[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:03]
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.THIS IS THE MARCH 5TH, 2025 MEETING OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
[2. SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED]
NUMBER TWO IS SEAT AND ALTERNATE.WE HAVE COMMISSIONER WALLACE WITH US THIS EVENING.
ITEM NUMBER THREE IS HEARING OF RESIDENTS.
UH, DID ANYBODY SIGN UP TO, UH, FOR THE CIAC MEETING? NO, NOBODY.
[4. CONSENT AGENDA:]
RIGHT.UH, ITEM NUMBER FOUR IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA.
WE HAVE A SINGLE ITEM ON THAT AGENDA THIS EVENING.
ITEM FOUR A ARE THE MINUTES FROM THE JANUARY 22ND, 2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING.
THERE'S NO DISCUSSION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
SO DO WE NEED TO PULL THIS FOR DISCUSSION? ANYBODY? ALRIGHT, THEN IF I COULD HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, PLEASE.
I'D HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. WALLACE.
I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
WE'LL START DOWN HERE AT THIS END.
THAT WAS THE SINGLE ITEM OF BUSINESS FOR THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE THIS EVENING.
SHORN, I THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO COME SIT WITH US FOR A FEW MINUTES.
I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE GREAT, BUT YOU KNOW, ALL
SO, THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THAT MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 6 0 2 AND AT SIX OH TWO.
I WILL CALL THE, CALL THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO MEET, MEETING TO ORDER.
THIS IS THE MARCH 20, MARCH 5TH, 2025, REGULAR MEETING OF THE SHE'S PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
ITEM NUMBER TWO IS SEAT AN ALTERNATE AND HE HASN'T MOVED, SO I GUESS HE'S GONNA STAY.
ITEM NUMBER THREE, HEARING A RESIDENCE.
ANYBODY SIGN UP? NOBODY SIGNED UP HERE EITHER.
ITEM NUMBER FOUR, ONCE AGAIN IS OUR CONSENT AGENDA.
AND WE ONCE AGAIN HAVE A SINGLE ITEM.
ITEM FOUR A ARE THE MINUTES FOR THE FEBRUARY 5TH, 2025 REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
THESE MINUTES NEED TO BE PULLED FOR DISCUSSION.
ANYONE, IF NOT, CAN I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA? SO MOVED.
ALL RIGHT, WE GOT A, WE GOT A THING GOING HERE.
SO I HAVE A, A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA FROM, UH, COMMISSIONER WALLACE AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CARBONE, THERE'S NO DISCUSSION, SO PLEASE RECORD YOUR VOTES.
[A. PLZC20250040 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 20 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE), Agricultural District (AD), and Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6), generally located approximately 4,800 feet east of the intersection of FM 1518 and Lower Seguin Road, known as 12816 Lower Seguin Rd and 12746 Lower Seguin Road, and more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers 310027, 310026, and 310028, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.]
NUMBER FIVE, A PUBLIC HEARING.THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO ZONE CHANGE REQUEST AND RELAS.
WITHIN THIS AGENDA, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE OPEN TO RECEIVE A REPORT FROM STAFF, THE APPLICANT, THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, AND ANY OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS UPON COMPLETION.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CLOSED.
THE COMMISSION WILL DISCUSS AND CONSIDER THE APPLICATION AND MAY REQUEST
[00:05:01]
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF OR THE APPLICANT IF REQUIRED.AFTER DELIBERATION, THE COMMISSION IS ASKED TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE FOLLOWING REQUEST AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL IF NECESSARY.
UM, FOR ANY OF YOU THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN THROUGH THIS PROCESS BEFORE, LET ME JUST EXPLAIN IT REAL QUICK.
UH, WE HAVE, UH, TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS THIS EVENING, AND EACH PUBLIC HEARING WILL START WITH A PRESENTATION BY STAFF WHEN STAFF IS FINISHED, THE APPLICANT, IF, IF, IF THEY WANT, UH, HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE AN, UM, A PRESENTATION.
AND THEN AT THAT POINT I WILL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
WE WILL THEN, UH, WHEN EVERYBODY'S HAD THEIR, HAD THEIR SAY, WE'LL CLOSE PUBLIC INPUT AND THE COMMISSION WILL DISCUSS IT.
UH, ONCE I CLOSE THE PUBLIC, UH, THE OPEN, THE, ONCE I CLOSE THE FLOOR TO PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMENT, THAT'S IT.
