIST HEALTH. [01:00:01] 'CAUSE I WAS GONNA SAY, I, I KNOW THAT WE'RE GONNA SEE MORE, UH, THE, THE, UH, WHAT DO THEY CALL 'EM? THE FEEDER STREETS, UH, IN, IN THERE AND ONE'S SUPPOSED TO GO EAST WEST, ANOTHER ONE'S NORTH, SOUTH, YES. UH, RIGHT, RIGHT AROUND WHERE THAT IS. SO, SO YEAH. BE BEHIND IT WILL LIKELY BE THAT STREET. UM, AND THAT WILL CONNECT TO, I THINK, THE EXTENSION OF OLD WEEDER STEIN. YEAH. BUT THERE, THERE'S GONNA BE MORE TRAFFIC, UH, OFF 3 0 0 9 MORE, MORE AVAILABILITY OFF 3 0 0 9 TO, TO HELP ALLEVIATE THE 3 0 0 9 MAIN TRAFFIC PROBLEMS. UH, IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT'S KIND OF COUNTER COUNTERINTUITIVE, BUT AS WE GROW SOME OF THOSE ROADS THAT ARE ADDED, WE'LL TAKE SOME OF THAT, UH, UH, PRESSURE OFF, YOU KNOW, AND OF COURSE WE'LL PROBABLY SEE TXDOT ADDING LIGHTS ALONG 3 0 0 9 AS WE, AS WE BUILD AS WELL. SO, MM-HMM. ? YES, SIR. COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD, CAN YOU GO BACK TO YOUR CONCEPTUAL PICTURE? SURE, PLEASE. I HAVE IT UP. I'M NOT SURE HOW TO GET IT ON THERE. OKAY. SORRY. I JUST WANTED THE DESIGN 'CAUSE I'M STILL TRYING TO, AS I SIT HERE, THINK ABOUT, I LIVE DOWN OFF OF 11 TOWARD THE 1103 WHERE THERE IS A STORAGE THERE. IT'S KIND OF TUCKED IN THE BACK, SO YOU REALLY DON'T SEE IT. AND I'M JUST, I GUESS FOR ME, CONCEPTUALLY WISE, I'M TRYING TO ENVISION A SECOND STORY, TWO STORY ON 3 0 0 9 WHEN YOU'RE DRIVING UP. I'M JUST TRYING TO SEE IF THERE'S LIKE THE OTHER ONE WHERE YOU KIND OF HAD THE PICTURES OF WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE. GROUND VIEW. YEAH. AND THEN WITH THE RETAIL IN THE FRONT. MM-HMM. , THAT'S THE PART I JUST, I'M TRYING TO SURE. AND, AND SO, YOU KNOW, WE LOOKED AT THREE OR FOUR STORIES. OKAY. UM, CONSIDERED BOTH THE THREE STORY OPTION WOULD ONLY BE PERMITTED WITH THE CHANGE OF THE BASE ZONING TO GB TWO, AND THEN ALSO THE ADDITION OF THE SUP. WITH THAT, THIS WILL JUST BE, THIS ONE IS TO, TO HAVE THE MINIMUM OF THE 45 FEET IS CAN GO IN THE GB WITH THE SUP. SO IT'S JUST THE SUP REQUEST, THE MAXIMUM. OKAY. AND SO THAT'S HOW WE, I MEAN WE WERE, WE, WE'VE HAD, YOU KNOW, MEETINGS WITH CITY STAFF, UM, PRELIMINARY PLAN MEETINGS TO REVIEW THOSE THINGS. AND SO THAT'S KIND OF, YOU KNOW, HOW WE ENDED UP AT THE FOUR STORY. NOW WITH YOUR, I GUESS THE ENTRANCES THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, ARE THOSE GONNA BE OFF OF 3 0 0 9 OR LIKE MORE OF THE OFF THE SIDE ROADS? JUST CURIOUS. UH, SO THE, THE TWO PROPOSED INGRESS AND EGRESSES ARE OFF OF 3 0 0 9. THAT'S SUBJECT TO TDOT AND CITY APPROVAL. OKAY. UM, I THINK AT ONE POINT WE TALKED ABOUT ONE OF THE MEETINGS BEING FIRE ACCESS ONLY FOR ONE OF THOSE. UM, AND, AND SO, YOU KNOW, IT MAY BE ONE ONLY, UH, WITH PROBABLY A, A DESAL LANE TO TURN IN. OKAY. WELL THEN JUST A POINT FOR CLARIFICATION. SO EVERYBODY'S, EVERYBODY'S GOOD ON THIS. SO THE UDC AMENDMENT AND THE DEFINITION FOR MIXED USE SELF STORAGE IS A MINIMUM, MINIMUM OF 45 FEET. SO TO EVEN REQUEST THIS APPLICATION, THE PROJECT HAS TO BE AT LEAST 45 FEET. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON, UH, QUESTION FOR DEVELOPER AND POTENTIALLY OUR, OUR STAFF. SO, UM, IS THIS THE ONLY OPTION THAT WE HAVE AND WHAT TYPE OF SURVEY WAS MADE TO, TO GAUGE FROM THE DEVELOPER THAT THIS IS GONNA BE IT, LIKE THIS IS THE BEST USE OF THIS AREA BEHIND THE RETAIL, THE STORAGE SPACE, YOU MEAN? CORRECT. UM, SO I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT THEY DO. UM, THEY, THEY, LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE A FAMILY OWNED BUSINESS OVER 50, 60 YEARS IN STORAGE. SO, YOU KNOW, THEY LOOK AT MARKETS, THEY LOOK AT WHERE DEMAND IS. UM, AND SO THE, THE STORAGE IS REALLY DRIVING THE PROJECT. UM, AND THE RETAIL IS KIND OF COMING ALONG WITH IT. UM, SO, YOU KNOW, IN TERMS OF EXACT PRECISE STUDIES THAT THEY DO, I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE I COULD GET YOU AN ANSWER, BUT, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE A LOT OF SUCCESSFUL PROJECTS, SO, AND THEY ARE PRETTY THOUGHTFUL ABOUT THEIR SITE SELECTION. MAYBE JUST AGAIN, TO CLARIFY STAFF'S ROLE, SO, SO KIND OF HIGHEST AND BEST USE IS A DEVELOPMENT TERM. IT'S NOT A, IT'S NOT A PLANNING TERM, IT'S NOT A STAFF TERM. WE, WE LOOK AT AN APPROPRIATE USE. AND SO OURS REALLY IS NOT, IS THIS THE BEST USE? OUR, OUR LOOK IS TO SAY, IS THIS APPROPRIATE OR NOT? AND AGAIN, FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, AGAIN, AS, AS DAISY HAD SAID, YOU KNOW, THE PROPERTY IS ZONE COMMERCIAL, THE FRONT PART, THE RETAIL THEY CAN DO RIGHT NOW, IT REALLY IS ABOUT, IS THIS SELF STORAGE APPROPRIATE? AGAIN, THE IDEA THAT COUNCIL HAD THAT STAFF TOOK FROM THAT AMENDMENT WAS, YEP, WE WANT THESE KIND OF CLOSER TO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE FOLKS ARE THAT USE IT. UM, BUT AGAIN, IT, THEY TEND TO BE ON THE HIGHER TRAFFIC CORRIDOR AND SO IT FITS FROM THAT [01:05:01] PERSPECTIVE. UM, BUT JUST SO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW STAFF LOOKS AT, WE REALLY LOOK AT THIS FROM A IS THIS AN APPROPRIATE LAND USE? NOT IS IT THE BEST LAND USE, RIGHT? BECAUSE THAT BECOMES SUBJECTIVE AGAIN ON FOLKS WHO SAY, WELL WE DON'T WANT A LOT OF TRAFFIC. THERE PROBABLY ARE USES THAT GENERATE LESS TRAFFIC THAN THE RETAIL COMPONENT. UM, THERE ARE OTHER FOLKS, AND I USE THE THING I'VE BEEN HIT WITH OVER THE YEARS, AND SOME OF YOU GUYS KNOW THIS AS WELL, YOU KNOW, WE REALLY WANT A CRACKER BARREL. I WOULD BE THE BIGGEST HERO IF WE EVER GOT A CRACKER BARREL SOMEHOW. UM, YOU KNOW, SO A LOT OF PEOPLE WOULD SAY THAT'S THE BEST USE FOR IT. BUT, BUT THAT'S AGAIN, NOT REALLY WHAT STAFF LOOKS AT. JUST AGAIN, TO REMIND EVERYBODY THAT THAT WHAT WE LOOK AT IS THE APPROPRIATE AND FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE IT'S AN APPROPRIATE USE. IT'S, IT'S AN ODD PIECE OF PROPERTY. IT FITS. UH, BUT WE SORT OF LOOK TO THE DEVELOPERS TO SAY WHETHER OR NOT THERE'S DEMAND FOR A USE. YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD RESIDENTS STAND UP AND SAY, WELL WE THINK YOU HAVE TOO MANY GAS STATION CONVENIENCE STORES, BUT YOU KNOW, AT SOME POINT IF THAT NEW GAS STATION CONVENIENCE STORE CAN PROVIDE BETTER SERVICE, CHEAPER GAS CLEANER FACILITIES, THEN THEN THEY SHOULD HAVE AT IT. AND YOU KNOW, THEN OUR RESIDENTS GET THE BETTER SERVICE AT THE END OF THE DAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS? I'LL MAKE A UH, MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 S 26. SECOND WE HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SIX A'S ONE OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER SIX. ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 A 27 CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERING REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ON APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES KNOWN AS AL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 5 4 4 9 AL COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING MS. DELGADO FLOOR'S. YOURS, GOOD EVENING MAYOR COUNSEL. SO THIS IS FOR THE ANNEXATIONS FOR AL COUNTY AND GUADALUPE COUNTY, EMILY DELGADO, PLANNING MANAGER. SO I WILL SAY MY FIRST COUPLE OF SLIDES WILL BE APPLICABLE FOR ORDINANCES 24 A 27 THROUGH 24 A 65. SO SOME BACKGROUND ANNEXATION OF LAND AND THE CITY'S CORPORATE LIMITS MAY BE VOLUNTARY OR INVOLUNTARY. THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE PROVIDES REQUIREMENTS AND OUTLINES THE ANNEXATION PROCESS BASED ON THE ANNEXATION TYPE. THE PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS ARE VOLUNTARY BASED ON THE DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS THAT WERE ORIGINALLY ENTERED INTO IN 2010 AND 2011 AND THE EXTENSIONS THAT WERE OFFERED IN 2020 AND 2021. THUS CHAPTER 43, SUB CHAPTER C3 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE APPLIES. ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY'S UDC SECTION 2148 INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR PROCESSING OF VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION REQUESTS IN 2010 AND 2011. THE CITY ASSURES ENTERED INTO THE DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS BASED ON TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 43.016 PER THE AGREEMENTS THAT WERE SIGNED AND EXECUTED. SPECIFICALLY SECTION FIVE TERM ANNEXATION AT THE END OF THE TERM STIPULATES THAT 10 YEARS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AGREEMENT THE PROPERTY IS TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF SHIRTS IN 2020 AND 2021. THE CITY OF SHIRT CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF TO OFFER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS BASED ON THE NATIONWIDE AND STATEWIDE DECLARATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY IN RELATION TO COVID-19. IN ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS WOULD ALLOW CITY STAFF TO COMPLETE THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN UPDATE WHICH WOULD BE UTILIZED WHEN ZONING THE ANNEX PROPERTIES. THESE EXTENSIONS WOULD PROVIDE THE SAME RIGHTS AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED IN THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENTS, BUT WOULD DELAY THE ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTIES TO A LATER DATE. THE PROHIBITION ON ANNEXATIONS WOULD BE IN EFFECT UNTIL JANUARY 1ST, 2024, AT WHICH TIME THE CITY ASSERTS WOULD BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS AND CONCLUDE THEM NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31ST, 2024. AT THIS TIME, THE FIRST DATE IDENTIFIED IN THE AGREEMENT JANUARY 1ST HAS PASSED. ADDITIONALLY WITH THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 S OH SIX, THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN HAS OFFICIALLY BEEN ADOPTED AND CAN BE UTILIZED FOR ZONING CASES MOVING FORWARD PER THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION CITY STAFF STARTED THE ANNEXATION AND ZONING PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXTENSIONS IN THE FALL OF 2023. RESOLUTION 24 R 41 APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 16TH ACCEPTED PETITIONS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF 25 PROPERTIES, APPROXIMATELY 507 ACRES WITHIN COLE COUNTY AND 14 PROPERTIES APPROXIMATELY 387 ACRES WITHIN GUADALUPE COUNTY. THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCES, 24 A 27 THROUGH 24 A 65 IF APPROVED WOULD ANNEX THE 25 PROPERTIES WITHIN CONAL COUNTY AND 14 PROPERTIES WITHIN GUADALUPE COUNTY. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HELD THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ASSOCIATED ZONING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ON MAY 8TH AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS USUAL CAN BE VIEWED ON THE CITY'S YOUTUBE SITE. UM, AND AS A NOTE ON THIS, BECAUSE THERE'S BEEN SOME, YOU KNOW, COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS ALREADY ON THIS, THE PLANNING AND [01:10:01] ZONING COMMISSION MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO ZONE ALL OF THE PROPERTIES WITHIN THESE THESE GROUPS OF 24 A 27 THROUGH 24 A 65 TO AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, WHICH IS WHAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING TONIGHT AS WELL TO ZONE THE PROPERTIES TO AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, WHICH IS INTENDED FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES. A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED ON MAY 24TH IN THE SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS, THE ANN FOR THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTIES IN CUMA AND GUADALUPE COUNTY. A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS MAILED TO CUMA ISD ON MAY 24TH. ADDITIONALLY, A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS POSTED ON THE CITY OF SHE'S WEBSITE ON MAY 23RD. AND ALTHOUGH THE ORIGINAL NOTICE ENCOMPASSED ALL OF THE CUMA AND GUADALUPE COUNTY CAR PARCELS PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT IS MORE APPROPRIATE FOR CITY COUNCIL TO TAKE ACTION ON EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL SEPARATELY. THIS IS WHY EACH INDIVIDUAL PARCEL WAS LISTED SEPARATELY ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND EACH WILL HAVE ITS OWN PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION UNDER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 43.057 STAFF FINDS THAT SURROUNDING ANY AREA BUT NOT INCLUDING SUCH AREA WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS THROUGH THIS ANNEXATION IS IN THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST. SO THE FIRST SLIDE HERE IS FOR THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE PROPOSED IN COMAL COUNTY FOR ANNEXATION. YOU CAN SEE THOSE ARE THE ONES IDENTIFIED IN GREEN. AND THEN HERE ARE THE PROPERTIES PROPOSED IN GUADALUPE COUNTY FOR ANNEXATION. SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 A 27 THROUGH ORDINANCE 24 A 65 FOR THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 529 ACRES WITHIN CONAL COUNTY AND 477 WITHIN GUADALUPE COUNTY. AND AS I SAID, ALL OF THOSE SLIDES ARE APPLICABLE, EXCUSE ME, APPLICABLE FOR ALL OF THOSE ORDINANCES. BUT THEN SPECIFICALLY FOR EACH ITEM I'LL HAVE ITS OWN EXHIBIT. SO HERE IS 24 A 27. THIS FIRST ITEM YOU CAN SEE HERE, IT IDENTIFIED IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES LOCATED NEAR ECKARD ROAD IN I 35. THANK YOU. THANK YOU MR. ODO. ALRIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL QUESTIONS MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 27. SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWNS SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? WE, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. NEXT IS ITEM UH, NUMBER SEVEN, ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 A 28. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ON APPROXIMATELY 26 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 5 4 6 3 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING MS. DELGADO. SO AGAIN, ALL THOSE SAME SLIDES. AND THEN HERE IS THAT SPECIFIC PROPERTY OUTLINED IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 26 ACRES AND YOU CAN SEE IT'S NEAR SCHWAB ROAD AND I 35. WE'RE NOT SEEING THE, IT'S ON THE SCREEN BEHIND COUNSEL. SO LET'S SEE BEHIND US. MIKE. OH, THERE IT IS. OKAY. ALRIGHT. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA. AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. ALRIGHT, PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL QUESTIONS MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND, WE HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUN, UH, MAYOR PRO TEMP, UH, MACALUSO AND SECONDMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. NEXT IS ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 A 29. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ON APPROXIMATELY 74 ACRES KNOWN AS COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SE 7 9 0 1 2 KMEL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING MS. DELGADO. SO THIS IS FOR 74 ACRES. IT'S NEAR SCHWAB AND 4 82. SO SCHWAB ROAD THERE FM 4 82 LOCATED THERE. ONCE AGAIN, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA. AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL FLOOR'S OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 8 29. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, [01:15:01] NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. HEY ITEM NUMBER NINE, ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 8 30 CONDUCT CONDUCTED PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERING REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES KNOWN AS COLE MEL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 5 4 6 2 COLE, MEL COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING MS. DELGADO FLOOR IS YOURS. SO THIS IS FOR A FIVE ACRE TRACT. YOU CAN SEE IT HERE AGAIN. SCHWAB 35 AND THEN FM 42 UP TO THE NORTH. OKAY. ALRIGHT. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL FLOOR IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE. 24 A 32ND WE HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. UH, COUNCIL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM NUMBER 10, ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 8 31 CONDUCTING PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.2 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 9 2 3. COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS. MS. DELGADO FLOOR. YOURS 1.2 ACRES HERE IS OLD NACODOCHES AND THEN 4 82. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL FLOOR IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 27 DASH A DASH 31 SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. MAYOR PRO TEMP. WILL YOU READ THE ITEM NUMBER 11? ORDINANCE 24 A 32. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 7 4 1 4 8 AL COUNTY TEXAS FIRST READING. SO THERE IS THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN GREEN APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE AND THEN FM 42 TO THE SOUTH. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU MS. DELGADO. ALL RIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA. THERE'S AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 27 8 33. SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I THINK DID I CLEAR? SORRY, SORRY. IT'S 32. UH, SORRY. MOTION TO APPROVE. ORDINANCE 24 A 32 32. OKAY, THERE'S A CORRECTION ON THAT AND THE SECOND STILL STANDS. AM I CORRECT? COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON? YES. OKAY. ALRIGHT COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. NUMBER 12, ORDINANCES 24 A 33. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS AL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 79 0 1 8 AL COUNTY, TEXAS. THIS IS FIRST READING PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN GREEN APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE AND THEN FM 42 TO THE NORTH. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. ALRIGHT, COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 33 SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF NOT, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 13, ORDINANCE 24 A 34. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 31 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 1 7 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS IS FIRST READING PROPERTY IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 31 ACRES NEAR FM 42 HERE IN SCHWAB ROAD. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO [01:20:01] THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 34 HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN AND SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TENT MACALUSO. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 14, ORDINANCE 24 A 35. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 5 4 6 8 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN I 35 FOR REFERENCE. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MAKE MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 35 SECOND A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 15, ORDINANCE 24 A 36. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY NINE ACRES KNOWN AS AL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 7 4 1 4 6 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY IDENTIFIED HERE IN GREEN APPROXIMATELY NINE ACRES FM 40 82 AND OLD MACS. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE TENANTS WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? FOR THE RECORD, IF YOU CAN PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND YES. MARTIN RENAN. 22 900 OLD NACODOCHES ROAD. I GUESS JUST, I'LL JUST SAY I'M AGAINST ANNEXATION FOR THIS PROPERTY. IT'S BEEN AGRICULTURAL FOR 167 YEARS. UM, I MEAN I KNOW YOU'RE GONNA VOTE WHAT YOU'RE GONNA VOTE BUT AGAIN I'M GOING BACK TO YOU DON'T PROVIDE THE SERVICES SO WHY ANNEX? UM, WE JUST WANNA KEEP OUR WAY ALIVE THE WAY WE'VE HAD IT AND YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE CAN I SAY? THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL ANY COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, MAKE, MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 8 36. SECOND WE HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE UH, CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 16, ORDINANCE 24 A 37. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES KNOWN AS KMEL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 7 4 1 4 5 KMEL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING ITEM SHOWN HERE IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES ON OLD MACCO ROAD. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? MARTIN FRIES ON 22 900 OLD NACODOCHES ROAD. AND AS YOU CAN SEE THERE, I HAVE ACTUALLY BASED ON THAT MAP, ABOUT FOUR PROPERTIES THE WAY IT'S DIVIDED UP. AND AGAIN, UH, WHOEVER I THINK THAT'S GENERAL BUSINESS IS WHAT YOU'RE, IS WHAT IT'S PROPOSING TO BE ZONED AS. AND I WISH WHOEVER DECIDES TO PUT A BUSINESS SOMEWHERE LONG AFTER I'M PROBABLY GONE, THEY ARE IN THE UH, A HUNDRED YEAR FLOOD PLANE THERE AND THEY'LL HAVE A NICE FLOOD THAT HAPPENS ABOUT EVERY 20 YEARS. AND SAME THING ON PART OF MY OTHER PROPERTY. AND I GUESS JUST GOING ON THE RECORD ONCE AGAIN, I'M NOT AT, I'M NOT FOR ANNEXATION BUT I CAN SEE HOW YOU'RE VOTING BUT YOU KNOW MY OPINION SO THANK YOU. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL FLOOR IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. I MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT ORDINANCE 24 DASH A DASH 37. SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE 60 A'S NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. [01:25:03] ITEM 17, ORDINANCE 24 A 38. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES KNOWN AS THE COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 7 4 1 4 4 COMAL COUNTY TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY SHOWN IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES OFF OLD NACODOCHES ROAD. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING, IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? MARTIN FREEZING ON 22 900 OLD NACODOCHES ROAD AGAIN, UH, I DON'T REALLY APPRECIATE THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PART. I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT EVER CAME ABOUT BUT THAT'S WHAT IT SEEMS TO BE. UM, AGAIN, I'M NOT FOR ANNEXATION AND I REALIZE YES I GET TO KEEP IT AGRICULTURE AND THAT WAS PRESENTED TO ME. I UNDERSTAND ALL THAT AND THAT'S GREAT 'CAUSE YOU KNOW, THAT'S SOMETHING WE'VE DONE FOREVER AND YOU KNOW, WE PLAN TO CONTINUE DOING. BUT AGAIN, I'M ALSO GONNA GO BACK TO THE SERVICES PART AND THAT PARTICULAR PROPERTY RIGHT THERE IS WHERE AS FAR AS THE SERVICES, WHEN YOU CALL 9 1 1, WE HAD A UH, CAR IN THE DITCH RIGHT THERE AT THAT PARTICULAR ONE. AND HOPEFULLY THAT WILL GET RESOLVED AS FAR AS YOU KNOW HOW THE CITY OF SHIRTS THAT WE ARE IN THE CITY OF SHIRTS THERE 'CAUSE THAT ROAD ON OLD NACODOCHES, THIS IS ACTUALLY THE CITY OF SHIRTS YOU CALL 9 1 1 AND I'M GETTING THIS ARGUMENT OF WELL SURE IT'S GONNA TAKE FOUR HOURS TO GET THERE. UM, THEN YOU GET, WELL NO, MAYBE IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE THE UH, KAMAL COUNTY SHERIFF. I MEAN I DON'T CARE. I'M JUST SITTING THERE SAYING, WELL THE GUY'S IN THE DITCH, HE MAY BE DEAD FOR ALL I KNOW. WHY ARE YOU ARGUING AND PRESENTING THAT TO ME? SO AGAIN, GO BACK TO SERVICES. UM, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, IF YOU'RE AX, MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE GONNA PROVIDE THE SERVICES THAT YOU INTEND TO ACCORDING TO WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE. UM, AGAIN, WE'RE JUST GONNA KEEP DOING WHAT WE DO AND THANK YOU AGAIN. AND I THINK THAT'S MY LAST PROPERTY. YOU PROBABLY WON'T HAVE TO HEAR FROM ME AGAIN. ALRIGHT, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADJUST TO COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MOTION OR MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 38 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBERG COUNCIL YOU CAN PLEASE YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 18, ORDINANCE 24 8 39. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 7 4 1 4 7 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE OFF OLD NACODOCHES. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? MARTIN FREEZING ON 22, 900 OLD MACS ROAD. AND, SORRY, I DID LIE I GUESS 'CAUSE APPARENTLY WE HAD ONE MORE LEFT. BUT AGAIN, THAT'S ANOTHER ONE OF OUR PROPERTIES. UNFORTUNATELY IT'S JUST KIND OF DIVIDED INTO FOUR PARCELS. AND SAME THING. I'M NOT FOR ANNEXATION OR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ON THAT. AND THAT ONE ALSO IS KIND OF IN THE FLOODPLAIN DOWN THERE. AND I DON'T KNOW IF, IF YOU'VE LIVED IN THIS AREA LONG ENOUGH, IT'S KIND OF A PATTERN ABOUT EVERY 20 YEARS YOU HAVE A PRETTY GOOD FLOOD. SOMETIMES IT VARIES A LITTLE BIT. AND I BELIEVE 1998 WAS THE LAST ONE, UNFORTUNATELY 'CAUSE OF THE DRY CANALS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THERE. AND UNFORTUNATELY THAT DOES COME UP PRETTY HIGH. LUCKILY WE'RE ON A HILL, BUT REGARDLESS, UH, YOU'LL SEE ANOTHER BIG FLOOD AND, AND THE DRAINAGE PROBLEM THAT WAS ADDRESSED A WHILE AGO. I THINK THAT'S, UH, GONNA BE A BIG ISSUE. UM, AS FAR AS HOW THE WATER DOES FLOW AND STUFF, UM, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, YOU'LL SEE THOSE BIG FLOODS AGAIN 'CAUSE THEY JUST DO HAPPEN. AND AGAIN, NOT FOR ANNEXATION, BUT I SEE THE WAY IT'S GOING. SO HERE WE GO. THANK YOU. LAST PROPERTY THAT I KNOW OF. THANKS. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 27, I MEAN, SORRY, 24 A 39 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF NOT, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 19, ORDINANCE 24 A 40. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 63 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 2 1 8. COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 63 ACRES, ECKER ROAD, FBA, AND THEN I 35 TO THE NORTH. RIGHT. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDAS, AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? [01:30:06] WELL, UH, ANDRES GONZALEZ, 360, BIG JOHN LANE. UH, THAT ETJ WAS, UH, PART OF THE ORIGINAL, UM, PROPERTY OF THE FAMILY. AND IT OBVIOUSLY NOW IT'S UH, DEVELOPED UP UP. UH, AGAIN, I LIKE THE GENTLEMAN WAS SAYING ABOUT, UM, SOME OF THE SERVICES ARE NOT PROVIDED OUT THERE. I WAS BITTEN BY A SNAKE, UH, A YEAR AGO LAST YEAR, UH, RATTLESNAKE. AND IT TOOK, UH, NEW BROWN FALLS SHIRTS AND GUADALUPE TO FIGURE OUT WHO WAS GONNA GO PICK ME UP. SO I DROVE MYSELF TO THE HOSPITAL, UH, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, I WAS GONNA END UP DYING. SO, AND I HAD NO ONE TO TAKE TAKE CARE OF MY KIDS AT THAT MOMENT. SO IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS. SO, UH, WE DON'T, I DON'T HAVE WATER. I HAVE TO TRUCK IN WATER, UH, BECAUSE OF, UH, THE AREA I'M AT. I KNOW THAT SOME OF THE AREAS THAT ARE SIMILAR IN THE ESI AREA, UH, THOSE ARE ACTUALLY PART OF NEW BRAUNFELS. MY PROPERTY'S ACTUALLY PART OF, UM, UH, GREEN VALLEY, UM, WATER SYSTEM, WHATEVER IT IS. SO I'M STUCK IN THE MIDDLE TO WHERE I DON'T HAVE WATER. UH, SO I HAVE TO BE TRUCKING IN WATER. UH, SO I HAVE NO SERVICES. UH, UM, IT'S, IT'S RUGGED OUT THERE. I DON'T MIND IT, BUT I JUST KIND OF THINK IT'S A, IT'S A HASSLE. WE'RE GONNA BE TAXED FOR CERTAIN SERVICES, UM, WHEN I DON'T HAVE THOSE BENEFITS. UH, AS A MATTER OF FACT, TWO DAYS AGO WE CALLED UH, POLICE AGAIN AND UH, THEY COULDN'T FIGURE OUT. AND I UNDERSTAND IT'S PART OF THE ANNEXATION, THEY COULDN'T FIGURE OUT WHO OR DID WHAT. SO FOR THE LAST, UH, TWO AND A HALF, THREE YEARS WE'VE BEEN THE POLICE OUT THERE, MY WIFE, MY CHILDREN, THEY STILL RIDE THE HORSES INTO THE PROPERTIES AND MAKE SURE THAT WE REMOVE ANYONE THAT'S UH, DUMPING TRASH EVEN THOUGH IT'S NO LONGER OUR PROPERTY. THAT'S WHAT WE'RE USED TO OUR, YOU KNOW, RAISE OUR HORSES ONE AND THE FORTH. SO WE ARE THE POLICE OUT THERE AS WELL. SO I JUST APPRECIATE IT, YOU KNOW, AND BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION, UH, WHEN ANNEXING US. SO. OKAY, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. A MOTION WE ACCEPT THE ORDINANCE. 24. A 42ND MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO MO NO NO OBJECTIONS. AND THERE'S BEEN A REQUEST FOR PRIVILEGE SO WE'RE GONNA TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK. ALRIGHT, THE TIME IS NOW 7 58. WE'RE GONNA RESUME OUR CITY COUNCIL. OKAY, WE'RE ON ITEM NUMBER 20, MAYORAL TEMP. IF YOU CAN PROCEED. ITEM 20, ORDINANCE 24 A 41. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 25.1 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 9 5 7 COUNTY TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE, SHOWN IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 25 ACRES. IT'S NEAR FM 4 82 AND THEN PSALMS QUERY ROAD. OKAY, THIS BESIDE IS ON THE AGENDA, IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? YES. GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. I AM TODD HOFFMAN AT 5 7 5 1 FM 4 82 BRAUNFELS, WHICH IS ON THE OTHER SIDE. I DID BRING A LITTLE SYNOPSIS ON THIS IF YOU WANT IT. THE NEXT PROPERTY WE'RE GETTING TO IS ALSO MINE. UH, THIS PROPERTY IS 100% IN THE FLOODPLAIN AND I BROUGHT THE FEMA FLOOD MAP TO PROVE IT. IF Y'ALL WANTED TO SEE ONE, I GOT ONE FOR EACH OF YOU. UH, AND IT IS 100% SURROUNDED BY QUARRIES THAT ARE NOT IN THE CITY OF CHARLOTTES. MY HOMESTEAD IS RIGHT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF 4 82, WHICH IS NOT IN THE CITY OF ARDS, IT IS IN THE BRAUNFELS ETJ. SO DOWN THE ROAD WHAT'S GONNA HAPPEN IS MY PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET'S GONNA BE THE CITY OF SHEZ. MY HOMESTEAD IS GONNA BE IN THE BRAUNFELS, UH, CITY OF THE BRAUNFELS. THERE IS NO SERVICING THIS PROPERTY WHATSOEVER. IT IS USED FOR WILDLIFE. AND WHAT CONCERNS ME THE MOST IS IN MY WILDLIFE EXEMPTION WE HARVEST WHITETAILED, DEER, UH, AND PIGS AND COYOTES AND OTHER CONTROLLING METHODS. 25 ACRES IS NOT ENOUGH TO FIRE A FIREARM IN THE CITY OF SHIRTS. UH, NOW STATE LAW IS LESS THAN THAT AND I'VE UNDERSTOOD THAT STATE MIGHT UH, OVERRIDE THAT. YOU KNOW, THE PROPERTY RIGHT NEXT DOOR IS ANOTHER 25 ACRES, WHICH IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL PROPERTY OF MY GRANDFATHER'S AND THAT'S MY UNCLE'S. THERE AGAIN, IT'S IN THE BRAUNFELS ETJ. THIS IS ON THE VERY [01:35:01] END. YOU KIND OF GO THROUGH A LITTLE PENINSULA OF NOTHING IN THE CITY OF HERTZ AND GRABBING THIS LITTLE PROPERTY, IT CAN NEVER BE DEVELOPED. UH, BECAUSE IT IS, AS I SAID, 100% IN THE FLOODPLAIN. UH, THE ONLY WAY IT'S REALLY WORTH ANYTHING, POSSIBLY DOWN THE ROAD THE QUARRIES MAY BUY IT JUST 'CAUSE THEY LIKE TO HAVE THEIR BUFFERS. NOT WHILE I'M HERE, I'M NOT SELLING IT. UH, BUT IN THE FUTURE THAT COULD HAPPEN. SO WITH THE ACCENTUATING CIRCUMSTANCES AND I GOT LITTLE MAPS IF Y'ALL WOULD LIKE ONE. I GOT A HANDOUT FOR EACH OF YOU GO WANT IT. OTHERWISE THAT'S MY ARGUMENT ON THIS ONE IS THERE'S NO SERVICES. YOU CAN BRING ME MY HOMESTEAD'S ON THE OTHER SIDE. IF I GET ANEX, IT'D BE THE BROTHELS DOING THAT. SO IT KIND OF MAKES NO SENSE TO BE HALF AND HALF. OKAY. THANK YOU MUCH. THANK YOU SIR. OKAY AND IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL COMMENTS, QUESTIONS I MOTION WE ACCEPT ORDINANCE 24 A 41 SECOND WE HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 21, ORDINANCE 24 A 42. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 9 6 0 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES FM 4 82 FOR REFERENCE. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDAS, AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? YES, THIS ONE TOO IS I GUESS THE WAY WHAT THE OTHER ONE ALSO, THEY'RE BOTH UNUSABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL R TWO THAT Y'ALL ARE LOOKING TO DO. THIS ONE, THIS IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE RAILROAD TRACKS NEXT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS. IT'S NOT MARKED ON THE MAP AS A SEWER EASEMENT. THERE'S LESS THAN, AS YOU SEE IT GOES TO A POINT AND THE OTHER END IS LESS THAN A HUNDRED YARDS. THERE'S NO ROOM FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT ON THAT PROPERTY. SO IT'S UH, ANOTHER PROPERTY THAT Y'ALL CANNOT SUPPLY ANY SERVICES. HONESTLY, WITH MY AGRICULTURAL, NOTHING WILL EVER BE BUILT ON 'EM. YOU KNOW, THE MONEY IS NOT A BIG DEAL. YOU'LL BE GETTING ABOUT $9 A YEAR, BUT IT MAKES NO SENSE FOR THESE PROPERTIES TO BE IN THE CITY OF CHURCH. THANK YOU. Y'ALL HAVE A GOOD EVENING. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? ALRIGHT. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. GOING PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24. UM, A 42 SECOND. HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 22, ORDINANCE 24 A 43. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 12 ACRES KNOWN AS KMEL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 9 7 6 KMEL COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 12 ACRES FM 42 FOR REFERENCE. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. UM, ORDINANCE 24 A 43. SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND. GOODBYE. COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. NUMBER 23, ORDINANCE 24 A 44. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 107 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 0 1 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY IDENTIFIED HERE IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 107 ACRES FM 42 TO THE NORTH AND I 35 TO THE SOUTH. IT'S NOT ON THE SCREEN SO IF WE CAN GET THAT ON THE SCREEN [01:40:01] SO THE CO COUNSEL CAN SEE THE PROPERTY. OH, OKAY. THERE IT IS. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA, IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? UH, GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS SANDRA RAY. I WILL BE ADDRESSING ORDINANCES 24 A 44 THROUGH 48. UH, THESE FIVE ORDINANCE INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY 123 ACRES I OWN IN CO KAMAL COUNTY, WHICH I WORK AS ONE AGRICULTURAL OPERATION. AND I'D LIKE TO ADDRESS 'EM ALL AS ONE 'CAUSE IT IS A CONTI. THEY ARE CONTI CONTIGUOUS. IF IF IT WERE ALL GREENED IN RIGHT NOW, YOU WOULD SEE 'EM. UH, AS A LITTLE BACKGROUND, MY LAND IS PART OF THE ORIGINALLY BROWNFIELDS AND KAMAL SETTLEMENTS THAT WERE FOUNDED IN THE MID 1850S. SOME OF THE FOUNDERS WERE ACTUALLY SOME OF MY ANCESTORS. AND THE LAND HAS BEEN IN MY FAMILY OVER 170 YEARS WHEN IT'S PASSED TO ME, WHICH I'VE CONTINUED TO, UH, AS A AGRICULTURAL OPERATION FOR OVER 50 YEARS. AND I PLAN TO DO SO IN THE FUTURE. NOW I, I KNOW THE INITIAL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AND EXTENSIONS WITH THE CITY HAVE EXPIRED, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO GO ON RECORD THAT I DO NOT CONSENT TO THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. AND SINCE I PLAN TO USE THIS PROPERTY AS AGRICULTURAL AND THE LAND IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE ZONED BY THE CITY OF SHEZ AS AN A TOTAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST REMAINING UNDER A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT UNTIL SUCH LAND THAT I USE AND OPERATE ASS AGRICULTURE IS CHANGED IF I SELL IT OR DISCONTINUE IT. SO I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST JUST STAYING UNDER A DEVELOPMENTAL AGREEMENT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT AGRICULTURAL OPERATION CEASES. AND I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE OF AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHY I'M BUYING ANNEX INTO THE CITY OF SHIRTS VERSUS THE CITY OF NEW BROWNFIELDS. AS MENTIONED EARLIER, MY PROPERTY IS PART OF THE ORIGINAL NEW BROWNFIELDS AND KAMAL SETTLEMENTS. MY PROPERTY IS IN THE FOUR FAR NORTHEAST CORNER OF KAMAL COUNTY. MY PROPERTY IS LESS THAN ONE QUARTER MILE FROM THE NEW BROWNVILLE CITY LIMITS. MY, MY PROPERTY'S PROVIDED SERVICES LIKE WATER AND ELECTRICITY FROM THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS AND HAS BEEN FOR OVER 60 YEARS. UM, PLUS AS OTHER PEOPLE HAVE SAID, WHEN WE WANT EMERGENCY SERVICES OR FIRE OR LAW ENFORCEMENT, WHO USUALLY SHOWS UP AT MY HOUSE IS COMAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OR THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS. AND CLOSER TO ME IS THE BRACKEN FIRE DEPARTMENT THAN A SHIRTS DEPARTMENT. SO I, I ASSUME THE CITY OF NEW BROWN FALLS WILL CONTINUE PROVIDING ME THESE SERVICES AND IT WILL BE YEARS BEFORE THE CITY OF SHIRTS CAN ACTUALLY PROVIDE THESE SERVICES FOR ME. SO I WOULD, YOU KNOW, WONDER WHY AM I PAYING TAXES FOR SERVICES THAT NEW BRAUNFELS, THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS, WILL BE CONTINUING TO PROVIDE TO ME. SO I WOULD LIKE CONSIDERATION OR AT LEAST AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHY THE CITY OF SHEZ CAN DO THIS VERSUS THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS, WHICH IS, LIKE I SAID, A FOURTH OF A MILE FROM, FROM ME. NOW, ASSUMING THAT BASED ON WHAT'S BEEN HAPPENING THIS EVENING, I AM ANNEXED I WOULD LIKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH YOU THOUGH TO, UH, REASSESS THE AMOUNTS OF ALL MY TRACKS. UH, THEY DON'T ADD UP EXACTLY. AND SO IF I ANNEX, I WANNA MAKE SURE THE ACREAGE IN THESE, THEY'RE, THEY'RE BEING ROUNDED UP. UH, THAT'S PROBABLY FINE. YEAH, THEY'RE APPROXIMATE. MM-HMM, . SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TALK, YOUR TIME. AND I WOULD LIKE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION OF CONSIDER BEING CONSIDERED UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO, UH, ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL I MOTION, SORRY. MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR ORDINANCE 24. A 44. SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK COUNCIL. ANY, ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF NOT, CAN YOU PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE? WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 24, ORDINANCE 24 A 45. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 9 4 5 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRES. AGAIN FM 4 82 TO THE NORTH [01:45:03] WAITING FOR THE, YEAH, I SEE A SCREEN. WE'RE JUST WAITING TO MAKE SURE THAT, UH, IT'S, IT'S ON. I'M WATCHING. YEAH, BECAUSE IT CAME UP. OKAY, HERE IT IS. IT'S ON THE SCREEN NOW. 24 A 45. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL I MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24. A 45 GO HERE. SECOND. SECOND. HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK COUNCIL, YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 25, ORDINANCE 24 A 46. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 3.1 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 9 4 6 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 3.1 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN. AGAIN, FM 42 TO THE NORTH. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA, IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 46 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN CASSIDY VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 26, ORDINANCE 24 A 47. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 8.4 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 5 4 8 0 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 8.4 ACRES HERE, SHOWN IN GREEN AND I 35 TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? RIGHT. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL I MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24. A 47 SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. ANY COMMENTS? IF NOT, IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 27, ORDINANCE 24 A 48. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY FOUR ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 8 2 4 7 M COUNTY TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY FOUR ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN. AND THEN AGAIN I 35 TO THE SOUTH. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA, IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE TENANTS WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 48 SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY COUNCILMAN G MEMBER GIBSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD COUNCIL, YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. OKAY, GOT IT. I'VE BEEN ASKED TO SLOW DOWN . ALRIGHT, WE CAN GO AHEAD AND PUBLISH THE VOTE. YES. 7 0 7 [01:50:02] AYES NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 28, ORDINANCE 24 A 49. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 29 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 0 9 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 29 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN FM 4 82 TO THE NORTH. ALL RIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA, IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IS, UH, LET'S, ALRIGHT, UH, PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN, PLEASE. YES. OKAY. CHARLENE 5 6 0 2 8 FM 42 NEW BROWN FALLS, OWNER OF PROPERTY ID 79 0 0 4 79 0 0 6 79 0 0 9 IN OUN COUNTY. I OPPOSE THE ANNEXATION OF THESE PROPERTIES AND ASK THAT YOU DO NOT APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR ANNEXATIONS OF ORDINANCES. 24 8 49 24 8 50 AND 24 8 51 3 POINTS. FIRST, WE ARE NEAR THE NORTH EDGE NORTH SHIRTS WHERE IT MEETS THE CITY LIMITS OF NEW BROWN FALLS. OUR LAND AND AG OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN IN OUR FAMILY 134 YEARS IN ONE OF THE OLDEST FARMING COMMUNITIES IN THE COUNTY. IT CONTINUES TO BE USED BY FIFTH AND SIXTH GENERATIONS OF FIRST FOUNDERS OF NEW BROWN FALLS, NOT SHIRTS. WE WANT TO CONTINUE THE AG OPERATIONS AND OUR HERITAGE. THERE ARE NO DEVELOPMENT PLANS. OUR STRUCTURES INCLUDE THREE RESIDENTS, GENERATIONAL HOMES BUILT IN 19 27, 19 48, 19 87. ONE IS MY HOMESTEAD. TWO ARE MORE RECENTLY RENTALS. FOUR BARNS, TWO OVER A HUNDRED YEARS OLD, TWO METAL SHOPS, NINE SMALLER STRUCTURES, TWO CORRALS, AND A LOT OF FENCE. ALTHOUGH AG PROPERTY IS MINIMALLY TAXED, OUR THREE HOUSES ARE TAXED IN APPRAISED MARKET VALUE. WE ALREADY PAY TAXES TO AL COUNTY, AL ISD, EMERGENCY SERVICE DISTRICT NUMBER SIX AND ANNEX. WE WOULD NOW BE PAYING YOU, WE EXPECT OUR TAXES WOULD INCREASE BY THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, WHICH WE WILL HAVE TO PAY YEAR AFTER YEAR WHILE RECEIVING MINIMAL OR NO SERVICES. I'LL BE STANDING IN YOUR PERMIT LINE TOO. IT WILL BE COSTLY AND DIFFICULT AS TO THE STRUCTURES. WE WOULD LIKE TO PRESERVE THEM AND PROTECT THEIR INTEGRITY OF ANNEX. I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE PREEXISTING USES AND CONDITIONS ARE ACCEPTED AND THAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO MAINTAIN THESE STRUCTURES AND MAKE IMPROVEMENTS AS PRACTICAL. SECONDLY, ON THE MAP THAT WE HANDED OUT, SIMILAR TO THIS MAP, BUT YOU SEE ALL OF THE FIVE PROPERTY AND WE HAVE MARKED ON THE SIDE THE NEIGHBORS. AND AS YOU CAN SEE ON OUR PROPERTIES, WE ARE SURROUNDED ON THREE SIDES BY LAND HOLDINGS OF AGGREGATE OPERATIONS, CAPITAL AGGREGATES, DEAN WORD, LONE STAR WORD, RANCH ANDERSON. COLUMBIA IS NOW IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD TOO. YET IT DOES NOT LOOK LIKE ANY OF THEIR LAND IS BEING ANNEXED. SO WHY ARE YOU REACHING IN AND GRABBING US? I AM NOT HERE TONIGHT TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THOSE NEIGHBORS OR ASK FOR YOUR HELP. I CHOOSE TO LIVE THERE AND TRY TO BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR, BUT I AM HERE TO REMIND YOU THAT THESE NEIGHBORS MOVE DIRT CLEAR BRUSH BURN PILES, MAKE NOISE, HAVE 24 HOUR LATES AND BLAST. WHY MAKE ME SUBJECT TO YOUR ORDINANCES AND PAY TAXES, YET THEY ARE NOT. I ASK THAT Y'ALL DO THE RIGHT THING. PLEASE EXCLUDE MY PROPERTIES FOR ANNEXATION TWO. AND LASTLY, IN 2010, WE SIGNED THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AS A WAY TO DEFERRED ANNEXATION FOR 10 YEARS. IF WE DID NOT SIGN OUR PROPERTIES WOULD'VE BEEN ANNEXED IMMEDIATELY. OF COURSE WE OPTED FOR THE DEFERRAL, NOT COMPLETELY RECOGNIZING WHAT VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION IS ALL ABOUT. BUT NOW WE DO. 14 YEAR LATER TIMES HAVE CHANGED, LAWS HAVE CHANGED. MAY I CONTINUE BECAUSE I HAVE TWO MORE PROPERTIES? YES. SHE, SHE HAS THREE PROPERTIES. I'M GONNA LET HER CONTINUE. OKAY. 14 YEAR LATERS. 14 YEARS. IT'S BEEN, TIMES HAVE CHANGED, LAWS HAVE CHANGED. A NEW LAW BECAME EFFECTIVE IN SEPTEMBER OF 2021. THIS IS JUST SEVEN MONTHS AFTER SIGNING THE EXTENSIONS [01:55:01] IN FEBRUARY OF 2021. THE NEW LAW THAT CAME INTO EFFECT SHORT TIME AFTER WE SIGNED REQUIRED THAT DISCLOSURES HAD TO BE MADE TO LANDOWNERS SAYING THAT A LANDOWNER IS NOT REQUIRED TO ENTER INTO AN, IN A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THE NEW LAW BASICALLY VOID THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IF THE CITY DID NOT MAKE THE REQUIRED DISCLOSURES. SO ALL I'M ASKING IS LET'S MOVE FORWARD. LET'S DO THE RIGHT THING. GET IN THE SPIRIT OF THE NEW LAW, THE CURRENT LAW WHERE THE LANDOWNER GETS TO CHOOSE WHETHER TO BE ANNEXED OR NOT. IN FACT, THE LAW EVEN HINTS AT BEING RETROACTIVE. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE LOOK INTO THE NEW LAW AND EXPLAIN TO US WHAT DISCLOSURES HAVE BEEN MADE TO LANDOWNERS. WHY WE WERE ASKED TO SIGN AN EXTENSION SEVEN MONTHS BEFORE A NEW LAW WAS COMING OUT AND WHAT IT MEANS TO THIS CURRENT ANNEXATION PROCESS. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION AND TRUST THAT Y'ALL WILL DO THE RIGHT THING. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNSEL? THANK YOU, COUNSEL. THANK YOU MAYOR. I'M TIMOTHY FI. I LIVE AT THE SAME RESIDENCE, 6 0 2 8 FM 42. MY WIFE SPOKE FIRST. UM, I JUST WANT TO ADD A FEW COMMENTS. I THINK SHE COVERED IT VERY WELL. UM, OUR PROPERTY, AS SHE MENTIONED, HAS HAD THE SAME USE AS LONG AS THE, UM, AS OUR ANCESTORS HAVE SETTLED THAT PROPERTY. WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF CHANGING THAT USE IN ANY WAY. UM, YOU KNOW, THE, OBVIOUSLY IT LOOKS LIKE THE VOTE IS NOT GOING IN THE FAVOR OF THE CITIZENS, OR IN THIS CASE US. IF IT DOES GET ANNEXED, I DO COMPLIMENT YOU ON ADDING THE AMENDMENT TO THE PART THREE, YOU KNOW, THE SHIRT'S CODE OF ORDINANCE. UH, WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE WAY WE DO AND, AND, AND HAVE OUR CHOICE OF HOW WE USE THAT PROPERTY AS WE HAVE FOR MANY YEARS. UM, YOU KNOW, OUR PARENTS, OUR ANCESTORS, THEY'VE MANAGED TO DO WHAT THEY CAN TO MAKE ENDS MEET, TO USE THAT PROPERTY. WE HAVE HOMES OUT THERE THAT WERE USED BY PREVIOUS GENERATIONS FAMILY MEMBERS. WE RENT THEM TO OUR OWN FAMILY. BUT SOMETIMES DEPENDING ON THE GENERATIONS AS THEY MATURE, YOU KNOW, YOU MAY HAVE SOMEONE THAT WANTS TO RENT THAT, THAT'S A MORE DISTANT FAMILY. SO I THINK THAT ONE CLAUSE, AND THERE'S A LITTLE QUESTIONABLE FOR US, BUT WE'LL CONTINUE TO USE THOSE HOMES AS WE HAVE BEEN USING THEM. AND WE ASK THAT THE CITY SUPPORT US IN THAT USE SINCE WE'RE NOT PLANNING TO CHANGE OUR USAGE. UM, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THIS DEVELOPMENTAL AGREEMENT, WHICH WE'RE OPPOSED TO, AS MY WIFE HAD MENTIONED, BUT IF IT IS, WE DON'T HAVE THE, WE DON'T WANNA SPEND ALL OUR LIFE SAVINGS FIGHTING THE CITY, WHICH HAS ENDLESS FUNDS AS WE HEARD EARLIER. THEY'RE WILLING TO JUST KEEP RAISING THE DEBT CEILING ON THE CITY BY SELLING MORE BONDS, BUT, UM, REMAIN IN A DEVELOPMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH US UNTIL YOU CAN PROVIDE THE SERVICES TO US. AND THEN WE TALK ABOUT THE MASTER PLAN, UH, THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED AND DISCUSSED BY YOU. MANY TIMES. THIS DATES BACK TO WHEN MR. HAL BALDWIN WAS THE MAYOR, AND HE SAT IN THIS VERY CHAIR AND HE SAID, YOU GUYS DON'T WANT TO CHANGE THE USE OF YOUR LAND. WE'VE HEARD THAT SO MANY TIMES, BUT YOUR CHILDREN WILL CHANGE IT. WE'RE TELLING YOU OUR CHILDREN HAVE NO PLANS AND WE'RE STILL ALIVE 14 YEARS LATER. WE HAVE NO PLANS TO CHANGE THE USE. WE ASK YOU, DO NOT ANNEX US. LEAVE US ALONE. AND IF YOU DO DECIDE TO KEEP OUR DEVELOPMENTAL AGREEMENT IN PLACE, JUST LET'S LEAVE IT IN PLACE UNTIL THERE'S A, A WAY THAT YOU CAN PROVIDE US ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND THAT WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE MASTER PLAN AT THAT TIME. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? I JUST WANNA SAY THAT I'M, UH, I'M DEVASTATED. UM, TO SEE SO MANY PEOPLE HERE. I THOUGHT I WAS LOSING EVERYTHING. AND I SEE GENERATION AFTER GENERATION OF, UH, NEIGHBORS THAT ARE LOSING OR THEY, UH, PERCEIVE IT AS LOSING THEIR WAY OF LIFE. UM, I DON'T SEE THAT THERE'S A TRANSITIONAL PHASE FOR THEM TO ACTUALLY EASE INTO THIS WHOLE PROCESS. IT'S, I DON'T SEE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND IMMINENT DOMAIN, ALTHOUGH I KNOW IT'S A PROCESS LEGALLY. UM, WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE WHEN THERE'S INTEREST GROUPS OR, YOU KNOW, IN SOME CASES, [02:00:01] UH, DEVELOPER'S MONEY. AND I UNDERSTAND IF IT'S A BENEFIT OF MORE THAN BY ALL MEANS, BUT IN SOME OF THESE CASES, SOME OF THESE LANDS THAT ARE IN FLOOD PLAINS, MY PIECE OF LAND, IT'S NOT GONNA SERVE ANYONE ANY GOOD. SO I DON'T SEE WHAT THE PURPOSE OF TAKING OVER LAND. UH, AND I DON'T EVEN KNOW IF IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE BECAUSE IT'S ALMOST SEEMS LIKE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE. UH, AND EVEN THOUGH IT'S SET UP TO BE IN AN INDIVIDUAL, UM, YOU KNOW, TAKING IT INDIVIDUALLY, IT DOESN'T REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE. I MEAN, LISTENING TO SOME OF THESE PEOPLE OR THE FOUNDERS OF NEW BRAUNFELS, UM, I MEAN, IT IT'S UPSETTING AND I UNDERSTAND THIS IS PART OF THE PROCESS AND I'M ALL FOR THE PROCESS. HOWEVER, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE, UH, I KNOW IT'S NOT THE COURT SYSTEM, BUT IT'S ALMOST BROKEN. IT SEEMS LIKE EVERY SINGLE THING IS BROKEN. AND, AND I SEE THE WAY OF LIFE OF SOME OF THESE PEOPLE'S, UH, CHANGING. AND I, IT'S, I IT'S HARD FOR ME AND I'M YOUNGER THAN SOME OF THESE FOLKS HERE. IT'S HARD FOR ME TO ADAPT. AND I, I STARTED TO THINK THAT MY FAMILY THAT OWNS LAND IN MEXICO, THAT USED TO OWN LAND ALL THE WAY INTO TEXAS ALMOST HAS MORE RIGHTS THAN WE DO HERE IN THE UNITED STATES. AND IT'S, IT'S SAD BECAUSE, I MEAN, IT'S, IT'S JUST SAD TO SEE IT. AND I UNDERSTAND Y'ALL HAVE A JOB TO DO, SO I DON'T BLAME Y'ALL. I UNDERSTAND YOU DON'T HAVE TO FEED FAMILIES AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. UM, BUT I DO HOPE THAT YOU KNOW, YOUR CHILDREN AND MY CHILDREN DON'T GIVE UP ON THE SYSTEMS JUST BECAUSE INTEREST GROUPS OR WHATEVER IT IS. UH, ESPECIALLY WHEN, IN MY CASE, MY LAND'S NOT GONNA SERVE ANY PURPOSE TO ANYONE ELSE. I CAN'T SHOOT A SNAKE IN MY PROPERTY BECAUSE I HAVE NEIGHBORS THAT ARE MOVING IN FROM OTHER STATES THAT ARE AGAINST GUNS, UH, COMING IN, HARASSING MY KIDS OVER THINGS LIKE THAT. AND IT'S, IT'S A SHAME, UH, THAT I'M NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO DO SOME OF THOSE THINGS AND DEFEND MY FAMILY THE WAY WE WERE RAISED. SO I KNOW YOU'LL HAVE A JOB TO DO. DECISION'S ALREADY MADE. UM, I DON'T WANNA WASTE ANY MORE OF YOUR TIME AND MY CHILDREN'S TIME. MY OTHER DAUGHTER IS ACTUALLY, UH, JUST GOT VOTED INTO BE VICE PRESIDENT OF A GROUP. SHE'S ONLY 10. SHE'S THE YOUNGEST ONE IN THE GROUP. SO I THINK I HAVE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO DO THAN TO WASTE HER TIME AND MY TIME WITH SOMETHING THAT'S ALREADY PREDESTINED. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS, TO COUNSEL? YEAH, MY NAME'S LLOYD FAIRLEY. UH, I RESIDE AT, I DON'T RESIDE. MY PROPERTY'S AT 12 3 12 2 90 LOWER SEIN ROAD. IT'S ITEM NUMBER 93 ON YOUR AGENDA. I WANTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THESE FOLKS 'CAUSE THEY DID BRING UP THE ISSUE THAT, AND I SEE THE PATTERN OVER AND OVER AGAIN. YOU KNOW, SEVERAL OF THESE AGENDA ITEMS. THE CITY IS JUST NOT PROVIDING THE SERVICES THAT THEY WERE CONTRACTED TO SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. GUYS, YOU KNOW, THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, IT'S REQUIRED BY THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE TO PROVIDE SERVICES AND THE SERVICES ARE NOT OPTIONAL AND THEY ARE COMPLETE. AND EVEN FOR MY PROPERTY, THE CITY'S NOT PROVIDING THAT SERVICE, NOT ALL OF THEM. I HAVE FIRE PROTECTION, I HAVE POLICE PROTECTION. I HAD THAT BEFORE THE CITY CAME. UM, BUT SOME OF THESE PROPERTIES LIKE ITEM NUMBER 44, THE CITY'S NOT PROVIDING ANYTHING. SO YOU GUYS ARE UNLAWFULLY ANNEXING THESE PROPERTIES BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT, YOU'RE NOT FULFILLING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT THEY SIGNED. AND THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS THE ONLY WAY YOU'RE ABLE TO ANNEX THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE VOLUNTARY. THE DOCUMENT DOESN'T EVEN HAND THE PHRASE, HAVE THE PHRASE IN IT THAT THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIRES, WHICH IS THAT THIS IS A TOTALLY VOLUNTARY PROCESS. IT'S NOT IN THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. IF IT WAS PROBABLY HALF THE PEOPLE WOULDN'T HAVE SIGNED IT. BUT THESE, THESE, THESE PEOPLE, THEY'RE NOT GETTING THE CITY SERVICES THAT THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN. THAT'S MY POINT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNCIL POINT? ONCE POINT TWICE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24. A 49 SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. OKAY. WE HAVE UH, IF YOU CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SIX YAYS. ONE OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. [02:05:08] ITEM 29, ORDINANCE 24 A 50. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 68 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 0 6. COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE OUTLINED IN GREEN. IT IS APPROXIMATELY 68 ACRES AND YOU CAN SEE FM 42 TO THE SOUTH. YEAH. ALRIGHT. UH, THIS IS A OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WE WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? YES. CHARLENE FAY. 6 0 2 8 FM 4 82. I KNOW I'M IN NEGATIVE MINUTES WITH YOU ON THIS ONE, BUT I JUST WANNA GO ON RECORD AS ALL MY COMMENTS AND ISSUES THAT WERE DISCUSSED IN THE PRIOR ORDINANCE. I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THAT THEY ARE REPEATED FOR THIS. AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADD AGAIN, THAT IF YOU WE'RE TRYING TO BE REASONABLE, AND I KNOW Y'ALL ARE REASONABLE AND I RESPECT THE JOB YOU'RE TRYING TO DO WITH YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CONTROLLING THE LAND UNITS, BUT IF OUR LAND HAS, IS NOT READY TO BE DEVELOPED AND IF WE'RE BEGGING YOU TO PLEASE NOT ANNEX IT, UM, PLEASE GET IN THE SPIRIT OF THAT NEW LAW AND, AND DO NOT ANN ACCESS. AND, UH, WE'D BE VERY HAPPY TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY IF THERE IS THAT OF EXTENDING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. IF THAT GIVES YOU MORE ASSURANCE THAT WE DON'T DO ANYTHING, YOU KNOW, OUTTA LINE OUT THERE. WE WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE THAT OPPORTUNITY IF Y'ALL COULD CONSIDER SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THAT'S ALL. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS? COUNSEL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24. A 52ND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. NOW BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD, I, I, I KNOW SOME OF THESE, UH, SOME OF YOU ARE HERE, THEY'RE STILL CLOSE TO 80 OF THESE, UH, ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH, BUT I'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE ONES THAT ARE HERE IN ATTENDANCE. UH, I THINK, UH, YOU, YOU STILL HAVE ONE, ONE PROPERTY, RIGHT? IS THERE ANYONE ELSE FROM KAMAL COUNTY THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS? OKAY, SO WE'LL FINISH UP KAMAL COUNTY AND THEN WE'LL GO TO THE INDIVIDUAL PROPERTIES IN, UH, IN BEAR COUNTY. UH, SO THAT, UH, WE CAN, I DON'T WANT YOU TO STAY HERE, YOU KNOW, UNTIL WE REACHED YOUR, YOUR PROPERTY. SO WE'RE GONNA MOVE THOSE FORWARD SO WE CAN GO AHEAD AND READ NUMBER 30. NUMBER 30, ORDINANCE 24 A 51, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 0 4 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY SHOWN HERE IN GREEN, FIVE ACRES AGAIN, FM 42. AND THEN MAYOR, IF WE CAN JUST CONFIRM THAT NOBODY'S HERE FOR GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTIES EITHER BEFORE WE MOVE TO BAYER JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT OKAY. SKIPPING WE'LL AHEAD. GUADALUPE COUNTY AFTER COMA. ALRIGHT, THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO, UH, ADDRESS TO COUNSEL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? YES, CHARLENE FI 6 0 2 8 FM 4 82. THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS WHERE MY HOME IS AT AND AGAIN, I DO NOT WANNA BE ANNEXED. I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE DO NOT PROCEED WITH THE ANNEXATION, UH, FOR ALL THE REASONS THAT HAVE GIVEN PREVIOUSLY ON THE TWO ORDINANCES BEFORE THIS. THANK YOU. OKAY, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNSEL? ALRIGHT, PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL A MOTION. WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 51 SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNSEL, I JUST CLEARED IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS, MOTION PASSES. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE FROM [02:10:01] AL COUNTY THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS? IS THERE ANYONE HERE FROM UH, GUADALUPE COUNTY? NO ONE FROM GUADALUPE COUNTY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO STRAIGHT TO SINE UH, TOSIN, UH, BEAR COUNTY. UH, WHAT PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS DO WE HAVE, SIR, IF, UH, DO YOU HAVE A NUMBER ON YOURS? 75. 75 IF WE CAN, UH, MAYOR PRO TEM, IF YOU CAN READ NUMBER 75. OKAY. 75 ORDINANCES 24 A 96. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 33 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 0 4 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING. OKAY, SO IF YOU'LL, OKAY, IS THE OVERHEAD WORKING MS. O'CONNELL PICKING UP? YEAH, WE'RE GOOD. WE'RE GOOD. OKAY. OKAY, SO IF COUNSEL WILL BEAR WITH ME, I HAVE DIFFERENT INTRO SLIDES FOR BEXAR COUNTY BECAUSE THERE WAS A DIFFERENT RESOLUTION NUMBER. SO IF I CAN GO THROUGH THOSE FIRST INTRO SLIDES AND THEN GO, I'LL SKIP TO THIS SPECIFIC PROPERTY ID. OKAY, WELL WE'LL DO THAT JUST SO IT'S ON, ON THE RECORD. SO BACKGROUND AGAIN, ANNEXATION OF LAND CITY'S CORPORATE LIMITS MAY BE VOLUNTARY INVOLUNTARY. THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE PROVIDES REQUIREMENTS AND OUTLINES THE ANNEXATION PROCESS ON THE ANNEXATION TYPE. THE PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS ARE VOLUNTARY BASED ON THE DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS THAT WERE ORIGINALLY ENTERED INTO IN 2010 AND 2011 AND THE EXTENSIONS THAT WERE OFFERED IN 2020 AND 2021. THUS CHAPTER 43, SUB CHAPTER C3 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE APPLIES AND AGAIN, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 2148 INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR PROCESSING OF VOLUNTARY ANNEXATIONS IN 2010 AND 2011. THE CITY ASSURES ENTERED INTO DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS BASED ON TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 43.016 PER THE AGREEMENTS THAT WERE SIGNED AND EXECUTED. SPECIFICALLY SECTION FIVE ANNEXATION AT END OF TERM STIPULATES THAT 10 YEARS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AGREEMENT THE PROPERTY IS TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY. AND AGAIN, 20 20 20 21, WE WERE AUTHORIZED TO OFFER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS BASED ON COVID. IN ADDITION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS WOULD ALLOW CITY STAFF TO COMPLETE THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. THESE EXPENSES WOULD PROVIDE THE SAME RIGHTS AS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED AND THE PROHIBITION ON ANNEXATIONS WOULD BE IN EFFECT UNTIL JANUARY 1ST, 2024 AT WHICH TIME THE CITY ASSERTS WOULD BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS. AGAIN AT THIS TIME, THE FIRST DATE IDENTIFIED IN THE AGREEMENT JANUARY 1ST HAS PASSED AND WITH THE APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 S OH SIX, THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN HAS BEEN ADOPTED AND CAN BE UTILIZED. RESOLUTION 24 R 42 WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON APRIL 16TH ACCEPTING PETITIONS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF 74 PROPERTIES, APPROXIMATELY 2,200 ACRES WITHIN BEXAR COUNTY, THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCES, 24 A 66 THROUGH 24 A 1 39 IF APPROVED. WOOD ANNEX OH 74 PROPERTIES WITHIN BEX COUNTY. AND AGAIN, THESE SLIDES ARE APPLICABLE TO ALL OF THOSE UM, ANNEXATION ORDINANCES. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DID HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ASSOCIATED ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ON MAY 8TH AND ON MAY 15TH. SPECIFICALLY FOR BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9 AND SIMILAR TO THE COLE ISLAND AND GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTIES, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED ZONING ALL OF THESE PROPERTIES. AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT OR AD EXCEPT FOR BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9 WHICH IS BEING PROPOSED AS GENERAL BUSINESS AND THAT WILL BE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. UM, THIS LATER THIS EVENING. ON THAT ORDINANCE, AGAIN, A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED ON MAY 24TH IN THE SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS. WE DID MAIL A NOTICE TO S-C-U-C-I-S-D AND IT HAS BEEN POSTED ON THE CITY OF INSURED'S WEBSITE. AND AGAIN, WE ARE VIEWING EACH OF THESE AS INDIVIDUAL PARCELS AND THEN THAT'S HOW IT WAS LISTED ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND IT'LL HAVE ITS OWN PUBLIC HEARING AND ACTION. SO HERE ALL OF THE PROPERTIES IN GREEN IN COUNTY THAT ARE PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION, ZOOMED INTO THE NORTHERN PORTION OF BEXAR COUNTY, SOUTHERN PORTION OF BEXAR COUNTY, AND THEN STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL. AND THEN IF YOU'LL GIVE ME JUST A MINUTE SO I CAN FIND NUMBER 75, CORRECT? 75 IS THAT 96 SIR? OR IS THAT 75? THE ACTUAL PROPERTY? 90 MM-HMM, I GOTCHA. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 75, WHICH IS 24 A 96. AND THERE IS THAT PROPERTY APPROXIMATELY [02:15:01] 33 ACRES. YOU CAN SEE LOWER SINE ROAD TO THE NORTH. THE PROPERTY OUTLINED IN GREEN. ALRIGHT, UH, ONCE AGAIN, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. UH, IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL, THE MIKE'S HERE, SIR. LOOKS LIKE YOU KIND OF SHINGLED ME AN ACRE OR SO, BUT, UH, MY NAME IS GARY FARLEY AND I LIVE AT 12 3 10 LOWER SEG ROAD. AND OUR FARM, MY SON AND I, THEY'RE OUR PROPERTY JOINS TOGETHER AND WE BOUGHT THAT LAND BACK IN 2000. WE'VE BEEN FARMING IT EVER SINCE I RAISED HAY AND I SAW IT TO A LOT OF THEIR LOCAL PEOPLE AROUND HERE AND SOME NOT SO LOCAL. THE ZONING IN HERE RIGHT NOW, I HAVE A SUBDIVISION ON MY BACKSIDE, KIND ENOUGH FOR THE CITY TO ALLOW 'EM TO PUT THE, UH, DISCHARGE FOR THE OVER POND ON MY PROPERTY. THEY DID MODIFY IT, BUT THE PROBLEM IS I DON'T HAVE ANY EASEMENTS ON MY PROPERTY. THERE'S NO DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR ANYTHING ELSE. I WENT TO THE, CALLED THE CITY CO, UH, TO THE CITY. TOOK ME TWO MONTHS BEFORE I FINALLY GOT ANYONE FROM ENGINEERING TO RESPOND. I TOLD HIM WHAT ONE OF MY PROBLEMS WAS, WHICH ARE THE DRAINAGE DITCH, IT'S HEADED RIGHT TOWARDS THE BACK OF MY HOUSE. DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING FOR A MONTH. FINALLY, I GOT A HOLE AND FOUND OUT HE WENT RUNNING TO THE DEVELOPER. DIDN'T GO TO ME, NOBODY'S COME TO ME. I HAVE FILED, TRIED TO DO IT THROUGH CUSTOMER SERVICE. OVER A YEAR AGO I SAW A SEMI DUMPING RAW SEWAGE INTO A MANHOLE ON RAY CORBETT DRIVE BY THE MIDDLE SCHOOL. I CALLED THE LADY AND THE LADY WAS REAL NICE. SHE DIDN'T KNOW WHAT DIVISION HANDLED IT, SAID SHE WOULD TAKE CARE OF IT AND SOMEBODY GIVE ME A CALL. I AIN'T NEVER RECEIVED A CALL, NEVER DID FIND OUT. NOBODY WANTS TO RESPOND TO THE PEOPLE THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ANNEX RIGHT NOW. WHY WOULD I WANNA BE IN THE ANNEX IF THIS IS THE KIND OF TREATMENT I'M GONNA GIVE? I FILED ANOTHER ONE WITH CUSTOMER SERVICE THIS TIME I PUT IT ONLINE. THAT WAY I DIDN'T HAVE TO KEEP WRITING MY NUMBERS DOWN ON THE PAPER. I WROTE IT IN, THEY SAID, OH, WE CREATED A WORK ORDER THAT WAS ABOUT A WEEK AGO. SO EITHER YOU GOT A LOT OF CUSTOMER SERVICE COMPLAINTS OR SOMETHING ELSE, RIGHT? OH, YOU'RE DEVELOPING ALL AROUND ME, YOU'RE DEVELOPING THE CARMAC, WHICH WAS BEHIND ME. YOU'RE DEVELOPING THE OLD DONNY OFFICIAL PROPERTY THAT IS CLOSE TO ABOUT 1100 HOMES WHEN THEY GET THROUGH WITH IT. LOWER SAGA ROAD, ONLY HALF THAT WOULD BE 1100 HOMES, 2200 CARS, MAYBE A LITTLE MORE. YOU GOT THE RHINE SUBDIVISION ON IT. YOU GOT, UH, THE PEOPLE FROM GUADALUPE COUNTY THAT COME ACROSS THE BRIDGE. I, I DON'T THINK YOU NEED THE DEVELOPMENT. I MEAN, YOU DON'T NEED THE PROPERTY TO BE DEVELOPED. YOU COULD HAVE LEFT IT IN THE ETJ, LEAVE IT AS RA BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I DO AND I SELL THE HAY RIGHT OUT OF THE BARN. I DON'T DELIVER IT. THAT RA FITS IT, BUT I JUST DON'T SEE WHY YOU'RE OVERDEVELOPING THE AREA. AND YOU KNOW, AS WELL AS I DO ON THE CITY STAFF THAT YOU DON'T HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN PLACE TO HANDLE SOME OF THE SUBDIVISIONS. YOU GOT ONE OR TWO SUBDIVISIONS, LIKE THE ONE THAT'S HAULING THE RAW SEWAGE OVER AND THEN YOU GOT ANOTHER ONE THAT YOU GUYS ARE TAKING CARE OF. BUT I MEAN, EVEN IF YOU DO DECIDE TO ANNEX ME, ONE THING I WANNA SEE, BEFORE YOU ANNEX A PROPERTY, I WANT TO SEE A RELEASE OF CONTRACT THAT IS SIGNED, NOTARIZED, AND WILL BE RECORDED AT THE COURTHOUSE TO GET RID OF THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THAT'S WHERE IT'S AT. YOU GUYS HAD IT SIGNED, NOTARIZED, AND YOU RECORDED IT. NOW YOU NEED TO DO THE SAME FOR EVERYBODY THAT HAD THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. YOU CAN'T JUST SAY, WELL, OKAY, IT'S OVER WITH. UH, THAT DON'T WORK. I CAN'T TRUST THE CITY BECAUSE OF THE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S GOING ON AROUND IT. UH, THE CAN'T GET AN ANSWER OUT OF ANYBODY. ONLY IF I WAS A DEVELOPER, I THINK MAYBE I COULD GET A LITTLE MORE RESPECT, BUT I'M NOT [02:20:01] JUST A POOR FARMER. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADJUST TO COUNSEL? YEAH. LLOYD FAIRLEY, UH, 12 2 90 LOWERS THE GAME, A TRACK ADJACENT TO MY DAD. UH, YOU, YOU HEARD MY OPINION ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THE POSITION IS, YOU KNOW, I'VE BEEN ON A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR ALMOST 10 YEARS NOW. I WAS A CHAIRMAN A COUPLE YEARS. IT'S NOT AS MUCH FUN AS THIS MEETING. UH, BUT WHY WOULD I SIGN A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IF I KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT WHAT DEVELOPERS ARE DOING IN CITIES? WELL, YOU KNOW, 10 YEARS AGO IF YOU SAID, YOU KNOW, IS THAT A GOOD THING? I'D SAY, YEAH, BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT, CONTROLLING DEVELOPMENT AROUND ME IS IMPORTANT. MAKING SURE THAT MY PROPERTY IS PROTECTED FROM THAT DEVELOPMENT. AND THE CITY CAN'T DO THAT UNLESS IT'S ANNEXED. CITY CANNOT ENFORCE THEIR ORDINANCES UNLESS THAT PROPERTY IS IN THE CITY LIMITS. SO WOULD I JOIN FORCES WITH THE CITY TO MAKE SURE THAT MY LIVELIHOOD AND MY PROPERTY IS, IS, IS PROTECTED? ABSOLUTELY. BUT I'LL BE HONEST, THE LAST FOUR OR FIVE YEARS HAVEN'T BEEN THAT WAY. GUYS. FIRST OF ALL, THE, THE, JUST LIKE MY DAD'S SAYING IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO WORK WITH THE CITY SHIRTS. UH, MR. JAMES WAS, WAS HELPFUL ENOUGH TO US TO, TO GET SOME DRAINAGE INFORMATION SO WE KNOW WHAT WE'RE UP AGAINST. UH, BUT THERE IS NO DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE AREA THAT IS A REQUIREMENT BY THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE IS LAND DRAINAGE. AND ON TOP OF THAT, IN THE, UH, UH, I THINK IT WAS 2013, UH, CITY PLAN, ONE OF THE ARTICLE, ONE OF THE PARAGRAPHS IN THERE WAS THAT THAT'S THE BIGGEST CHALLENGE FOR SOUTH SHIRTS IS DRAINAGE BECAUSE IT'S SO FLAT. SO DRAINAGE IS GONNA BE THE BIGGEST CHALLENGE. THAT'S THAT COMING FROM THE CITY OF SHIRTS. AND YET THAT SERVICE IS STILL NOT THERE, THERE'S STILL NO GRAND PLAN FOR DRAINAGE. NONE OF THE CITIES REALLY HAVE A GOOD PLAN FOR IT. TRUST ME. I, I MEAN, I KNOW ON MY SIDE OF OF OF GUADALUPE COUNTY, THEY DON'T HAVE A GOOD PLAN AND IT'S DIFFICULT. DEVELOPERS WILL ONLY DESIGN IN THE DRAINAGE THAT THEY NEED AND THAT'S IT. AND THEN AS SOON AS IT LEAVES THEIR PROPERTY, IT'S SOMEBODY ELSE'S PROBLEM. THAT'S WHERE THE CITY'S GOTTA STEP IN AND PROTECT THOSE LANDOWNERS FOR THE DRAINAGE. I I ALSO DON'T LIKE THE CHEMICALS FROM THE SUBDIVISIONS. YOU KNOW, I WISH THAT THE CITY HAD AS MUCH ENTHUSIASM ABOUT PROTECTING THE WILDLIFE AND THE, THE, THE GREEN SPACE ON MY PROPERTY AS THEY DO FOR A STRIP MALL OFF OF 3 0 1. I, ANOTHER STRIP MALL LOOKS JUST LIKE ALL THE OTHERS. BUT THAT'S COMICAL TO ME GUYS, THAT WE WOULD SPEND SO MUCH TIME TALKING ABOUT A THEORETICAL STRIP MALL. UM, HONESTLY, I THINK THE CITY NEEDS TO BE A BETTER PARTNER TO THESE LANDOWNERS AND I WOULD'VE GLADLY BEEN UP HERE SAYING I VOLUNTARILY, UH, LET THE CITY ANNEX MY PROPERTY. AT THIS POINT, I DO NOT CONSENT TO THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. I KNOW IT'LL MAKE A DIFFERENCE, BUT THAT'S MY POSITION. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNSEL, IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 A 96. SO MOVED. SECOND. HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE, PLEASE. OKAY, WE PUBLISHED THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN ZERO MOTION TO APPROVE. OKAY, WHO ELSE DO WE NEED TO ADDRESS? WHAT NUMBERS DO WE HAVE? IF WE CAN GO TO ITEM NUMBER 80, NUMBER 80 24 A 1 0 1 ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 1. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 0 1 3 7 9 8 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING. HERE'S THE SUBJECT, PROPERTY OUTLINED IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA, IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WE'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL EVENING? HI SIR. MR. YOU GUYS RETIRED. IT'S BEEN A LONG NIGHT. WE ALSO HAVE 81. WE HAVE 80 AND 81. WE HAVE TWO FIVE TRACKS. OKAY. OKAY. UM, WE REALLY AREN'T, WE WERE AGAINST THE ANNEXATION MAINLY BECAUSE WE REALLY LIKED BEING OUT IN THE COUNTRY. WE BOUGHT [02:25:01] OUR PROPERTY IN 1976 FROM MOY MINCHA. IT WAS A MAYFIELD AND EVEN FROM THEN ON THERE HASN'T BEEN ANY DEVELOPMENT ON OUR ROAD. IT'S ALL HOW, IT'S ALL FARMLAND AND CATTLE AND THAT'S WHY WE BOUGHT THE PROPERTY. AND NOW I RETIRED THREE YEARS AGO. MY WIFE'S RETIRING IN TWO MONTHS AND I KNOW IT DOESN'T MATTER AT ALL, BUT IT, IT MATTERS TO US, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GONNA BE RETIRED AND WE JUST WANT TO BE LEFT ALONE AND JUST LIVE OUR, OUR LIFE IN AGRICULTURE. YOU KNOW, IT'S PASSING HOUSES AROUND YOU. THAT'S REALLY, IT'S NOT GOOD. AND I'M SURE THE PENS, HORNS AND THE SCHMITZ AREN'T HERE. AND THE, AND THE LIMENS AREN'T HERE, BUT THEY'RE ALL, THEY'VE BEEN ON THAT THEIR LAND FOREVER AND JUST DO THE RIGHT THINGS. I MEAN, WE JUST WANNA BE LEFT ALONE LIKE THE LADY SAID IN KAMAL COUNTY. WE JUST WANNA BE LEFT ALONE. WE UNDERSTAND PROGRESS IS NECESSARY, WE UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR Y'ALL TO JUST LET US LIVE OUT OUR LIFE, YOU KNOW, IN AGRICULTURE AND JUST BE LEFT ALONE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS IT? COUNSEL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 1 SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER. MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. UH, JUST CLEAR TO COUNCIL PLEASE. COUNCIL VOTE WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN ZERO WE MOTIONS APPROVED. ITEM NUMBER 81 MAYOR PRO 10. ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 2. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 2 2 2. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE, IDENTIFIED IN GREEN, 5.1 ACRES AND AGAIN, TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE SOUTH. THAT'S YOURS. OKAY. IT'S STILL PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU WANNA SPEAK AGAIN OR, OKAY. OKAY. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL, I MOTION THAT WE APPROVE. ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 2 SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN ZERO MOTIONS APPROVED. OKAY, WHICH ONES? ITEM NUMBER 93. ORDINANCE 24 A 104. ORDINANCE 24 A 104. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 6. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING, SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN, AGAIN, APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES. LOWER S ROAD IS TO THE NORTH. OKAY. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDAS OF OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNSEL, PLEASE UH, STEP UP TO THE, TO THE MIC AGAIN. UH, LLOYD FAIRLEY 12 2 90 LOWER SEG ROAD. UH, I JUST WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT I DO NOT CONSENT TO THE VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION, UH, UNDER THE PRE PREMISE THAT THE CONTRACT WAS NOT WRITTEN CORRECTLY. UM, EVEN THOUGH IT IS ON THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE'S WEBSITE, AND THEY PROBABLY SHOULD REVISE IT A LITTLE BIT BEFORE THEY USE IT AGAIN. UM, AND ALSO THAT THE SERVICES SUPPLIED BY THE CITY ARE JUST NOT UP TO PAR WITH WHAT THE CI THE STATE IS REQUIRING. UM, AND, AND I I WAS JUST SHOCKED AT HOW MANY OTHER PEOPLE ARE EVEN FARTHER OFF THAN I AM. I'M ONLY COMPLAINING ABOUT DRAINAGE. REALLY DRAINAGE IS A BIG DEAL FOR ME. IT'S PART, YOU KNOW, IT'S A BIG DEAL FOR MY FARM. IT'S IT, YOU KNOW, POLLUTANTS IN THAT WATER IS OR EVEN BIGGER DEAL THAT NOBODY PAYS ATTENTION TO ANYMORE. UM, BUT UH, THAT'S JUST MY POSITION. I OPPOSE THE ANNEXATION. I HOPE THAT THIS CITY BECOMES A BETTER PARTNER FOR THE LANDOWNERS IN THE AREA. THANK YOU. RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE YOU'D LIKE TO UH, ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? 24. A 1 4 4 SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNCIL, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. [02:30:14] FAIR COUNTY. MM-HMM. . OKAY. WHAT NUMBER IT WILL BE ITEM NUMBER 45. ORDINANCE 24 A 66. OKAY. ORDINANCE 24 A 66. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 6 4 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES FM 1518 TO THE WEST. ALL RIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? WE ONCE GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL REQUEST TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 66 SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COUNCIL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE RIGHT IF YOU CAN THEN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 46, ORDINANCE 24 A SIX SEVEN. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 14.3 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 4 1 7 3 0. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 14.3 ACRES. RALPH BURNETT TO THE NORTH. ALL RIGHT. UM, ONCE AGAIN THIS IS UH, AGENDA ITEM ON ON THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSE. NO. OKAY. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. ALRIGHT, COUNSEL QUESTIONS. MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 67 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE HELP ME OUT. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. NUMBER 47, ORDINANCE 24 A 68. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY NINE ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 7 7 2 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN, APPROXIMATELY NINE ACRES. DUSTY FIELDS CHINA HILL ROAD. ALRIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL I MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 68 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEMP BOB MACALUSO. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. I CLEARED IT. MM-HMM LET ME CLEAR IT. OKAY, IT'S CLEAR. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 48, ORDINANCE 24 A SIX NINE. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPRO APPROXIMATELY 2.33 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 7 7 3 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE SHOWN IN GREEN, DUSTY FIELDS TO THE NORTH. OKAY, THIS IS ON THE AGENDAS. AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL AYE. MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 69 SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY MAYOR PRO 10 MACALUSO. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. [02:35:01] DAVIS CORRECT THAT. DAVIS, I'M SORRY. THANK YOU FOR THE CORRECTION. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 49, ORDINANCE 24 A 70. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 35.4 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 6 2 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. IDENTIFIED IN GREEN APPROXIMATELY 35.4 ACRES IH 10 TO THE SOUTH. ALL RIGHT. UH, SO ON THE AGENDA FOR AN OPEN FOR PUBLIC HEARING, IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND ORDINANCE. 27. 24. A 70. OKAY. MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER, SORRY WATSON AND SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, PUBLISH THE VOTE. SEVEN ZERO ITEM 50, ORDINANCE 24 A 71. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 20.4 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 7 4 4 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 20.4 ACRES HERE. IDENTIFIED IN GREEN AT THE END OF DUSTY FIELDS AND THEN I 10 TO THE SOUTH FOR REFERENCE. OKAY, IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 71 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. UH, COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN ZERO MOTION PASSES. ITEM 51, ORDINANCE 24 A 72. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 0 5 0 2 0 3. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. IDENTIFIED IN GREEN APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES. DUSTY FIELDS. TRAINER HILL ROAD. ALL RIGHT. THIS IS ON THE UH, AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. COUNT PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 72 SECOND. SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. SECOND BY MAYOR PROTE MACALUSO. ANY COMMENTS IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WELL NOT ONE. ONE MORE WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 52, ORDINANCE 24 A SEVEN THREE. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 3.1 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 4 0 0 3 0 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE. 3.1 ACRES, DUSTY FIELDS TO THE SOUTH. OKAY, ANYONE LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARINGS CLOSED. COUNCIL I MOTION WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 73 SECOND THIS MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNCIL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 53, ORDINANCE 24 A SEVEN FOUR. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 12 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 4 8 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 12 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN, DUSTY FIELDS TO THE SOUTH TRAINER HILL TO THE EAST. OKAY, IS THERE ARE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARINGS CLOSED COUNSEL APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24. A 74 SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 54, ORDINANCE 24 A SEVEN FIVE. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 33 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 5 9 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING [02:40:01] SUBJECT TO PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN. 33 ACRES IH 10 TO THE SOUTH. OKAY, ANYONE IN IN ATTENDANCE? SLIDE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 75. SECOND. SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 50, ITEM 50 OH ITEM 55. ORDINANCE 24 A SEVEN SIX. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 4 1 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE APPROXIMATELY 15 ACRES. DUSTY FIELD. SO NORTH RE HILL TO THE EAST. RIGHT. UH, ITEMS ON THE AGENDA. OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE LIKE TO ADDRESS COUNSEL ONCE GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 76 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN JUST UH, CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 56, ORDINANCE 24 A SEVEN SEVEN. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 84.4 ACRES KNOWN AS BEX COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 5 3 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING IN GREEN APPROXIMATELY 84.4 ACRES. I ATTEND TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT, IT'S ON THE AGENDAS. AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS IT. COUNSEL PLEASE STEP UP TO THE MIC. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 77 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 57, ORDINANCE 24 A 78. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 7 7 8 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES. DUSTY FIELDS TO SOUTH TRIOR HILL TO THE EAST. ALL RIGHT. IT'S ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. ALLOW TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL YOU CAN STEP UP TO THE MIC. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. PROPOSE TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 78 SECOND MOTIONS MAY, MAY BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 58, ORDINANCE 24 A 79. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 1 2 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN LOWER SINE ROAD TO THE SOUTH. RIGHT. IT'S AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE. 24 A 79 SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNCIL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 59, ORDINANCE 24 A 80. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 0 9 8 4 2 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING EIGHT ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN. LOWER SEN ROAD TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT, IT'S AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS, UH, STEP UP TO THE MIC. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 82ND. UH, SORRY I DIDN'T CATCH THAT MOTION WITH COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY TIM BROWN. COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. OKAY COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE, YOU CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 60, ORDINANCE 24 A 81. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY [02:45:01] IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 1 2 5. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING, 9.2 ACRES 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL MIC IS OPEN, GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL OUR MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 81 SECOND. SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER MACALUSO MAYOR PRO TEM MACALUSO. COUNSEL LET ME CLEAR IT. IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 61, ORDINANCE 24 A 82. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 9 3 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE IS SHOWN IN GREEN, APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE EAST. OKAY, THE ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL, THE MIC IS OPEN ONCE GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 82. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. SECOND BY MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE 7 0 7 AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 62, ORDINANCE 24 A 83. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 80 78 0.1 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 9 5 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 78.1 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE EAST. ALRIGHT, IT IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL POINT ONCE GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARINGS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 83. SECOND HAVE MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. NO. BROWN. BROWN. COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND IT. YES COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 63, ORDINANCE 24 A 84. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 76.3 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 4 0 0 5 9 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 76.3 ACRES HERE IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 84 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. YOU HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. NUMBER 64, ORDINANCE 24 A 85. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 32.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEX COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 7 8 4 7 9 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 32.2 ACRES TRAINER HILL ROAD IS TO THE WEST. OKAY, THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO JUST COUNSEL THE MIC IS OPEN, GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. REQUEST TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 85 SECOND MOTION'S MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 65, ORDINANCE 24 A 86. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 7 6 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY THREE ACRES, PROPERTY IN GREEN TRINITY HILL ROAD TO THE NORTH. THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 86 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. [02:50:04] WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 66, ORDINANCE 24 A 87. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 69.3 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 5 9 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN 69.3 ACRES, TRAINER HILL ROAD AND WEIR ROAD. ALRIGHT IT IS A OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 87 SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEMP. AM I CORRECT? YES. OKAY. MAYOR PRO. TIM MACALUSO, IF YOU CAN UH, CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 67, ORDINANCE 24 A 88. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEX COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 0 9 4 1 8 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 10.2 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN AT SCHAEFFER AND RAF BURNETT. OKAY THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS IT. CITY COUNCIL MIKE'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 88 SECOND SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY MAYOR PRO, TIM MACALUSO. DAVID DAVIS. I AM SO SORRY. I OKAY MR. MAYOR. NO, NOT QUITE BUT IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE . IT'S GONNA BE LATER TRYING TO GIVE YOU ACT. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 68, ORDINANCE 24 A 89. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 81.1 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 0 9 4 2 1 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 81.1 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN RATH BURNETT TO THE NORTH. THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL REQUEST TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 89 SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 69, ORDINANCE 24 A 90. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 2 5 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 2.2 ACRES HERE IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE WEST. OKAY. IT IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL FLOOR IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 92ND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON IF YOU CAN COUNCIL CASS YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 70, ORDINANCE 24 A 91. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 63.3 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 8 4 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING 63.3 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE EAST. ALRIGHT, THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING AND IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL, THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 91 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 71, ORDINANCE 24 A 92. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 15.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 0 9 8 3 7 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING, 15.2 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN SCHAEFER ROAD TO THE NORTH. ALRIGHT, THIS IS IN THE WHEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADJUST THE COUNCIL, THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 92 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH [02:55:01] THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 72, ORDINANCE 24 A 93. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 0 3 0 9 3 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN. 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 93. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 73, ORDINANCE 24 A 94. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 1 1 1 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN FM 1518 WOULD BE TO THE WEST OF THIS PROPERTY. OKAY. THIS IS AN ITEM ON THE UH, AS A PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADJUST THE CITY COUNCIL. THE FLOOR IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 94 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 74, ORDINANCE 24 A 95. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 4 0 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING. APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE HERE SHOWN IN GREEN. 1518 WOULD BE TO THE WEST. OKAY. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL, THE MIC IS OPEN. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 95. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 76, ORDINANCE 24 A 97. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 2 2 5 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN TURNER HILL ROAD TO THE SOUTH. THIS IS IN THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION POINT ONCE GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 97 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER MAYOR PRO TEM MACALUSO. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN A NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 77, ORDINANCE 24 A 98. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 86 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 7 4 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 86 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN TURNER HILL ROAD TO THE NORTH. 1518 TO THE WEST. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 98. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 78, ORDINANCE 24 A 99. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 6.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 7 5 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 6.2 ACRES HERE IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE NORTH. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADJUST THE COUNCIL, THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 99. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON COUNCIL, YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. [03:00:01] WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 79, ORDINANCE 24 A 100. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 2 8 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE HERE SHOWN IN GREEN OFFICE OF SHIPMENT SCHMIDT CRAFT LANE 15 EIGHT TRAINER HILL ROAD. EXCUSE ME. WOULD BE TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 100. SECOND I HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNCIL IF YOU CAN CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 82, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 3. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 13 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 2 6 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 13 ACRES HERE IN GREEN, LOWER SINE ROAD TO THE NORTH. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL, THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 3. SECOND. SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS AND SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM ALISO. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 83, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 4. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 2 7 4 9 2 0. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FOR TRADING APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN SCHAEFER ROAD R BURNETT TO THE NORTH. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 4. SECOND. SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 84, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 5. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 87 ACRES KNOWN AS BERK COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 86 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY IDENTIFIED IN GREEN, 87 ACRES AND TRAINER HILL ROAD IS TO THE EAST OF THIS PROPERTY. AND JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, YOU'LL NOTICE THIS MAP IS THE SAME ON THIS SLIDE AND THEN THE NEXT FOR 24 A 1 0 6 24 A 1 0 5 IS SPECIFICALLY FOR THE LARGER 87 ACRES. ALL RIGHT, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE FLOOR IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 5. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 85, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 6. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS BEAR PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 8 5 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING. SO HERE IS THAT PROPERTY AGAIN SPECIFICALLY FOR 24 A 1 0 6 IS FOR THE ONE ACRE, WHICH IS THE UM, CIRCLE THERE. OKAY. ALRIGHT. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 6. SECOND. SECOND. HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 86, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 7. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.4 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 1 9 ME COUNTY TEXAS FIRST RATING APPROXIMATELY [03:05:01] 5.4 ACRES LOWER SINE ROAD TO THE NORTH. OKAY. THIS IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL, THE FLOOR IS OPEN, GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 7. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 87, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 8. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 3 9 5 3 0 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING ONE ACRE SHOWN HERE IN GREEN LOWERS ROAD TO THE NORTH. OKAY. THIS IS ON THE AGENDAS IN AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL, THE FLOOR IS OPEN. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 8. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST A VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 87 COORDINATES 24 A 1 0 8. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 3 9 5 3 0 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST RATING FREE. JUST DO THAT ONE. YEAH IF YOU CAN READ THAT ONE ONE MORE TIME. 'CAUSE I DON'T THINK WE GOT THE ACREAGE CORRECT. SO I THINK YOU READ 1 0 8 AGAIN. YES. SORRY. IT'S OKAY. OKAY. I'M SORRY THERE. ORDINANCE 24 A 1 0 9. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 43.3 ACRES. SAVE AND EX AND ACCEPT 2.1 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 0 5 6 9 6 7 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE IS SHOWN IN GREEN TURNER HILL ROAD TO THE WEST. OKAY. THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL, THE FLOOR IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL QUESTION? YES SIR. UH, THIS IS THE FIRST ONE I'VE SEEN LIKE THIS. WHAT DO WE DO WE MEAN BY WE SAY SAVE AND ACCEPT PLUS OR MINUS TWO ACRES. SO TWO ACRES OF THIS PROPERTY WILL, IF THIS ORDINANCE IS APPROVED, WILL NOT BE ANNEXED. SO TWO ACRES OF 1 0 5 6 9 6 7 WOULD NOT BE ANNEXED AT THIS TIME. AND WHY IS THAT, DAN? I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANNA BECAUSE IT'S GONNA BE PART OF A DIFFERENT AGREEMENT. OKAY. THANK YOU. UH, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 8. SO MOVE 1 0 9. OKAY. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 89, ORDINANCE 24 A 110. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES KNOWN AS BEARER COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 3 1. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE, APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES IN GREEN AT THE END OF SCHMIDT CRAFT LANE. OKAY. IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THE SUBJECT, THE MIC IS OPEN, GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL, MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 10. SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 90, ORDINANCE 24. A 1 1 1. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 16.4 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 7 8 4 8 0. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST RATING. APPROXIMATELY 16.4 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD WOULD BE TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT. THIS IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADJUST. CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 1 1 SECOND. HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. AND SECOND [03:10:01] BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 91, ORDINANCE 24 A 112. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 26 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 0 9 4 2 7. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 26 ACRES HERE IN GREEN LOWERS ROAD TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT, THIS IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL THOUGH MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 1 12. SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE IF WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE AND HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 92, ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 13. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 126 ACRES KNOWN BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 0 9 4 2 5 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 126 ACRES HERE IN GREEN, LOWER SGIN ROAD TO THE SOUTH. HEY, THIS IS ON THE AGENDAS OF AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL, THE FLOOR IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 1 3. SECOND. SECOND. MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 94, ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 15. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 197 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 0 5 6 9 6 6 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 197 ACRES HERE IN GREEN WEIR ROAD AND TRAINER HA TO THE WEST. OKAY, THIS IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT, THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 15. SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 95, ORDINANCE UH, 24 A 116. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 14.4 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 0 2. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY IDENTIFIED HERE APPROXIMATELY 14.4 ACRES LOWER SINE ROAD TO THE NORTH. ALRIGHT, THIS IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 16. SECOND WE HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES AT THIS TIME. POINT OF PRIVILEGE HAS BEEN REQUESTED AND WE'LL TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK. [03:16:18] THERE WE GO. . [03:21:12] ALL RIGHT. THE TIME IS NOW SIX UH 9 46. WE RECONVENED INTO OUR REGULAR SESSION AFTER OUR SMALL LITTLE RECESS THERE. SO, UM, 9 47 9 46. OKAY, WELL, UM, WE'RE BACK TO UH, ITEM NUMBER 96. MAYOR 10 COORDINATES 24 A 1 1 7. CONDUCT A A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 42 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 4 8 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 42 ACRES WEIR ROAD TO THE EAST. OKAY, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT, THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 17. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 97, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 1 8. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 3 1 1 5 6 5 BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS FIRST RATING APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES HERE IN GREEN TRAN HILL ROAD WOULD BE TO THE EAST. OKAY. THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT, MIKE SPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MORE, UH, MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 1 8 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE PUBLIC. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 98, ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 19. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 61 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 2 2 BEX COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 61 ACRES HERE IN GREEN LOWER SEINEN ROAD TO THE NORTH. ALRIGHT, THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL A MOTION TO UM, APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 19. SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE IF WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 99, ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 20. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 27.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 2 0 1 5 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 27.2 ACRES HERE IN GREEN WEIR ROAD TO THE WEST. OKAY, THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING [03:25:01] TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 22ND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON AND SECOND BY MAYOR PROTE MACALUSO. COUNCIL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 100, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 21. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 2 0 1 7 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 40 ACRES SHOWN IN GREEN ROAD TO THE WEST. OKAY. THIS IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE FLOOR'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 21 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. , WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 1, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 22. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.5 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 1 2 6 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING, 9.5 ACRES HERE IN GREEN. 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS IS A OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADJUST THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 22. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 2, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 23. CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 63 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 90 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING 63 ACRES HERE IN GREEN TRAINER HILL ROAD TO THE EAST. RIGHT. THIS IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. MIKE'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 23. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. IF WE CAN PLEASE CAST A VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 3, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 24. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 8 8 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING ONE ACRE HERE IDENTIFIED IN GREEN, UH, TRIER HILL ROAD TO THE EAST. OKAY IT IS ON THE AGENDAS OF AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL FLOOR'S OPEN GOING ONCE IT'S GOING TWICE, PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 24 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 4, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 25. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 101 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 7 9 0 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY ONE 101 ACRES SHOWN IN HERE IN GREEN TRA HILL ROAD TO THE EAST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADJUST THE CITY COUNCIL. THE FLOOR IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT ORDINANCE 24 A 1 25 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY MAYOR PAUL MACALUSO. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 5, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 26. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 11.2 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 3 4 [03:30:01] BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING 11.2 ACRES SHOWN IN GREEN OFF OF SCHMIDT CRAFT LANE TRAINER HILL ROAD WOULD BE TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS IS ON THE AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL, THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 26 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 6, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 27. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 2 9 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE HERE IN GREEN OFFICE. SCHMIDT CRAFT LANE. OKAY IT IS ON THE AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT UH, APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 27 SECOND MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 7, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 28. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES KNOWN AS BEARER COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 4 0 4 8 1 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN CHINA HILL ROAD TO THE EAST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 28 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WHAT? YEAH. 7 0 7 AYES. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 8, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 29. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY. IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 0 7 BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING 11 ACRES SHOWN HERE IN GREEN LOWER ROAD TO THE NORTH. ALL RIGHT. IT IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE FLOOR IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT ORDINANCE 24 A 1 29 SECOND MOTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 1 0 9, ORDINANCE 24 A ONE 30. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CON AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR A VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES KNOWN ASPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 2 0 0 8 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES SHOWN IN GREEN. LOWER SEG ROAD TO THE WEST. ALL RIGHT. THIS IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. LORD OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING, HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 3 0 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE IF YOU CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 10, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 31. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES KNOWN AS BEX COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 0 9 4 2 9 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 38 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN LOWER SEIN ROAD TO THE NORTH OR EXCUSE ME TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. UH, IF THERE'S ANYONE I'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. UH, THE MIC IS OPEN. WE WILL HOLD OFF FOR A MINUTE HERE BEFORE WE TAKE THE VOTE. BEFORE WE TAKE A MOTION. POINT OF PRIVILEGE HAS BEEN REQUESTED. OF COURSE MAYOR. [03:35:50] ALL RIGHT. WE RECONVENE AS AFTER THIS UH, SHORT RECESS. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? SO MOVED. ORDINANCE 24 A 1 31. MOTIONS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 11, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 32. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 44 ACRES KNOWN AS BEX COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 9 0 1 3 2 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 44 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN WEIR ROAD IS TO BE EAST. OKAY. IT IS ON THE AGENDA AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. THE MIC IS OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 3 2 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 12, ORDINANCE 24 A 1, 3 3. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY TAXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 193 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 3 2 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 193 ACRES HERE IN GREEN LOWER SINE ROAD TO THE NORTH. OKAY. IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADJUST THE COUNSEL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. MIKE'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION APPROVED. 24 A 1 33. SECOND SECOND. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 13, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 34. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.5 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 3 9 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 5.5 ACRES HERE IN GREEN FM 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 34. SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 14, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 35. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY SIX ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 0 9 0 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN. 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. THE MIC'S OPEN GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 35. SECOND HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 15, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 36. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.4 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 1 0 1 0 7 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN. 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, THIS IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL [03:40:02] MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 36 MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 16, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 37. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 11.1 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1 0 3 0 9 1 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 37 SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 17, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 38. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 2 0 7 5 6 0 BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN. 1518 TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 1 38. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON, IF WE CAN PLEASE CAST A VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM ONE 18. UH, ORDINANCE 24 A 1 39. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 13 ACRES KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ONE ONE TEN THREE ZERO NINE TWO BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST REGION PROPERTY HEARING GREEN. 1518 TO THE WEST. ALL RIGHT. IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE. 24 A 1 39. SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. WE CAN GO BACK TO ITEM NUMBER 31 IS WHERE WE LEFT OFF ORDINANCES. 24 A 52. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION. APPROXIMATELY 40.2 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 3 9 9 2 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 40.2 ACRES, UH, LOCATED NEAR ECKERD ROAD TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 52 SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBORO. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 32, ORDINANCE 24 A 53. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 47 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 1 6 1 4 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST RATING APPROXIMATELY 47 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN AT GREEN VALLEY AND ENG ROAD. OKAY, IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 53 SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 33, ORDINANCE 24 A 54. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 0.5 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 7 8 GUADALUPE COUNTY FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 0.5 ACRES HERE SHOWN IN GREEN FOR BASEY LANE TO THE NORTH. IT IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 54. DO I SECOND? DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. YES. SECOND. OKAY. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY [03:45:01] COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY MAYOR PROAM MACALUSO. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 34, ORDINANCE 24 A 55. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.6 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 7 7 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 9.6 ACRES HERE IN GREEN PROBY LANE TO THE NORTH. IT IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 55 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 35, ORDINANCE 24 A 56. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 73 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 8 2 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HEARING GREEN INGLE ROAD TO THE EAST. RIGHT. UH, IT IS ON THE AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 56 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 36, ORDINANCE 24 A 57. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 8 1 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRES HERE IN GREEN. ROY LANE TO THE NORTH. ALL RIGHT, THIS IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 57 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS OR MOTIONS APPROVED. ITEM 37, ORDINANCE 24 A 58. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 8.2 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 8 0. GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING APPROXIMATELY 8.2 ACRES HERE IN GREEN ROY LANE TO THE NORTH. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 58 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 38, ORDINANCE 24 A 59. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 13 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 7 4 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY SHOWN IN HERE AT THE END OF BIG JOHN LANE, ECKARD ROAD TO THE WEST. ALRIGHT IS ON THE AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 59 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 39, ORDINANCE 24 A 60. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 1 6 1 5 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY SHOWN HERE IN GREEN GREEN VALLEY ROAD TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT THERE THIS IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 62ND WE HAVE MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY MAYOR TEMP MACALUSO. COUNSEL IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 40, ORDINANCE 24 A 61. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.2 ACRES KNOWN AS [03:50:01] GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 8 4 GUANO, TEXAS FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN ENGLE ROAD TO THE EAST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 61 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM MACALUSO. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 41, ORDINANCE 24 A 62. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY ONE ACRE KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 8 5 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE SHOWN IN GREEN ENGLE ROAD TO THE EAST. RIGHT. IT IS ON THE AGENDAS. AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO JUSTICE THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 62 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY MAYOR TO MAYOR PRO TIM MACALUSO. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. COUNCIL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST THE VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. SEVEN NINE. NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 42, ORDINANCE 24 A 63. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.1 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 8 3 8 3 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING PROPERTY HERE IN GREEN ENGLE ROAD TO THE EAST. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA AS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 63 SECOND MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD COUNCIL PLEASE. CLASS YOU GOTTA CLEAR, I GOTTA CLEAR IT. OKAY. CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN. AYE. NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 43, ORDINANCE 24 A 64. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUESTS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 141 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 1 5 1 1 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST RATING PROPERTY SHOWN IN HERE IN GREEN GREEN VALLEY ROAD TO THE SOUTH. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDA IS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNSEL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 64 SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ITEM 44, ORDINANCE 24 A 65. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. CONSIDER REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 47 ACRES KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 1 6 0 9 GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING SUBJECT PROPERTY HEARING GREEN AT THE INTERSECTION OF GREEN VALLEY IN GREEN VALLEY. ALRIGHT, IT IS ON THE AGENDAS IN THE OPEN PUBLIC HEARING IF YOU'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL. GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. COUNCIL MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 A 65. SECOND HAVE A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD, IF YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE, I'M SORRY. UH, IF YOU CAN VOTE AGAIN. I, I CLEARED IT BEFORE WE ANNOUNCED IT. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS, IF YOU CAN VOTE ONE MORE TIME. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. UH, IF YOU CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. YES. MAYOR, BEFORE WE GO ONTO ITEM ONE 19, I WAS WONDERING IF WE COULD RECONSIDER ITEM NUMBER 16, UM, ORDINANCE 24 A 37 BECAUSE I WAS OFF THE DAAS. OKAY. IS THERE A MO, IS I TAKE IT AS A MOTION FOR ME? THERE'S A MOTION TO RECONSIDER. YES. OKAY. MOTION TO RECONSIDER. ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 8 37. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES KNOWN AS AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 7 4 1 4 5 AL COUNTY, TEXAS. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD SECOND BY MAYOR PROTE. MACALUSO. ANY COMMENTS? ANY QUESTIONS? IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO ORDINANCE 24 [03:55:01] A 37 GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. IT'S CLOSED. OKAY COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE GO AHEAD AND UH, CAST YOUR VOTE FOR ORDINANCE 24 A 37 CONSIDER MOTION. YEAH, IT WAS MOTION BY HAYWARD. SO MOTION RECONSIDER THE YES SHE DID. COUNCIL MEMBER MACALUSO. OKAY, WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. THE VOTE IS NOW SEVEN YAYS. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. RIGHT. COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK? YES. MAYOR I'D LIKE, YES. MAY I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDINANCE 24 A 49. THAT WAS JUST THE MOTION TO RECONSIDER. YOU STILL HAVE TO MAKE THE MOTION AND VOTE TO MOTION TO VOTE FOR HERS OR ACTUALLY TAKE ACTION. YES. OKAY. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? SO MOVED. SECOND. OKAY. YEAH, I'M SORRY. SO WE MADE THE MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND THEN WE HAVE TO MAKE THE MOTION TO VOTE ON THE ACTUAL ITEM. YES. UH, THE MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER. THAT'S CORRECT. THE FIRST VOTE WAS JUST ON YOUR MOTION TO RECONSIDER IT. OKAY. OKAY. YEAH. WHO SECOND? I DIDN'T CATCH A SECOND. COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD MADE THE MOTION TO APPROVE AND MAYOR PROTE MACALUSO MADE THE MOTION. SECOND. MOTION. OKAY. THIS IS THE MOTION TO PROVE ORDINANCE 24 8 37. COUNCIL, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS. NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. OKAY. OKAY. COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDINANCE 24 A 49. I HAVE A SECOND. SECOND. A MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK TO RECONSIDER. 24 A 49. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. COUNSEL, IF YOU CAN PLEASE UH, CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION. MOTION TO RECONSIDER. ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 A 49. CONDUCT A PROB A PUBLIC HEARING AND RECONSIDER A REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 29 ACRES KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 0 9 COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST RATING. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. SO IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL? WHEN ONCE GOING TWICE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 22. SO MOVED. 8 49. SECOND MOTION TO APPROVE IS MADE BY MAYOR PRO PROT MACALUSO. AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. OKAY, COUNCIL SENATOR THE VOTE YOU CAN PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES. NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ALRIGHT, SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO, WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER ONE 19. ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 S 22. CONDUCT A PRI A PUBLIC HEARING AND RECONSIDER REQUEST TO RESOLVE IN APPROXIMATELY 498.2 ACRES OF LAND TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R TWO KNOWN AS CON COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 7 9 0 0 4 7 9 0 0 6 7 8, 9, 7, 6, 7, 8, 9, 6, 0, 7, 8, 9, 5, 7. AND GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 6 8 3 7 4 6 1 6 1 5 6, 8 3 8, 4, 6, 8, 3, 8, 5, 6, 8, 3, 8, 3, 6, 1, 5, 1, 1, 6 1. 6 0 9 6, 8 3 8 1, 6, 8, 3 7, 8, 6, 8 3 8 2 6 8 3 8 0 6 8 3 7, 7 6 1 6 1 4 6 3 9 9 2. AND TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 132.6 ACRES OF LAND TWO GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT GB KNOWN AS ELL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 7 9 0 1 8 7 5 4 4 9 7 8 9 2 3 7 3 4 1, 4, 8, 7 4, EXCUSE ME. 7 3 4 1 4 6 7 3 4 1 4 5, 7 3. I'M SORRY I AM READING. [04:00:01] LEMME GO BACK AND UH, AND READ THE GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT GB KNOWN AS COLE MAIL COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 1 8 7 5 4 4 9 7 8 9 2 3 3 7 4 1 4 8 3 7 4 1 4 6 3 7 4 1 4 5 3 7 4 1 4 4 3 7 4 1 4 7 7 8 2 1 8 7 9 0 0 9 AND A PORTION OF 7 9 0 1 2 7 9 0 1 2. END RE ZONE APPROXIMATELY 262.9 ACRES OF LAND TO MANUFACTURING, LIGHT MANUFACTURING DISTRICT LIGHT M1 KNOWN AS PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 0 1 7 8 9 4 5 7 8 9 4 6 7 5 4 8 0 7 8 2 4 7 7 9 0 1 7 7 5 4 6 8 7 5 4 6 2 7 5 4 6 3 AND A PORTION OF 7 9 0 7 9 0 1 2 AU IN GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. FIRST READING MS. DELGADO FLOOR IS YOURS ORDINANCES 24 S 22 894 ACRE ZONING TO AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. EMILY DELGADO, PLANNING MANAGER. SO BACKGROUND, YOU'VE SEEN THIS. SO 20 10 20 11 WE ENTERED INTO THE ANNEXATION DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS BASED OFF OF TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE. THOSE AGREEMENTS WERE SIGNED AND EXECUTED AND AT THE END OF TERM STIPULATES THAT 10 YEARS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AGREEMENT, THE PROPERTIES TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY 2020 AND 2021. WE OFFER DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS, WHICH WOULD ALLOW CITY STAFF TO COMPLETE THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. IN ADDITION TO, UM, COVID BEING IN FULL FORCE AT THAT TIME, THE PROHIBITION ON ANNEXATION WOULD BE IN EFFECT UNTIL JANUARY 1ST, 2024 AT WHICH TIME THE CITY ASSURES WOULD BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS AND CONCLUDE THEM NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31ST. AT THIS TIME, THAT FIRST DATE IN THE AGREEMENT JANUARY 1ST HAS PASSED ORDINANCE 24 S OH SIX. THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN WAS OFFICIALLY ADOPTED AND CAN BE UTILIZED FOR ZONING CASES MOVING FORWARD. AND AT THE APRIL 16TH, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESOLUTION 24 R 41 WAS APPROVED ACCEPTING THE PETITIONS FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION ORDINANCE 24 S 22 IS THAT NEXT STEP IN THE ANNEXATION PROCESS. SPECIFIC IN SPECIFICALLY IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING A ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE APPROXIMATELY 894 ACRES WITHIN COLEMA AND GUADALUPE COUNTY ON APRIL 25TH, 137 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES WERE MAILED TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN A 200 FOOT NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS. ADDITIONALLY, PROPERTY OWNERS OF PARCELS INCLUDED WITHIN THE ZONING BOUNDARY WERE NOTIFIED PER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION TWO 11.006 COM ISD WAS ALSO NOTIFIED OF THE PROPOSED ZONING AS OF MAY 30TH AT 1:00 PM 12. RESPONSES IN FAVOR, ONE RESPONSE NEUTRAL AND 117 RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN THE SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS ON MAY 15TH. AND ADDITIONALLY, 43 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SIGNS WERE PLACED ON APRIL 26TH. IF A PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE IS PROTESTED IN WRITING AND SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF AT LEAST 20% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT OR IF AT LEAST 20% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND IMMEDIATELY ADJOINING THE AREA COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING, CHANGE YOUR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND EXTENDING 200 FEET FROM THAT AREA. THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE MUST IN ORDER TO TAKE EFFECT THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF AT LEAST THREE FOURTHS OF ALL MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL ACCORDING TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE TWO 11.006 D AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF THE PROTESTED PARCEL ACREAGE IS 22.95% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGER ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF THE PROTESTED PARCEL ACREAGE IS 1.62% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND IMMEDIATELY ADJOINING THE AREA COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGER ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND EXTENDING 200 FEET FROM THAT AREA. BASED ON THAT 22.95% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE, THE 3 4 3 FOURTH VOTE HAS BEEN TRIGGERED FOR THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THIS ACTION. WHEN THE ZONING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES WAS PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON MAY 8TH, STAFF PRESENTED A PROPOSED ZONING FOR APPROXIMATELY 498.2 ACRES AS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. R TWO A HUNDRED THIRTY TWO 0.6 IS GENERAL BUSINESS AND 262.9 AS A MANUFACTURING LIGHT DISTRICT, WHICH IS WHAT THE MAYOR READ AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE AGENDA ITEM LANGUAGE AND THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES THAT WERE SENT. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EXTENSIVE PUBLIC HEARING THAT OCCURRED IN THE DISCUSSION WITH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AT THE MAY 8TH MEETING, STAFF IS NOW RECOMMENDING ALL PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED TO BE ZONED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. THIS RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF IS CONSISTENT WITH RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, WHICH PROVIDED A FORTITUDE VOTE TO CITY COUNCIL TO ZONE ALL PROPERTIES [04:05:01] IDENTIFIED AS AD. SO JUST TO GET YOUR REFERENCE, HERE ARE THE PROPERTIES IN COMAL COUNTY. THE GREEN COLOR IS THE ZONING DISTRICT IDENTIFICATION ON THE MAP OF AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. AND THEN THERE ARE THE PROPERTIES IN GUADALUPE COUNTY. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT ZONING, WE USE UDC SECTION 2154 D FOR CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL. SO NUMBER ONE, WHETHER THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGES, ZONING MAP, AMENDMENT IMPLEMENTS THE POLICIES OF THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLAN, INCLUDING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. ORDINANCE 24 S 22 PROPOSES TO ZONE ALL SUBJECT PROPERTIES APPROXIMATELY 894 ACRES AS AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT OR AD BASED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. EXISTING LAND USES THE PROPERTIES LOCATION AND THE DESIGNATION ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS ADOPTED BY ORDINANCE 24 S OH SIX GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 6 8 3 7 4 6 1 6 1 5, 6 8 3 8, 4, 6, 8, 3, 8, 5, 6, 8, 3, 8, 3, 6, 1 5, 1 1, 6 1 6 0 9 6, 8 3 8 1 6, 8 3 7, 8, 6 8 3 8 2 6, 8 3 8 0 6 8, 3 7, 7 6 1, 6 1 4 6 3 9 9 2 ARE IDENTIFIED AS COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FEATURE LAND USE MAP, WHICH TYPICALLY AREAS CHARACTERIZED BY A MIXTURE OF HOUSING OPTIONS WITH SUPPORTING LAND USES. COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 7 9 0 0 4 7 9 0 0 6 7 8 9 7 6 7 8 9 6 0 AND 7 8 9 5 7 ARE IDENTIFIED AS DEVELOPMENT DEFERMENT, WHICH IS TYPICALLY UTILIZED FOR LARGE TRACKS THAT HOUSE HEAVY AND W HOUSE HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. MONT COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 7 9 0 1 8 7 8 9 2 3 3 7 4 1 4 8 3 7 4 1 4 6 3 7 4 1 4 5 3 7 4 1 4 4 3 7 4 1 4 7 7 9 0 0 9 AND A PORTION OF 7 9 0 1 2 ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE COMP PLAN AS LOCAL CORRIDOR, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS LOCALLY ORIENTED COMMERCIAL AND ENTERTAINMENT AREAS. TYPICALLY SITUATED ALONG MEDIUM TO HIGH VOLUME COLLECTOR ROADS. OMA COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 5 7 5 4 4 9 7 8 2 1 8 7 9 0 0 1 7 8 9 4 5 7 8 9 4 6 7 5 4 8 0 7 8 2 4 7 7 9 0 1 7, 7 5, 4, 6, 8, 7 5, 4 6 2 7 5 4 6 3 AND A PORTION OF 7 9 0 2 ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE COMP PLAN AS REGIONAL CORRIDOR, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT AREAS ALONG MAJOR THOROUGH AFFAIRS THAT SERVE POPULATIONS WITHIN THE CITY AND THE BROADER REGION. SO ALTHOUGH THE SUBJECT PROPER PARCELS HAVE DIFFERING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATIONS, THE PROPOSED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMP PLAN. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE COMP PLAN IS A GUIDING DOCUMENT FOR DETERMINING APPROPRIATE LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT TYPES FOR FUTURE VISION OF SHIRTS. HOWEVER, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EXISTING LAND USES NEED TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN REVIEWING ZONING APPLICATIONS. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS NOT BASED ON A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, BUT STRICTLY DUE TO THE EXPIRING DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. IF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES WERE PROPOSED TO BE DEVELOPED IN THE FUTURE, THE ZONING DESIGNATIONS WILL ALSO NEED TO BE REVIEWED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE COMP PLAN AND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP. SO HERE IS JUST A SNIP OF THE COMP PLAN THERE. SO NUMBER TWO, WHETHER THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PROMOTES THE HEALTH, SAFETY OR GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY AND THE SAFE, ORDERLY, EFFICIENT AND HELPFUL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. SO HERE'S JUST FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IS FOR AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. THE LOT WIDTH, LOT DEPTH. AND THEN AS PART OF PROMOTING HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE CITY SHOULD ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING USES, UTILIZING STANDARDS AND TRADITIONAL USES TO ALLEVIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS. AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE A BASE ZONING DISTRICT FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. RESIDENCES IN THIS DISTRICT ARE INTENDED TO BE ON A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 217,800 SQUARE FEET OR FIVE ACRES. CLUSTERING OF UP TO TWO HOMES MAY BE ALLOWED ON THE SAME LOT. SUBJECT TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. THIS DISTRICT IS SUITABLE FOR AREAS WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS PREMATURE DUE TO LACK OF UTILITIES CAPACITY OR SERVICE. AND FOR AREAS THAT ARE UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS OR POTENTIAL HEALTH OR SAFETY HAZARDS, THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES AND EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. THE MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS OR ARE UNDEVELOPED. THE PROPOSED AD WOULD ALLOW FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AND AG OPERATIONS TO REMAIN IN AN IN A CONFORMING STATUS. ADDITIONALLY, PER UDC ARTICLE SEVEN, A NON-CONFORMING USER STRUCTURE MAY CONTINUE TO BE USED, OPERATED OR OCCUPIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THE ZONING REGULATIONS BY WHICH IT WAS ESTABLISHED OR IN THE CASE OF ANNEX PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS UNDER WHICH IT WAS CREATED. THIS MEANS AS THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES CAN CONTINUE TO BE UTILIZED FURTHER EXISTING LAND USE AND PERFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE SEVEN. NUMBER THREE, WHETHER THE USE IS PERMITTED BY THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND THE STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO SUCH USES WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED. THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED, UTILIZED FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES OR UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION OF AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AD IS APPROPRIATE IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE LAND TO BE ANNEXED AND ZONED. SINCE [04:10:01] THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION ARE BASED ON CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMP PLAN AND WITH THE EXISTING LAND USES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES, THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTIES LAND USES WILL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION OF AD. AGAIN, HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE PROPERTIES WITH EXISTING LAND USES THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED NON-CONFORMING BASED ON THE PROPOSED ZONING. IF APPROVED UPON ANNEXATION AND ZONING, THE PROPERTIES WOULD BE SUBJECT TO THE CITY OF SHERTZ UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE CODE INCLUDING ARTICLE SEVEN. NUMBER FOUR, WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS IN ACCORD WITH ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PLANS FOR PROVIDING PUBLIC SCHOOL STREETS, WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY SEWER, OTHER PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES TO THE AREA. A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS MAILED TO CUOMO, ISD TO NOTIFY THEM OF THE PROPOSED ZONING AND THE CITY ASSURES POLICE FIRE AND EMS DEPARTMENTS HAVE INDICATED THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUESTS OR THE ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES WITH ANNEXATION AND PROPOSED ZONING OF THE PROPERTIES. THE CITY IS BETTER ABLE TO GUIDE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN, MASTER WATER PLAN, AND MASTER SEWER PLAN FOR THE CITY. ADDITIONALLY, THE ANNEXATION ASSOCIATED ZONING WOULD ENSURE THAT ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WILL MEET CITY STANDARDS TO ENSURE COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE CITY, WHICH ULTIMATELY WILL ENSURE THE SAFE, ORDERLY AND EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. ALTHOUGH NO DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE CURRENTLY PROPOSED FOR THE PROPERTIES BEING ZONED AS THIS IS A CITY INITIATED ZONING, IF DEVELOPMENT WAS TO OCCUR, THE WATER, SEWER AND ROADWAYS WOULD BE EVALUATED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. NUMBER FIVE, WHETHER THERE HAVE BEEN ENVIRONMENTAL OR ECONOMICAL CHANGES WHICH WARRANT THE REQUESTED CHANGE, NO, THERE HAVE BEEN NO ENVIRONMENTAL OR ECONOMICAL CHANGES. SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, ETJ AND UNDER DELAYED ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS. ZONING DESIGNATION WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY, HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EXPIRE EXPIRATION OF THE DELAYED ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS, THE PROPERTIES ARE SUBJECT TO ANNEXATION AND AS PART OF THAT ARE SUBJECT TO ZONING. NUMBER SIX, WHETHER THERE IS AN ERROR IN THE ORIGINAL ZONING OF THE PROPERTY, AGAIN, THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES HAVE NO EXISTING ZONING AS THEY'RE PART OF THE ETJ. NUMBER SEVEN, WHETHER ALL THE APPLICANT'S BACKED TAXES OWED TO THE CITY HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL. AGAIN, PROPERTIES ARE NOT IN THE CITY ASSERTS, NO BACKED TAXES ARE OWED TO THE CITY. NUMBER EIGHT, WHETHER OTHER CRITERIA ARE MET, WHICH AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL ARE DEEMED RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT IN THE CONSIDERATION OF THE AMENDMENT STAFF IS INSURED. ALL DUTY C REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET FOR THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE AND AT THIS TIME HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FROM PNZ OR THE CITY COUNCIL. SO DUE TO THE PROPERTIES HAVING DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AND EXTENSIONS THAT ARE EXPIRING AND ARE SUBJECT TO VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO ZONE THE PROPERTIES AT THIS TIME PER THE AGREEMENTS UPON ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE ZONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES AND PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLAN AND UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE RECENTLY ADOPTED COMP PLAN AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING LAND USES THAT ARE ACTIVELY OCCURRING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 S 22 AND AT THE MAY 8TH, 2024 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. THERE WAS AN EXTENSIVE COMMENTARY AND DISCUSSION ON THE EXISTING LAND USES OCCURRING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S DESIRES FURTHER LAND AND HOW THE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS WOULD'VE MADE THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTIES NON-CONFORMING IF THE ZONING WAS APPROVED. BASED ON THE COMMENTS PROVIDED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE DISCUSSION BETWEEN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS AND CITY STAFF, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ULTIMATELY VOTED TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AD FOR ALL PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED IN THE ZONING CASE. THE VOTE WAS FOUR TWO WITH CHAIRMAN OUTLAWING COMMISSIONER BRO WITH A NAY VOTES. THANK YOU MS. DELGADO. UH, THIS IS, UH, AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF THERE'S ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THE SUBJECT NOW GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE, PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. OKAY. COUNSEL FLOOR IS OPEN FOR DISCUSSION. I'D LIKE TO, UH, UH, MY MIND. , I WANNA MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT OR , UH, PASS ORDINANCE 24 S 22 SECOND. OKAY. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON. YES. IS IS THE MOTION TO BASED, IS IT, IS IT BASED ON HOW IT'S WRITTEN OR THAT TO, TO APPROVE IT FOR AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. OKAY. 'CAUSE THE ORDINANCE AS IT'S IN THE, AS AS IT'S IN THE AGENDA STILL REFERS TO UH YEAH. ALL THE DIFFERENT R TWO AND EVERYTHING ELSE. YES. SO WE WANNA CHANGE IT, APPROVE IT AS TO AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT FOR ALL 894 ACRES. THAT'S CORRECT. SO THE MOTION IS TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 S 22 AS AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT FOR ALL, ALL PARCELS. SECOND. OKAY. THE MOTION WAS MADE BASED ON, TO BE CLEAR, BASED ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING'S RECOMMENDATION OF AD FOR OTHER PROPERTIES. THAT'S THE MOTION THAT WAS MADE AND SECOND AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AT THIS POINT AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. OKAY. [04:15:01] ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO. YES. COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK OR THAT WAS FROM THE LAST TIME OR NO? DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT? YEAH, ON, ON NUMBER FOUR YOU HAD A COMMENT NO. ON NUMBER FOUR UP UNDER LAW ENFORCEMENT, I THINK IT WAS. MM-HMM. THAT ONE RIGHT THERE. SO POLICE, FIRE AND EMS DEPARTMENTS HAVE INDICATED THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST OR THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES. THAT SEEMS SORT OF BROAD, RIGHT? OR IS IT MEANT TO BE THAT WAY? I MEAN, I THINK THE CONCERNS THAT PEOPLE HAD TONIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE IS THAT NOT JUST TO RESPOND, BUT TO RESPOND IN A RE RESPONSIBLE AND TIMELY MANNER. YOU SEE WHAT I'M SAYING? SO IF THERE IS A, YOU KNOW, THE AVERAGE TIME TO RESPOND IN IN CHURCH IS TWO MINUTES AND THEN, BUT THE AVERAGE TIME TO RESPOND OUT IN A RURAL ZONE AGRICULTURAL ZONE IS MAYBE FIVE. YES, YOU'RE STILL RESPONDING, BUT THAT'S PROBABLY NOT THE SAME LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT OTHER PEOPLE GET PROPERTIES. YEAH, I THINK, I THINK MAYBE IT'S, IT'S CLEAR WHEN YOU LOOK AT SORT OF EVERYTHING THAT THE, THE AREAS THAT WE'VE GOT. SO THE AREA IN GRAY ARE THE AREAS WE ALREADY HAVE TO RESPOND TO. MM-HMM. . SO THESE AREAS ARE NOT SIGNIFICANTLY FURTHER OUT. UM, THEY'RE, THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, GENERALLY ADJACENT TO, AND AGAIN, IN LARGE AREAS SURROUNDED BY AREAS WE CURRENTLY RESPOND TO. THE OTHER THING I WOULD SAY IS THAT ALL OF THE FOLKS WHO GOT UP TONIGHT SAID THEY'RE USING IT FOR RE MAYBE A RESIDENTIAL HOME AND AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. AND SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU GET IS, YOU KNOW, IS AGAIN, WHEN YOU TEND TO NOT HAVE CONCENTRATIONS OF PEOPLE, YOU TEND NOT TO HAVE AS GREAT A CONCENTRATIONS OF, OF ISSUES RISING. AND SO AGAIN, THE, THE, LET ME KIND OF GO BACK. THE SITUATION HERE IS IN TERMS OF WHAT SHOULD THE ZONING BE? AD IS OUR LEAST INTENSIVE ZONING DISTRICT. AND SO IT WOULD STAND TO REASON THEN THAT WITH THAT LEAST INTENSIVE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPMENT, YOU WOULD TEND TO HAVE THE FEWEST NEED FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO SOME DEGREE THE LEAST ACTIVITY GOING ON AND THE FEWEST PEOPLE ON THAT PROPERTY. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE OR DID I GET TOO FAR RAMBLING? NO, SORRY. IT IT MAKES SENSE. I DON'T KNOW IF IT WOULD SATISFY A PERSON WHO'S LIVING IN THE GRAY ZONE. YEAH. I MEAN, WELL, AND, AND SO YEAH, LET ME, LET ME OFFER THIS UP. IT'S, IT'S SORT OF INTERESTING IF YOU LOOK AT THE AREAS, 'CAUSE I THINK YOUR QUESTION REALLY PROBABLY GOES TO SOME OF THE, THE DISCUSSION AT ANNEXATION. SO IF JASON IS STILL HERE AND HE MAY BE, MUCH OF THESE AREAS RIGHT NOW ARE IN ESD SIX AND SO WE'RE ALREADY RESPONDING OUR EMS TO A CALL UP IN THAT AREA AND FIRE WOULD BE AS WELL. YEAH, I, I JUST TO ADD TO WHAT BRIAN'S SAYING, WE ALREADY PROVIDE EMS SERVICE TO ALL OF THESE AREAS THAT ARE MENTIONED IN THIS REZONING AND AS WELL AS THROUGH EITHER AN AUTOMATED AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT OR A MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT FOR FIRE SERVICES. SO WE ARE ALREADY RESPONDING TO THESE AREAS AND WE ARE, WE ARE GENERALLY THE, THE PROVIDER OF PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. 'CAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION THERE RIGHT NOW. THAT'S RIGHT. AND ONE OF THE THINGS YOU HEARD ONE OF THE RESIDENTS SAY IS, WELL, THERE'S ZACH AND THEY COULDN'T FIGURE OUT WHO RESPONDS. RIGHT. SO ONE OF THE PROBLEMS WE HAVE NOW WITH THE CURRENT CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY IS, WELL, WHERE ARE YOU EXACTLY? ARE YOU IN THE CITY? ARE YOU IN THE COUNTY OR NOT SURE? RIGHT. ARE YOU IN NEW BRAUNFELS? AND SO ONE OF THE BENEFITS OF THIS WE FEEL IS THIS WHOLE AREA NOW BECOMES IN THE CITY OF SHIRTS, RIGHT? SO ALL OF THE GRAY AND GREEN WE RESPOND TO AS OPPOSED TO THE WAY IT IS, I GUESS UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING. IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM IN THE GREEN, EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE SURROUNDED BY THE CITY, WE WOULDN'T RESPOND FOR PD PROTECTION. AND, AND SO I THINK THE, THE OTHER ISSUE THAT'S COMMONLY IS, WELL, IF THE CITY GEOGRAPHICALLY GROWS, DOES THAT PUT A STRAIN ON OUR SERVICES? AND, AND AGAIN, I THINK AS A PERFECTLY VALID QUESTION, WHAT WE WOULD POINT TO IS WHILE WE'RE ANNEXING A LOT OF AREA, THAT AREA IS NOT EXTENDING OUT A GREAT DISTANCE FROM THE CURRENT CITY. AS YOU CAN SEE BY THE MAP. I MEAN THE BULK OF THE AREA IS LITERALLY SURROUNDED BY THE GRAY. AND THE OTHER IS, I MIGHT NOTE THERE AREN'T A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE TO REALLY NEED SERVICES NOW. SO WE DON'T THINK THE CALL VOLUME'S GONNA GO UP A TON. I I WILL SAY THOUGH ALSO IN OUR MASTER PLANNING, WE, WE DO PLAN TO INCREASE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE AS DEVELOPMENT OCCURS. THAT'S RIGHT. SO THERE WILL BE AN ADDITIONAL FIRE STATION UP THERE AND WITH POLICE, IT'S, IT'S A MATTER OF A POLICE OFFICER, THEIR, THEIR OFFICES, THE CAR, SO THEY'LL BE IN THAT DISTRICT PATROLLING THAT DISTRICT, ET CETERA. SO, UH, [04:20:01] AND WE, BUT DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? NO, IT ANSWERS MY QUESTION, BUT SOMETIMES IT'S, I THINK THE CONCERN I HAVE SOMETIMES IS THAT INFORMATION THAT Y'ALL JUST DELIVERED TO US RIGHT, WOULD BETTER BE SERVED FOR THE PEOPLE WHO WERE CONCERNED EARLIER. RIGHT? I, NOBODY WANTS TO GET INTO AN ARGUMENT, BUT IT'S LIKE THEY HAD THE SAME CONCERN AND I'M ASKING THE SAME QUESTION THEY ASKED AND YOU EXPLAINED IT TO ME PERFECTLY WELL, AND THEY LEFT, THEY LEFT THIS MEETING WITHOUT HAVING THE SAME ANSWERS THAT YOU JUST GAVE US. AND THAT'S BECAUSE OF THE ORDER OF HOW THIS THING HAD TO BE ARRANGED TOO, IS, UH, THE ANNEXATIONS HAVE TO BE OCCURRED FIRST BEFORE WE GO INTO THE ZONING. SO I WOULD, I WOULD SAY THAT FAIR. I THINK THE, OR THE ORDER DOESN'T SORT OF HELP. BUT THE OTHER THING I WOULD SAY, COUNCILMAN IS, YOU KNOW, I THINK STAFF IS CERTAINLY HAPPY TO SIT DOWN WITH RESIDENTS AND HAVE, AND, AND YOU KNOW, PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN THE AREA AND HAVE CONVERSATIONS TO WALK THEM THROUGH HOW THIS STUFF HAPPENS, RIGHT? SO AGAIN, IF WE GET A RESIDENT WHO, WHO CALLS UP TOMORROW OR ONE OF THESE PROPERTIES AND SHE CALLS UP TOMORROW AND SAYS, YOU KNOW, HEY, I'M REALLY FRUSTRATED. WE ASKED THIS QUESTION ABOUT EMERGENCY SERVICES AND WE DIDN'T FEEL LIKE WE GOT AN ANSWER FROM STAFF, OUR REACTION WOULD BE THEN, THEN LET'S HAVE THAT CONVERSATION. YOU WANNA COME ON IN, WE'LL SIT DOWN, WE'LL BRING THE CHIEFS IN. WE'LL WE'LL WALK YOU THROUGH THAT. UM, SO, SO NOT TO SAY AND DIMINISH THEIR CONCERNS, BUT, BUT I THINK AT TIMES WHAT YOU HAVE IS PEOPLE JUST DON'T WANT TO BE ANNEXED AND, AND I APPRECIATE THAT, RIGHT? THEY DON'T WANT THE ADDITIONAL REGULATION, THEY DON'T WANT THE ADDITIONAL TAXES THAT COME WITH IT. THEY DON'T WANT SORT OF THE CITY CONTROL OF THEIR PROPERTY. AND AGAIN, I THINK WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT A LOT. THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THAT WE'VE SEEN IN THE PAST, AND EVEN YOU HEARD IT SOMETIME, NOW I'M, AS LONG AS I'M DOING THIS, I'M GONNA KEEP LIVING HERE. BUT THEN THEY SHOW UP, THEY WANNA SELL TO SOMEONE ELSE, THEY WANNA DEVELOP THAT PROPERTY AND THAT HAS AN IMPACT ON THE CITY, RIGHT? I MEAN THE OTHER, THE OTHER THING IRONICALLY IS, AND I'LL OFFER THIS IN TERMS OF WHO PAYS FOR THOSE SERVICES. SO ANY OF THESE PEOPLE SAY, WELL I PAY, YOU KNOW, COUNTY TAXES THAT GO FOR THESE PROTECTIONS. WELL, YOU ALL PAY THOSE COUNTY TAXES AS WELL. SO YOU PAY FOR YOUR FIRE SERVICE IN THE CITY WITH YOUR TAXES, BUT THEN YOU PAY COUNTY TAXES THAT GO TO PROVIDE FIRE SERVICES THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. BUT OH WAIT, THE COUNTY DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY FIRE SERVICES IN THE CITY. SO YOU'RE SUBSIDIZING THOSE FOLKS WHO ARE IN OUR ETJ FOR THOSE SERVICES, RIGHT? I MEAN, SO THAT'S, THAT'S PART OF THE ANSWER. AND, AND SO WHAT I'LL SAY IS HAPPY TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION IN TERMS OF LEVEL OF SERVICE AND HOW QUICK IT IS AND, AND YOU HEARD, YOU KNOW, RESIDENTS SAY, AND, AND MAYBE PERSON HERE, YOU KNOW, IN TERMS OF CIVIL FIRE AND OUR FIRE, WELL WHAT BUILDING FIRE STATION FOUR THAT IS SORT OF UP IN THIS AREA THAT WILL HELP TAKE SOME OF THE CALL VOLUME OFF TO, TO LET STATION THREE PROVIDE MORE AND STATION ONE PROVIDE MORE AND, AND THAT WILL PROVIDE FOR THAT AREA AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS AND SHIRTS ARE PAYING FOR THAT, RIGHT? THE PEOPLE WHO SHOP AND BUY. AND SO I WE'RE HAPPY TO HAVE THAT CONVERSATION AND PEOPLE REALLY WANT TO COME IN AND SIT DOWN AND HAVE THAT CONVERSATION, PULL THE CHIEFS IN. WE ALWAYS ARE, BUT THE OTHER THING I TELL YOU IS I'M NOT SURE WHAT BASIS AND WHAT FACTS THEY HAVE TO SAY, THIS IS WHY I BELIEVE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ISN'T GOING TO BE AS GOOD. I MEAN WE HEARD PEOPLE LAMENT, WELL THE CITY'S NOT PROVIDING THESE SERVICES NOW. WELL SURE WE'RE NOT PROVIDING THESE SERVICES NOW YOU'RE NOT IN THE CITY, YOU'RE NOT IN THE CITY. WHY WOULD I PROVIDE POLICE PROTECTION TO YOU FOR SOMETHING YOU'RE NOT ENTITLED TO, YOU'RE NOT PAYING FOR? AND SO I I, I THINK AGAIN A VERY GOOD QUESTION IN TERMS OF CAN WE REALLY PROVIDE A LEVEL OF SERVICE? AND I THINK AS STEVE SAID, AS THESE AREAS DEVELOP, WE NOW WILL BENEFIT FROM THE REVENUE FROM THAT AND CAN PROVIDE A GREATER LEVEL OF SERVICE AS THERE'S GREATER DEMAND. BUT YES, STAFF AND THE CHIEFS DON'T HAVE A CONCERN WITH THAT. NOW, AND I WILL SAY LASTLY, AND THEN I'LL QUIT MY RAMBLE. WHEN WE DID THE COMP PLAN, THERE WERE DISCUSSIONS ABOUT TO WHAT DEGREE DO WE WANT TO KEEP SOME OF THESE AREAS IN OUR ETJ BECAUSE OF THAT POTENTIAL COST TO PROVIDE SERVICE DOWN THE ROAD VERSUS THE VALUE THEY HAD IN ARE WE BEST POSITIONED TO, SO WITH THE COMP PLAN UPDATE, THERE ARE A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THAT. SOME OF THESE AREAS, WHETHER OR NOT WE REALLY WANT 'EM IN OUR ECJ OR TO ANNEX, SORRY I WENT ON A LONG-WINDED. BUT FOR CLARITY, BECAUSE THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO GO WITH THE AD ZONING ON ALL THE PROPERTIES, WE REALLY WANT THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO CONTINUE TO DO WHAT THEY'RE DOING NOW AND AT THE SAME TIME PROTECT THE CITY BECAUSE THEY CAN'T DO ANYTHING ELSE UNLESS THEY COME IN FOR A REZONING APPLICATION ANYWAY. SO THE ONLY CAVEAT I HAVE IS [04:25:01] THEY ALL GOT UP TO A T AND SAID WE WANT TO KEEP DOING WHAT WE'RE DOING NOW. SO AGAIN, SAME KIND OF POINT. IT'S NOT THE CITY SAYING WHAT YOU SHOULD, THEY ALL GOT UP AND SAY WE'RE GONNA KEEP DOING WHAT WE'RE DOING. AND A FEW OF 'EM WENT OUT OF A CAVEAT UNTIL I DECIDE TO CHANGE MY MIND. RIGHT? BUT THAT'S RIGHT. WE'RE WILLING TO ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE DOING WHAT WE'RE DOING. WE PASSED AN ORDINANCE TO MAKE THAT EASIER FOR THEM TO DO THAT. AND THAT'S CERTAINLY FINE. BUT YOU HEARD SOME OF THOSE SNIPPETS OF, BUT AT SOME POINT, AND THIS ACTION IS WHEN THAT TIME COMES, THAT'S GOING TO IMPACT THE CITY. AND WE SHOULD HAVE SOME SAY IN WHAT YOU THEN DO WITH YOUR PROPERTY BECAUSE IT AFFECTS YOUR NEIGHBORS, IT AFFECTS THE PEOPLE AROUND YOU AND IT AFFECTS THE LARGER CITY JUST LIKE FRANKLY WE DO WITH EVERYONE ELSE WHO LIVES IN THE CITY WHO, WHO HAS TO FOLLOW THE SAME RULES AND REGULATIONS. AND IT'S ALSO ALIGNED WITH THE VISION THAT WE HAVE FOR THAT AREA THAT THAT'S RIGHT. AND I'D SAY THIS, THAT, THAT, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE SAY WE HAVE THAT VISION THAT WE AS A BROADER SENSE OF OUR COMMUNITY. AND SO THE REALITY OF THIS IS, AND I LITERALLY HAD THIS CONVERSATION WITH ONE OF THEM, WHEN YOU'RE ANNEXED, YOU'RE A CITIZEN LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE, YOU CAN WEIGH IN. ALTHOUGH OUR COUNCIL NEVER SAID, WELL YOU DON'T LIVE IN THE CITY SO YOU CAN'T GET UP HERE AND SPEAK AND OFFER YOUR OPINION. YOU'VE ALWAYS HEARD THIS FOLKS OUT. BUT THEY CAN TURN AROUND AND THEY CAN CHOOSE TO RUN FOR CITY COUNCIL. THEY CAN SIT ON A BORDER COMMISSION, THEY CAN HELP SHAPE WHERE THE CITY GOES AND SHAPE WHAT THEY WANT THIS COMMUNITY BE. SO THEY HAVE THAT RIGHT JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE DOES TO MAKE THIS COMMUNITY WHAT THEY WANT TO BE AND CREATE THE PLAN THAT WE WANT TO DEVELOP CONSISTENT WITH. YEAH. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU COUNCIL. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? MOTION HAS BEEN MADE TO, TO UM, 24 S 22, ALL A D ZONING. AND THAT WAS THE MOTION. THAT WAS THE SECOND. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? GO AHEAD AND CAST YOUR VOTE. WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN AYES, NO OBJECTIONS. MOTION PASSES. ALRIGHT, WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 120. MAKE ME READ ALL THESE NUMBERS. ORDINANCE NUMBER 24 S 24, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 2030 ACRES OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R TWO KNOWN AS BEAR COUNTY COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 3 1 0 0 6 4 1 1, 4, 1, 7, 3, 0, 3, 3, 9, 7, 7, 2, 3, 3, 9, 7, 7, 3, 3, 3, 9, 7, 4, 4, 1, 0 5, 0 2, 0 3, 3, 4, 0 0 3, 0, 3, 3. 9, 3, 4, 8, 3, 3, 9, 3, 4, 1, 3, 3. 9, 7, 7, 8, 3, 1, 0 0 1, 2, 3, 9 0 8 4 2 3 3. 9 2 9 3, 3 3. 9 2 7 5, 3 3 9 3 28. 1 0 1. 3 7 9 8 3 0 1 2 2 2 3 0 3 1 0 0 2 6. DID I READ WRONG ON THE OTHER ONE? OKAY, 1 2 7 4 9 2 0 3 3 9 2 8 6 3 1, 0 0 1 9 1 1, 3, 9 5, 3 0 1 0 5. SIX. 9 6, 7. THREE THREE. 9, 3, 3. 1, 1, 1. SEVEN. EIGHT FOUR. 8 0 3 0 9 4 2 7 3 0 9 4 2 5. THREE ONE. 0 0 0. SIX THREE. 1 0 1. TWO FIVE. 1 0 5. SIX. 9 6 6. THREE ONE. ZERO. ZERO ZERO. TWO THREE. ONE. ZERO ZERO. FOUR. EIGHT. ONE, THREE. ONE ONE. FIVE. SIX. FIVE. THREE. ONE. ZERO ZERO. 2 2 3. ONE, TWO. ZERO. ONE. FIVE. THREE. ONE. TWO. ZERO. ONE. SEVEN. THREE. 1, 0 1. TWO. SIX. THREE THREE. NINE TWO. NINE ZERO. THREE THREE. NINE TWO. EIGHT. EIGHT. THREE THREE. NINE. SEVEN. NINE ZERO. THREE THREE. NINE. THREE. THREE. FOUR. THREE. THREE. NINE. THREE. TWO. NINE. ONE ONE. FOUR. ZERO. FOUR. EIGHT. ONE. THREE. ONE. 0 0 0. SEVEN THREE. ONE. TWO. ZERO ZERO. EIGHT. THREE. ZERO. NINE. FOUR. 29. ONE ONE. NINE ZERO. ONE. THREE. TWO THREE. ONE. ZERO ZERO. THREE. TWO THREE. ONE. ZERO. ZERO. NINE ZERO. THREE. ONE. ZERO. ONE ZERO. SEVEN. ONE ONE. OH THREE. 0 9 1 1 2 [04:30:04] , EXCUSE ME. 1 2 0 7 5. 6 0 1 1. ZERO. THREE ZERO. 9 2 1. ONE. ZERO. THREE ZERO. NINE THREE. THREE THREE. 9 3 25. THREE THREE. NINE TWO. SEVEN SIX. ONE ONE. SEVEN. EIGHT. FOUR. SEVEN. NINE. THREE. ONE. ZERO. ONE. ONE. ONE. THREE. ONE. ZERO ZERO. THREE. NINE THREE. THREE. NINE TWO. EIGHT. FOUR. THREE ONE. ZERO. ZERO ZERO. FOUR THREE. 9 3 0 9. 4 21. 3 0 9. 4 37 EXCUSE ME. 3 0 9 8 37 3 4 0 0 5. 9 3 3. 9 2 9 5. THREE ZERO. 9 4 1. EIGHT. THREE THREE. 9 2 8 5. THREE ONE. 0 0 5. 9 3 1. ZERO. 2 2 5. THREE ONE. 0 0 4 0. A PORTION OF 3 3 9 2 7 4. AND TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 10 ACRES, 10.1 ACRES TO NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DISTRICT KNOWN AS A PORTION OF BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 2 7 4. AND APPROXIMATELY 152.4 ACRES TO GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT GB KNOWN AS BE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 3 3 9 3 5 9 3 3 9. 3 6 2 AND 3 3 9 3 5 3. BEAR COUNTY, TEXAS FIRST BREATHING MS. DELGADO. OKAY. YOU PROBABLY SAW ME OVER HERE LIKE HAVING A PANIC ATTACK SO I APOLOGIZE. I THOUGHT ALL OF THE SLIDES WERE WRONG. LOOKS LIKE JUST MY TITLE SLIDE IS WRONG. I THINK THE REST OF IT'S GONNA BE FINE. GIMME JUST A SECOND JUST TO MAKE SURE THOSE ARE ALL THE RIGHT ONES. SO APOLOGIZE. SO THIS IS FOR 24 S 24. IT WILL BE FOR 2,200 ACRE ZONING TO AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AD AND TO GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT AND LA DELGADO PLANNING MANAGER. I'M GONNA APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE. A LOT OF THIS IS GONNA BE VERY REPETITIVE FROM THE COMA AND GUADALUPE ONE. BEAR WITH ME. SO 20 10, 20 11, RIGHT. THE CITY ENTERED INTO DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS FOR A TERM OF 10 YEARS. IN 2020 AND 2021, WE OFFERED DELAYED ANNEXATION EXTENSIONS. THOSE EXTENSIONS, UM, HAD A PROHIBITION ON AN ANNEXATION AND THAT WOULD BE IN EFFECT UNTIL JANUARY 1ST, 2024, AT WHICH TIME THE CITY ASSERTS WOULD BEGIN ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS AND CONCLUDE THEM NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 31ST. THAT FIRST DATE JANUARY 1ST IS PASSED. UH, THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN WAS ADOPTED IN 24 S OH SIX AND AT THE APRIL 16TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING RESOLUTION 24 R 42 WAS APPROVED. ORDINANCE 24 S 24 IS THE NEXT STEP IN THAT ANNEXATION PROCESS. SPECIFICALLY IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING ZONING FOR THE APPROXIMATELY 2,200 ACRES WITHIN BEXAR COUNTY. ON APRIL 25TH, 202 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES WERE MAILED TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN A 200 FOOT BOUNDARY. ADDITIONALLY, THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE, UM, NOTIFIED PER TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE TWO 11.006. ADDITIONALLY, S-C-U-C-I-S-D WAS ALSO NOTIFIED. WE'VE RECEIVED TWO RESPONSES IN FAVOR, ZERO RESPONSES NEUTRAL AND 25 RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION. AND A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN THE SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS ON MAY 15TH. ADDITIONALLY, 54 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE SIGNS WERE PLACED ON APRIL 26TH. SO IF A PROPOSED ZONE CHANGES PROTESTED IN WRITING AND SIGNED BY THE OWNERS OF AT LEAST 20% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, OR IF AT LEAST 20% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND IMMEDIATELY ADJOINING THE AREA COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND EXTENDING 200 FEET FROM THAT AREA, THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE MUST RECEIVE IN ORDER TO TAKE EFFECT THE AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF AT LEAST THREE FOURTHS OF ALL MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AT THE TIME OF THE REPORT. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF THE PROTESTED PARCEL ACREAGE IS 27.54% OF THE AREA OF THE LOSS OR LAND COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE AND A TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF 2.29% OF THE AREA OF THE LOSS OR LAND IMMEDIATELY ADJOINING THE AREA COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING OR ZONING CHANGE AMENDMENT AND EXTENDING 200 FEET BASED ON THE 27.54% OF THE AREA OF THE LOTS OR LAND COVERED BY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE. THE THREE FOURTH BOAT HAS BEEN TRIGGERED FOR THIS ITEM AS WELL. VERY SIMILAR TO THE LAST ITEM. WHEN WE PROPOSED THE ZONING FOR THESE PROPERTIES TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON MAY 8TH, WE PRESENTED, UH, APPROXIMATELY 2030 ACRES A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. R TWO A HUNDRED FIFTY TWO 0.4 IS GENERAL BUSINESS AND 10.1 AS THAT NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, WHICH IS WHAT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE AGENDA ITEM LANGUAGE AND THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EXTENSIVE PUBLIC HEARING THAT OCCURRED AT THE MAY 8TH MEETING, STAFF IS NOW RECOMMENDING ALL PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9 TO BE ZONED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9 [04:35:02] IS PROPOSED TO BE ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS. THIS RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF IS CONSISTENT WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PROVIDED ON MAY 8TH AND MAY 15TH. AND JUST AS A NOTE, THE BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9, THE PROPERTY OWNER SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED IN WRITING THAT WE PROPOSE GENERAL BUSINESS FOR THAT PROPERTY. SO HERE ARE THE PROPERTIES, THE MAPS PRETTY LARGE FOR THE BEXAR COUNTY SECTION, SO HAVE IT BROKEN DOWN HERE. THAT GREEN COLOR AGAIN IS THE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT IN THE GREEN. THEN THE BLUE IS THAT 3 3 9 3 5 9, WHICH IS PROPOSED AS THE GENERAL BUSINESS. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL AGAIN, NUMBER ONE, WHETHER THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE OR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT IMPLEMENTS THE POLICIES OF THE ADOPTED COMP PLAN, INCLUDING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP ORDINANCE 24 S 24 PROPOSES TO ZONE ALL PROPERTIES EXCEPT 3 3 9 3 5 9 AS AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT BASED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. EXISTING LAND USES THE PROPERTY'S LOCATION AND THE DESIGNATION ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP AS ADOPTED BY 24 S OH SIX. I CAN READ ALL OF THESE, BUT THROUGH THERE ARE IDENTIFIED AS COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOOD ON THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE MAP. COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS ARE GENERALLY AREAS CHARACTERIZED BY A MIXTURE OF HOUSING OPTIONS WITH SUPPORTING LAND USES. AND THEN PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS 3 1 0 1 2 5 3 3 9 2 7 4 AND A PORTION OF 3 1 0 1 2 6 AND A PORTION OF 3 1 0 0 9 0 ARE IDENTIFIED AS LOCAL CORRIDOR, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT AREAS. TYPICALLY SITUATED ALONG MEDIUM TO HIGH VOLUME COLLECTOR ROADS WITH NEIGHBORHOODS AT THE PERIMETER. AND THEN THE PROPERTY IDENTIFI IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IDENTIFIED. THERE ARE REGIONAL CORRIDOR, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT AREAS. BEAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION 3 1 0 0 6 4 IS IDENTIFIED AS MIXED USE CENTER, WHICH IS DEFINED AS COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT AREAS WITH A MIX OF USES. AND THEN SPECIFICALLY BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 3 9 3 5 9 IS IDENTIFIED IN THE COMP PLAN AS REGIONAL CORRIDOR, WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS COMMERCIAL AND ENTERTAINMENT AREAS ALONG MAJOR THOROUGH AFFAIRS THAT SERVE POPULATIONS WITHIN THE CITY AND THE BROADER REGION. BASED ON THE IDENTIFIED PARCELS PROP PROXIMITY TO I 10 AND THE REGIONAL CORRIDOR LAND USE DESIGNATION, THE PROPOSED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IS APPROPRIATE, ALTHOUGH THE SUBJECT PARCELS HAVE DIFFERING COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS. THE PROPOSED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP WITHIN THE COMP PLAN IS A GUIDING DOCUMENT FOR DETERMINING APPROPRIATE LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT TYPES FOR THE FUTURE VISION OF SHIRTS. HOWEVER, THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND EXISTING LAND USES NEED TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN REVIEWING ZONING APPLICATIONS. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS NOT BASED ON A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, BUT STRICTLY DUE TO EXPIRING DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS. IF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES WERE PROPOSED TO BE DEVELOPED IN THE FUTURE, THE ZONING DESIGNATION WILL ALSO NEED TO BE REVIEWED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE COMP PLAN AND FUTURE LAND USE. MAP THE MAP AND YOU CAN SEE THAT ONE PROPERTY, KIND OF THE OUTLIER PROPOSES GB THAT REGIONAL CORRIDOR THERE. NUMBER TWO, WHETHER THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT PROMOTES THE HEALTH, SAFETY OR GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY AND THE SAFE, ORDERLY, EFFICIENT, AND HEALTHFUL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. AS PART OF PROMOTING HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE, THE CITY SHOULD ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT COMPATIBLE WITH SURROUNDING USES, UTILIZING STANDARDS AND TRANSITIONAL USES TO ALLEVIATE NEGATIVE IMPACTS. AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AD IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AS A BASE ZONING DISTRICT FOR AGRICULTURAL AND RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. RESIDENCES IN THIS DISTRICT ARE INTENDED TO BE ON A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF FIVE ACRES. CLUSTERING OF UP TO TWO HOMES MAY BE ALLOWED ON THE SAME LOT. SUBJECT TO SETBACK REQUIREMENTS. THIS DISTRICT IS SUITABLE FOR AREAS WHERE DEVELOPMENT IS PREMATURE DUE TO LACK OF UTILITIES CAPACITY OR SERVICE. AND FOR AREAS THAT ARE UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS OR POTENTIAL HEALTH OR SAFETY HAZARDS, THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT DESIGNATIONS ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES AND EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. THE MAJORITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS OR ARE UNDEVELOPED. THE PROPOSED AD WOULD ALLOW FOR THE RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS LAND USES TO REMAIN IN THE CONFORMING STATUS. THE PROPOSED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT GB FOR BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9 IS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND PROXIMITY TO I 10. NUMBER THREE, WHETHER THE USE IS PERMITTED BY THE PROPOSED CHANGE IN ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION AND THE STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO SUCH USES WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA OF THE LAND TO BE RECLASSIFIED. THE SUBJECT PARCELS ARE CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED UTILIZED FOR AG OPERATIONS OR UTILIZED FOR RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION OF AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT IS APPROPRIATE IN THE MEDIA AREA OF THE LAND TO BE ANNEXED AND ZONED. SINCE THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS ARE BASED ON CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND WITH THE EXISTING LAND USES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES, THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTIES LAND USES WILL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS. NUMBER FOUR, WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS IN ACCORD WITH ANY [04:40:01] EXISTING OR PROPOSED PLANS FOR PROVIDING PUBLIC SCHOOL STREETS, WATER SUPPLY, SANITARY SEWER, OR OTHER PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES TO THE AREA, A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS MAILED TO S-E-U-C-I-S-D TO NOTIFY THEM OF THE PROPOSED ZONING. THE CITY OF CHARLOTTES POLICE FIRE AND EMS DEPARTMENTS HAVE INDICATED THEY DO NOT HAVE ANY CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROPOSED REZONING REQUEST OR THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICES WITH THE ANNEXATION AND PROPOSED ZONING OF THE PROPERTY. AS THE CITY IS BETTER ABLE TO GUIDE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE CONFORMANCE WITH THE MASTER THIRD OR PLAN MASTER WATER PLAN AND MASTER SEWER PLAN FOR THE CITY. ADDITIONALLY, THE ANNEXATION ASSOCIATED ZONING WOULD ENSURE THAT ANY FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS WILL MEET CITY STANDARDS TO ENSURE COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE CITY, WHICH WILL ULTIMATELY WILL ENSURE THE SAFE, ORDERLY AND EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. ALTHOUGH NO DEVELOPMENT PLANS ARE CURRENTLY PROPOSED FOR THE PROPERTIES BEING ZONED AS THIS IS A CITY INITIATED ZONING, IF DEVELOPMENT WAS TO OCCUR, WATER, SEWER AND ROADWAYS WOULD BE EVALUATED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. NUMBER FIVE, WHETHER THERE HAVE BEEN ENVIRONMENTAL OR ECONOMICAL CHANGES WHICH WARRANT THE REQUESTED CHANGE, NO. THERE HAVE BEEN NO ENVIRONMENTAL OR ECONOMICAL CHANGES THAT WARRANTED THE REQUESTED CHANGE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE CURRENTLY WITHIN THE ETJ AND UNDER DELAYED ANNEXATION AGREEMENTS. ZONING DESIGNATION HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN ESTABLISHED. HOWEVER, BASED ON THE EXPIRATION OF THE DELAYED ANNEXATION EXTENSIONS, THE PROPERTIES ARE SUBJECT TO ANNEXATION AND THIS PART OF THAT ARE SUBJECT TO ZONING. NUMBER SIX, WHETHER THERE IS AN ERROR IN THE ORIGINAL ZONING OF THE PROPERTY FOR WHICH THE CHANGES REQUESTED, THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES HAVE NO EXISTING ZONING AS PART AS THEY ARE PART OF THE ETJ. NUMBER SEVEN, WHETHER ALL THE APPLICANT'S BACK TAXES OWED TO THE CITY HAVE BEEN PAID IN FULL SUBJECT PROPERTIES ARE CURRENTLY NOT WITHIN THE CITY OF SHIRTZ. NO BACK TAXES ARE OWED TO THE CITY. NUMBER EIGHT, WHETHER OTHER CRITERIA ARE MET, WHICH AT THE DISCRETION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL ARE DEEMED RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT IN THE CONSIDERATION OF THE AMENDMENT. STAFF HAS ENSURE ALL UDC REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET FOR THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE. AND THIS TIME HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OR THE CITY COUNCIL DUE TO THE PROPERTIES HAVING DELAYED ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AND EXTENSIONS THAT ARE EXPIRING AND ARE SUBJECT TO VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION IS APPROPRIATE TO ZONE THESE PROPERTIES AT THIS TIME. PER THE AGREEMENTS UPON ANNEXATION, THE PROPERTY SHALL BE ZONED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES AND PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLAN AND UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. THE PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS ARE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE RECENTLY ADOPTED COMP PLAN AND IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING LAND USES THAT ARE ACTIVELY OCCURRING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 S 24 AT THE MAY 8TH, 24, 20 24 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD. THERE WAS EXTENSIVE COMMENTARY AND DISCUSSION ON THE EXISTING LAND USES OCCURRING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES. THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER'S DESIRES FURTHER LAND AND HOW THE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS WOULD'VE MADE THEIR PROPERTIES NON-CONFORMING IF THE ZONING WAS APPROVED. BASED ON THE COMMENTS PROVIDED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE DISCUSSION BETWEEN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS AND CITY STAFF, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ULTIMATELY VOTED TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AD FOR ALL PROPERTIES IDENTIFIED IN THE ZONING CASE. EXCEPT FOR BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9. THE VOTE WAS FIVE ONE WITH CHAIRMAN OUTLAWS THE NAY. AND THEN AT THE MAY 15TH, 24, 20 24 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING, A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD FOR THE ZONING OF BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY ID 3 3 9 3 5 9. AFTER THE PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION, THE PLANNING AND ZONING AND COMMISSION VOTED TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PROPOSED GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WITH A UNANIMOUS VOTE. THANK YOU MS. DELGADO. ALRIGHT, THIS, UH, IS ON THE AGENDAS AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE IN ATTENDANCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO, UH, ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL IN REFERENCE TO THIS SUBJECT? UM, MY NAME'S TRACY CAMPOS. I LIVE AT 1 2 3 4 0 SCHAFER ROAD AND I'M GOING TO READ YOU A LETTER FROM MY COUSIN JANICE LUDWICK, WHO COULD NOT BE HERE TONIGHT. HER PROPERTY IS ON RAF BURNETT PROPERTY ID 1 2 7 4 9 2 0 AND SHE ASKED ME TO READ IT BECAUSE SHE'S OUT OF TOWN. SHE IS OPPOSED TO THE REZONING OF HER PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREAS TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THIS WAS BEFORE IT WAS ALL MADE BACK TO AD HER PROPERTY'S BEEN IN THE FAMILY FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS. OUR PROPERTY'S BEEN IN THE FAMILY FOR OVER 400 YEARS. SHE IS MY COUSIN. UM, SHE'S ON THE RF BRENT AND WE'RE ON THE SCHAEFER ROADSIDE. UH, I DON'T FEEL THAT I SHOULD HAVE TO BE BURDENED WITH THE REZONING OF AN AREA TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THE PROBLEMS THAT WILL ACCOMPANY THIS CHANGE IN ZONING. MY PROPERTY IS ONE OF THE FEW LARGE ACREAGE PROPERTIES LEFT IN THE AREA AND I AM SURE THAT I SPEAK FOR MANY OTHER FAMILIES IN THE AREA THAT DID NOT WANT TO SEE THE BEAUTIFUL COUNTRYSIDE, EXCUSE ME, TURNED INTO A SEA OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES LIKE THE 636 RESIDENTIAL LOTS BEING CREATED IN THE SADDLEBROOK RANCH DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS NEXT TO HER PROPERTY. MY FAMILY AND I WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE OUR FAMILY TRADITION OF FARMING THE LAND FOR GENERATIONS TO COME. I ALSO AM EXTREMELY OPPOSED TO THE MAJOR PRINCIPLE ARTERIAL ROADWAY, WHICH IS PLANNED NEXT TO HER PROPERTY. THIS ROADWAY WOULD GREATLY INTERFERE WITH MY FARMING OPERATION AND REMOVE SIGNIFICANT ACRE FROM MY PROPERTY, RESULTING IN A REDUCTION OF FARM INCOME WHILE COMPLETELY CHANGING THE LANDSCAPE OF THE AREA. MY FAMILY ASKS THAT THE CITY DISTRICTS CONSIDER THE REASONING OF THIS AREA AND ALLOW THE WONDERFUL FARMING COMMUNITY TO REMAIN AS THE AD DISTRICT. THANK YOU. [04:45:04] ALRIGHT, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALRIGHT COUNSEL, UH, WELL BEFORE I OPEN IT FOR DISCUSSION, IF YOU CAN BRING UP WHAT CONFUSED ME A LITTLE IS THE, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 24 S 24 AS WRITTEN OR AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION. SO IT REALLY DIDN'T SAY ON THIS ONE. SO RECOMMENDS APPROVAL AS PRESENTED TONIGHT, UM, AS ALL OF THE PROPERTIES AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT EXCEPT FOR 3 3 9 3 5 9 TO BE GENERAL BUSINESS, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED AS WELL. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFICATION. ALRIGHT, COUNCIL FLOORS OPEN. UH, MAYOR PRO TEM MACALUSO, UH, THE ONLY ONE I'M A LITTLE BIT CONFUSED ON ARE THE TWO PARCELS THERE RIGHT OFF OF I 10. WHY WERE THOSE REMOVED FROM, UM, THE, UH, GENERAL BUSINESS SINCE THEY'RE IN THAT CORRIDOR CONCEPT THAT WE HAVE? SO ULTIMATELY WE, UM, WE ARE RECOMMENDING WHAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED, WHICH WAS THE PROPERTY OWNERS WHEN THEY CAME OUT AND SPOKE AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, WAS WE WANNA KEEP AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT. SO AD IS WHAT THE P AND Z RECOMMENDED. THE ONLY REASON THAT THIS ONE IS BEING PROPOSED AS GENERAL BUSINESS IS BECAUSE THE PROPERTY OWNER SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED IN WRITING THAT THEY NOT BE ZONED AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT, BUT INSTEAD BE ZONED GENERAL BUSINESS. IT WASN'T NECESSARILY THE PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THOSE TWO PARCELS THAT REQUESTED THAT IT WAS JUST, UH, UH, WE JUST DECIDED TO DO ALL OF THEM BECAUSE THAT WAS A MAJORITY FLAVOR THAT WAS EXPERIENCED AT THE MEETING. CORRECT. WELL, IF, UH, NOW ON A DEVELOPMENT SIDE, IF A DEVELOPER SEES THOSE PARCELS AS A AS AS, UM, CURRENT ZONING, IS THAT GONNA MAKE THE PROPERTY LESS ATTRACTIVE TO THEM? IS IT GONNA SEEM LIKE IT'S A MORE DIFFICULT, UM, IDEA FOR THEM TO USE THAT OR TO GO FOR THAT, THOSE PARCELS OF LAND? I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT ALL OF 'EM. I'M JUST TALKING ABOUT THE ONES THAT ARE BORDERING I 10. SO I DON'T NECESSARILY WANNA SAY THAT THEY'RE LESS ATTRACTIVE, BUT IF THEY WANNA COME IN, THEY WOULD NEED TO REQUEST A REZONE. JUST LIKE A LOT OF DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF SHIRTS. I, I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING IS IF IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON THOSE TWO PARCELS DIDN'T WANT TO KEEP IT AS AGRICULTURAL, MAYBE THEY WANTED A GENERAL BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY'RE LOOKING AT TRYING TO SELL IT. SO I CAN'T SPEAK DIRECTLY FOR THIS ONE, BUT I KNOW I'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS AND THERE WAS, UM, MULTIPLE WRITTEN OPPOSITIONS RECEIVED BY THIS PROPERTY OWNER THAT WANTED TO STAY AND WANTS TO MOVE BACK TO THIS PROPERTY AND USE IT FOR RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL. WHICH ONE? THIS ONE, SORRY. 3, 3 9 3 6 2. THIS ONE HERE THAT THEY, THEY WANT IT TO BE AGRICULTURAL. I CANNOT DIRECTLY SPEAK TO WHAT THE PROPERTY OWNERS DESIRES FOR THAT ONE. CLEAR EMILY, AFTER THE P AND Z RECOMMENDATION TO GO AG ON ALL OF 'EM, WE DIDN'T HEAR FROM ANY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS GOING, WELL, THAT'S NOT I WANTED. RIGHT? 'CAUSE 'CAUSE THAT WOULD BE THE THOUGHT IS THEY SAID, OH, YOU'RE DOING GB OR R TWO, I'M FINE WITH THAT. NO NEED TO SHOW UP. BUT AFTER P AND Z TOOK ITS ACTION, IT'S NOT AS THOUGH WE HEARD FROM ANYBODY TO SAY, OH, I DON'T WANT THAT. SO I THINK OUR ANSWER IS IF THE PROPERTY OWNER HAD A CONCERN, THEY WOULD'VE SENT US SOMETHING THEY WOULD'VE SHOWN UP, WHICH SOME TOOK THE TIME TO DO WELL JUST BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THE ORIGINAL NOTICE HAD THOSE THREE PARCELS AS GENERAL BUSINESS. SO WHAT IF THEY SAW THAT, BUT THEY DIDN'T SEE THAT THERE WAS A CHANGE IN THAT RECOMMENDATION? SO I, I WOULD BE VERY SURPRISED THAT ANY PROPERTY OWNER WHO HAD AN INTEREST WOULDN'T LOOK AND READ THE STAFF BOARD AND FIND OUT WHAT'S GOING ON. AGAIN, I THINK, I THINK TO YOUR POINT IS IF THEY REALLY HAD A CONCERN AND WANTED TO MAKE SURE THIS HAPPENED, THEY WOULD'VE TRACKED IT AND THEY WOULD'VE FOUND THAT OUT. I, I THINK THE ANSWER IS YEAH, AT THIS POINT, IF THEY WANT TO COME IN AND REQUEST A REZONE, THEY CAN REQUEST A REZONE AND WE WILL EVALUATE IT AS IT GOES FORWARD. AGAIN, I DON'T THINK WE'RE NAIVE ENOUGH TO THINK THIS WILL ALL BE AG FOREVER. AS MANY OF THE PEOPLE GOT UP AND SPOKE BEFORE, THEY SAID, I WANT TO KEEP FARMING, I'M GONNA KEEP FARMING IT. AND THEN THEY'D ADD THAT LITTLE CAVEAT UNTIL I DON'T WANT TO KEEP DOING THAT ANYMORE AND THEN I WANT TO DO WHAT I WANT TO DO WITH IT. SO I I CERTAINLY APPRECIATE YOUR POINT. I THINK FROM A STAFF PERSPECTIVE, THERE WAS GREATER DEFERENCE TO WHAT WE HEARD, WHERE WE HEARD FROM SOMEONE SAYING, I DON'T WANT AG, I WANT SOMETHING ELSE. WE, WE FOLLOWED THAT. THAT WAS IT. I JUST WAS CONFUSED ON THOSE TWO PROPERTIES BEING THAT I KNOW WHAT OUR, WHAT WE'VE SET OUT IN THE MASTER PLAN. YOU KNOW, I CAN SEE, I UNDERSTAND THE, THE AG ON ALL THE OTHERS AND A LOT OF THE PEOPLE ARE, ARE CURRENTLY LIVING, YOU KNOW, ON THOSE PROPERTIES. WHETHER THEY'RE LIVING ON THOSE, I DON'T KNOW. I JUST WAS CURIOUS. YEAH, I'M, I'M A LITTLE SURPRISED TOO. AGAIN, I I [04:50:01] WOULD SAY IS WHAT I'VE TYPICALLY SEEN IS IF IT WAS AN INVESTOR GROUP OR DEVELOPER GROUP, THEY TRACK THIS STUFF ALL THE WAY THROUGH. THEY HAVE PEOPLE, THEY PAY TO TRACK THIS STUFF ALL THE WAY THROUGH. THEY MAKE VERY CLEAR WHAT THEIR OPINION IS. THEY WOULD OFTEN COME IN AND HAVE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT, WELL, GB GB TWO THINGS LIKE THAT, OTHER THAN THE ONE THAT WE GOT, WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN THAT, BUT THIS COUNCIL COULD GO AHEAD AND REMOVE THESE TWO OTHER PROPERTIES. 'CAUSE I AGREE WITH, UH, MAYOR PROTON MACALUSO, THESE, THESE ARE RIGHT ON IH 30, UH, IH 10, SO THIS COUNCIL CAN ACTUALLY PULL THESE THREE PROPERTIES AND PUT THEM AS GB. YOU, YOU COULD, AGAIN, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THOUGH THE PNZ RECOMMENDATION WAS TO GO AG EXCEPT THAT ONE, EXCEPT THIS ONE. THAT'S CERTAINLY AN OPTION THAT COURT TALKS ABOUT THAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION NOW IS TO GO THAT. SO AGAIN, ANYONE WHO CARED AGAIN REQUIRES A LITTLE BIT OF EFFORT, BUT THEY HAD PULLED UP THE STAFF REPORT, LOOKED AT IT, WOULD'VE SEEN WHAT THE RECOMMENDATION WAS. THEY HAD TIME TO CALL AND SAY, I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THAT. AND SO IF, WHAT I WOULD SAY IS, IF IT'S WE'RE KIND OF HELPING FOLKS, I, I WOULDN'T NECESSARILY ASSUME THAT THE OTHER, WHAT I WOULD SAY, AND I THINK THIS IS THE LARGER STACK FOR PER PERSPECTIVE, IS THE AD DISTRICT IS VERY LIMITED IN TERMS OF WHAT MM-HMM. CAN HAPPEN. RIGHT? SO AGAIN, IT COULD BE THAT THOSE PEOPLE ARE LIKE, YEAH, LET 'EM GO AD 'CAUSE I DON'T WANT THE WHOLE THING GB I WANT TO DO SOME MULTI-FAMILY ON IT. RIGHT. AND SO THEY WANT TO COME IN AND, AND ASK FOR SOMETHING SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT. I, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT IS, BUT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE IS, YOU KNOW, IF, IF YOU DON'T THINK THE A D IS APPROPRIATE, CERTAINLY VOTE SOMETHING ELSE. BUT, BUT I THINK WE WOULD SHOW DEFERENCE TO THE PEOPLE WHO CAME AND SPOKE AND WE HAVEN'T HEARD ANYBODY HAVE A PROBLEM WITH ANY OF THIS. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS? UH, YEAH, MAYOR, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 24 S 24 WITH ALL PROPERTIES SEW AS AD WITH THE EXCEPTION OF BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY NUMBER 3 3 9 3 5 9 TO BE DESIGNATED AS GENERAL BUSINESS. THANK YOU. MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS AND SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. COUNSEL. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? WE DO NEED THE SIX ONE VOTE FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND. RIGHT. OKAY. COUNSEL, PLEASE, UH, CAST YOUR VOTE. RIGHT? WE CAN PUBLISH THE VOTE PLEASE. WE HAVE SEVEN YAYS. NO OBJECTION. MOTION PASSES. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL [Information available in City Council Packets] MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 121. MAJOR PROG MAJOR PROJECTS IN PROGRESS AND CIP. THESE ARE INFORMATION PACKETS THAT WERE PROVIDED COUNSEL AND AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC VIEWING@OURHOMEPAGESHIRTS.COM. SO WE'LL MOVE ON. UM, [Requests and Announcements] ANY POSSIBLE UPDATES OR INFORMATION REQUESTED FROM STAFF? NONE. OKAY. ANY POSSIBLE ITEMS YOU'D LIKE TO PLACE ON THE FUTURE AGENDA? YES, MA'AM. YES. I DON'T KNOW IF I NEED TO BE ON THE AGENDA OR IN OUR WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS WITH COUNSEL, UM, OUR LIAISON POSITIONS AND MAYBE DOING A BRIEF SUMMARY OR A COUPLE OF SENTENCES ON THOSE THAT WE DON'T, YOU KNOW, THAT ARE KIND OF NOT, NOT PLANNING AND ZONING IN EDC, MORE LIKE HISTORICAL, UH, ANIMAL ADVISORY SO THAT AS LIAISONS, THE OTHER COUNCIL KNOWS WHAT'S GOING ON AND GIVING THEM LIKE A MINI REPORT AND IT WILL GO STRAIGHT TO, I THINK CITY SECRETARY AND THEN THEY WOULD DIS DISSEMINATE IT OUT TO THE REST OF COUNCIL. OKAY. LET'S PUT THAT AS A WORKUP WORKSHOP OPTION. SURE. OKAY. ANY OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS? NO, JUST TO CLARIFY, YOU'RE SAYING THAT THEY PROVIDE WRITTEN REPORTS TO THE CITY? UH, JUST A COUPLE OF SENTENCES. I KNOW WHEN I TALKED TO ANIMAL ADVISORY THEY SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE SOMETHING FOR ME TO GIVE, TO PROVIDE TO COUNSEL BASED ON OUR MEETING. GOT IT. OKAY. WE WILL HOLD OFF ON DISCUSSION ON THAT ONE BECAUSE SOME OF THEM ARE ACTUALLY PROVIDED REPORTS BY A STAFF. YEAH. SO WE'LL, WE'LL HAVE THAT DISCUSSION. ALRIGHT, MR. MAYOR? YES. SORRY. UH, IS THERE A WAY THAT WE CAN POSSIBLY AT THE NEXT MEETING HAVE A, A CLOSED SESSION TO KIND OF RE UM, GO OVER THE, UH, REVIEW FOR THE CITY MANAGER, SEE IF WE HAVE ANY PROGRESS AND HAVE SOMETHING IN PLACE? I THINK THOSE ARE SCHEDULED [04:55:01] IN JULY, IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN. I THINK HIS REVIEW IN JULY, BUT WE, UM, I'M NOT SURE WE HAD AN EXACT DOCUMENT TO USE. REVIEW WAS SCHEDULED IN JULY. I THINK WHAT HE'S SAYING IS FOR US TO MAKE PROGRESS ON HOW WE WERE GOING TO SCORE HIM. YES, THAT'S RIGHT. TO GET WITH OUR CITY ATTORNEY ON THAT ONE FOR CLOSED SESSION. OKAY. I THINK IT WOULD BE FOR, WE'RE BOTH, UH, CITY MANAGERS AND CITY SECRETARY. OKAY. ALRIGHT. ANY OTHERS? ALRIGHT. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY COUNCIL MEMBERS. MAYOR PRO TE MACALUSO, UH, HAD THE HONOR OF GOING TO THE EMS BANQUET. UM, GOT TO MEET A LOT OF THE, UH, EMS PERSONNEL THAT I HAVEN'T AND, UH, JUST IT WAS A, IT WAS A GOOD TIME. COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS? NOTHING TONIGHT, SIR. COUNCIL MEMBER WATSON, NOTHING AT THIS TIME. COUNCIL MEMBER GIBSON, NOTHING AT THIS TIME. COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO TO THE ACOG ELECTED OFFICIALS, UH, WORKSHOP ON, ON FRIDAY. SAW SOME OLD FACES. MICHAEL CARPENTER. UH, COUNTY COMMISSIONER, UH, MICHAEL CARPENTER. BUT, UH, I LEARNED A LOT, ESPECIALLY FROM ALLISON HAYWARD , COUNCIL MEMBER HAYWARD. HMM. UH, . I DON'T KNOW HOW TO GO AFTER THAT ONE. UM, I ATTENDED THE ANIMAL ADVISORY, UH, BOARD MEETING, UM, AND THE AMPO RESILIENCY STUDY OVERSIGHT, UH, COMMITTEE MEETING. I SIT ON THAT COMMITTEE FOR NORTHEASTERN PARTNERSHIP AND SO WE HAD A MEETING, IT WAS OUR OVERSIGHT STUDY AND THEN I DID THE ACOG ELECTED OFFICIALS MEETING WITH COUNCIL MEMBER WESTBROOK, AND I GUESS I TAUGHT HIM SOMETHING. ALRIGHT. COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN. NOTHING. I, ALRIGHT. THE TIME IS NOW 1122. PLEASE STAND. ADJOURN. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.