SO WE'RE GONNA START WITH FIVE A-P-L-Z-C 20 25 0 0 3 2, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON A REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.4 ACRES OF LAND FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R TWO TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R SIX, KNOWN AS 3 0 5 AVIATION AVENUE, MORE SPECIFICALLY KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY.
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 7 4 1 6 5.
CITY OF CHURCH, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS FLOOR IS YOURS.
A PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE TO R SIX IN AVIATION HEIGHTS.
HERE'S THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OUTLINED IN YELLOW.
THIS IS OUR BEAUTIFUL BASEBALL FIELD IN PICK PARK.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R TWO.
IT IS UNDEVELOPED, SO THERE IS NOTHING ON THE PROPERTY RIGHT NOW.
IT IS APPROXIMATELY 0.4 ACRES AND IT IS ALSO KNOWN AS AVIATION HEIGHTS LOT 61 BLOCK 24.
IT IS SURROUNDED BY OTHER PROPERTIES WITHIN AVIATION HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION AND THEY ARE ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R TWO.
WE HAVE AN OPEN SPACE TO THE SOUTH.
AGAIN, WE HAVE AVIATION AVENUE, AND AGAIN, THEY'RE SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES.
SO WE SENT OUT 27 PUBLIC NOTICES ON FEBRUARY 19TH, AND WE HAVE RECEIVED THREE IN OPPOSITION.
UM, AND WE WILL BE POSTING A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IN THE SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL HEARING, AND THE APPLICANT PLACED A SIGN OUTSIDE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
SO AGAIN, JUST GIVING SOME BACKGROUND, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO GO FROM R TWO TO R SIX ON THE 0.4 ACRE PROPERTY.
AND AS SOME OF YOU MIGHT KNOW, AVIATION HEIGHTS IS ONE OF THE OLDEST SUBDIVISIONS WE HAVE HERE IN SHORT.
SO THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF THAT SUBDIVISION.
AND THE PROPERTY WE'RE DISCUSSING TODAY IS OUTLINED IN RED.
SO YOU CAN KIND OF SEE HOW A LOT OF THESE LOTS WERE SIGNIFICANTLY SMALLER.
BUT YOU'LL SEE HERE, UM, DIRECTLY FROM THAT REPLANT DONE FROM THAT PROPERTY IN 2019, THEY COMBINED LOTS, 44, 45, 46, 47, AND 48, AND A PORTION OF 43 TO MAKE LOT 61 WHAT IT IS TODAY.
BUT THAT ONLY O GOES FURTHER TO SHOW YOU THAT THE PARCEL ADJACENT TO IT THAT HAS A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IS ACTUALLY MADE UP OF TWO LOTS PLUS THE OTHER HALF OF 43.
SO IT'S A VERY UNIQUE SUBDIVISION.
UM, AND IT'S ESSENTIALLY A LOT OF THESE LOTS ARE MADE UP OF MULTIPLE LOTS WITHIN THAT ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION.
SO AGAIN, THE APPLICANT, UH, CURRENTLY HAS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R TWO ZONING, WHICH, UH, REQUIRES 70 BY ONE 20, UM, MINIMUM LOT WITHIN DEPTH, AND THEY'RE REQUESTING R SIX 60 BY ONE 20.
UM, PER THE LETTER OF INTENT, THE APPLICANT HAS ENOUGH SPACE ESSENTIALLY TO SPLIT THE LOT IN HALF AND PILL TWO SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND THEY'RE TRYING TO BUILD A HOME FOR THEMSELVES AND ESSENTIALLY, UH, FOR THEIR PARENTS.
SO THAT'S THE REASON FOR THIS REZONE TODAY.
AND AGAIN, WHEN WE LOOK AT ZONE CHANGES, WE LOOK AT UDC, SECTION 2154 D FOR TOWARDS THE CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL AND WHETHER THIS PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE IMPLEMENTS THE POLICIES OF THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLAN OR ANY OTHER APPLICABLE ADOPTED PLANS.
SO THIS WHOLE AREA WITHIN THE AVIATION SUBDIVISION IS DESIGNATED AS COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND AGAIN, IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL SUPPORTING LAND USES, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, KIND OF, YOU KNOW, BUILDING THAT NEIGHBORHOOD AND ALL THE USES THAT WE NEED WITHIN THAT.
UM, IT'S COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIALS BEING PROPOSED.
AND THE PROPOSED LAND USES IN ZONING DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS THAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TONIGHT MEET THE
[00:10:01]
INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND POLICIES.SO TWO, WHETHER THE ZONE CHANGE PROMOTES HEALTH SAFETY IN GENERAL WHILE FELICITY.
SO THE USES ALLOWED IN R SIX ARE ALSO ALLOWED IN R TWO.
AND AGAIN, DUE TO THE UNIQUE NATURE OF THE AVIATION HEIGHT SUBDIVISION, A LOT OF THESE LOTS ARE ACTUALLY, UM, KIND OF ALREADY COMPLYING WITH THAT R SIX, UM, LOT WITHIN DEATH AND REQUIREMENTS.
SO THREE, WHETHER THE USE IS PERMITTED BY THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL BE CONSISTENT AND APPROPRIATE WITH EXISTING USES IN THE MEDIA AREA.
AGAIN, IT'S THE AVIATION HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION.
UM, PROPERTIES WITHIN THE AVIATION HEIGHTS ARE ZONED R TWO AND THEY MAY ACTUALLY MEET THE DI.
THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF OTHER ZONING DISTRICTS AND R SIX AND R TWO ARE BOTH INTENDED FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITH THINGS LIKE SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, AND PARKS TO CREATE THAT BASIC NEIGHBORHOOD UNIT.
AND FOUR, UH, SHIRTS, FIRE EMS AND POLICE HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED OF THIS ZONE CHANGE AND HAVE NO OBJECTION.
AND A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE WAS MAILED TO S-E-U-C-I-S-D AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY ADDITIONAL CRITERIA FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OR CITY COUNCIL.
WITH ALL THAT BEING SAID, DUE TO THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT R SIX, MEANING THE 10 OF COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE DESIGNATION AND COMPATIBILITY WITH EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD AT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLZC 2 25 0 0 3 2.
AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR THEM.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO MAKE A PRESENTATION? NOT REQUIRED.
IT IS, UH, 6:11 PM I'LL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR PUBLIC INPUT.
ANYONE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS SUBJECT IS WELCOME TO STEP FORWARD TO THE PODIUM.
NOBODY, SO NOBODY THAT REPLIED IN OPPOSITION CAME TO THE MEETING TONIGHT, I GUESS, HUH? NO.
UH, COMMISSIONERS DAISY, COULD YOU PUT THE, UM, COULD YOU PUT, UH, ONE OF THE DIAGRAMS UP THERE? UM, THAT ONE WILL DO, YES.
I GOT SOME, OH, GO AHEAD, JOHN.
YOU SENT OUT NOTICES THAT BASICALLY THAT THEY WANNA PUT A HOUSE FOR THEM AND THEIR PARENTS ON THERE.
I'M SURE THEY KNEW THAT ALREADY AND THREE PEOPLE OPPOSED IT.
UM, IT'S NOT LIKE THEY'RE BUYING, BUYING IT AND PUTTING A BIG CHURCH UP OR A DAYCARE CENTER.
IT'S JUST TWO HOUSES ON A LOT THAT CAN ACTUALLY FIT THEM.
IS THERE? HEY, SO, UM, IS THERE A REASON WHAT, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THESE LOTS THAT ARE ZONED ARE TO MEET THAT MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE? LIKE A, ALL OF THESE ARE SO SPLIT UP.
YEAH, I CANNOT PROVIDE YOU AN ACCURATE NUMBER AT THIS THIS TIME.
I MEAN, IT JUST LIKE, IT, IT JUST SEEMS THAT THE, ANYWAY, IT JUST SEEMS LIKE THE OVERALL ZONING MIGHT BE INAPPROPRIATE FOR A LOT IF WE'RE MANDATING 8,200 SQUARE FEET AND WE'RE HAVING TO REZONE TO, I MEAN, BOTH OF THESE LOTS ARE, LIKE, IF YOU LOOK AT THE ONES ACROSS THE STREET, THEY SEEM TO BE THE EXACT SAME SIZE OF WHAT THEY WOULD PROBABLY PROPOSE, BUT THEY'RE ZONED R TWO.
SO A LOT OF THESE, UM, ESSENTIALLY PARCELS THAT WERE CREATED AT THE COUNTY, IF YOU CLICK ON THEM, THEY'RE EITHER THREE OR FOUR LOTS COMBINED, FIVE LOTS COMBINED.
IT'S JUST DEPENDS ON HOW MANY THEY BOUGHT BACK IN THE DAY.
YEAH, I'M NOT, NOT SURE WHY THIS IS ALL ZONED R TWO, OTHER THAN THAT PROBABLY SEEMED APPROPRIATE WHEN THE ZONING WAS APPLIED.
UM, I DID A LITTLE RESEARCH BASICALLY, I, I, I BROUGHT UP GOOGLE EARTH AND THEIR MEASUREMENT TOOL AND I TRIED TO MEASURE SOME OF THESE LOTS.
AND, UM, LOOKING AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH, IF YOU GO TO THE RIGHT TOWARDS SHEZ PARKWAY, UM, THERE'S A COUPLE THERE, PARTICULARLY THE, THE SECOND ONE UP THAT IS 75 FEET FRONTAGE.
IT'S 75 BY A HUNDRED AND SOMETHING CERTAINLY RR TWO.
UM, YOU GO A COUPLE, COUPLE OF DOORS THE OTHER WAY AND, AND YOU GET DOWN INTO THE SIXTIES.
I DON'T, I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THE EXACT NUMBER WAS, UM, WHICH IS R SIX.
[00:15:01]
UM, AND, UH, I THINK IN READING OUR BRIEF, THE FRONTAGE ON THIS PROPERTY IS 137 AND A HALF FEET.IF YOU, IF, IF HE WERE TO DIVIDE IT STRAIGHT DOWN THE MIDDLE, WHAT IS THAT? 68? NOT QUITE 69 FEET.
NOW, I DON'T KNOW, UH, AGAIN, HE, THE, THE LETTER OF INTENT SAID HE WANTED TO SPLIT IT AND BUILD TWO HOUSES.
IS HE GONNA SPLIT IT DOWN THE MIDDLE? SHAKING HIS HEAD OUT THERE? OKAY.
SO HE'LL, HE'LL CREATE TWO EQUAL LOTS OF ABOUT 69 BY ONE 20 SOMETHING.
WHICH IS NOT QUITE R TWO, BUT IT'S A REAL HIGH R SIX.
SO NOW CAN THAT BE MADE OF A CONDITION? CAN WE, SO THAT WE ENSURE THAT IT GETS SPLIT EVENLY OR CAN WE DO THAT? OR IS THAT NOT NOT PART OF THE AUTHORITY OR, SO I WOULD SAY WE SHOULD, WE SHOULD PROBABLY STAY AWAY FROM THAT ULTIMATELY.
RIGHT? IF, IF THE COMMISSION FEELS THAT R SIX IS APPROPRIATE, YOU KNOW THAT THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH IS GONNA BE 60 FEET.
SO THEORETICALLY HE, HE CAN'T SUBDIVIDE IT INTO MORE THAN TWO LOTS.
HE DOESN'T HAVE ENOUGH FORAGE.
BUT IT COULD BE ONE COULD BE 60 AND THE OTHER ONE COULD BE 70.
BUT I SAW THE SAME THING THAT I THINK ALL OF YOU SAW WHEN, WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS AND, AND DAISY POINTED IT OUT, THAT, UH, SOME OF THE LOTS CERTAINLY FIT R TWO AND SOME OF THEM DON'T.
ANYBODY, UM, RICHARD? YEAH, GO AHEAD.
WHAT WAS THE DATE OF THE ORIGINAL PLAQUE? THAT OTHER ONE YOU HAD UP THERE? THE ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL? THAT ONE.
IS THERE A DATE ON THERE? 59? YEAH, RIGHT UP THERE AT THE TOP.
YEAH, IT WAS DRAWN ON PENCIL
THAT'S RIGHT AFTER MY MOM, WHY WE MOVED INTO OUR NEW HOUSE.
THIS IS, UH, THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL AND, UM, WE CAN APPROVE, WE CAN DENY WELL, WE CAN'T, WE, WE CAN RECOMMEND APPROVAL, WE CAN RECOMMEND DENIAL.
SO I RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLZC 2 0 2 5 0 0 3 2 AS WRITTEN.
RICHARD STARTED TO SPEAK AND IT GOT MY ATTENTION.
SO WHAT, WHAT NO, YOU GO AHEAD.
I JUST, I JUST, I MISSED THE FIRST PART OF YOUR MOTION.
I HAVE A, UH, A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CARBONE.
IT WAS SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HECTOR TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PZC 2 25 0 0 32.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALRIGHT.
CAN YOU PUBLISH THAT PLEASE? WE HAVE SIX IN FAVOR.
NONE OPPOSED THAT MOTION PASSES.
[B. PLZC20250017 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 3.5 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to General Business District- II (GB-2), generally located 1,700 feet west of the intersection of IH-10 E Access Road and Trainer Hale Road, more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 339775, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.]
OKAY, ITEM NUMBER FIVE B IS ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING.E-L-U-D-C 20 25 0 0 3 5 CONDUCTED A PUBLIC HEARING WORKSHOP IN DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON AMENDMENTS TO PART THREE OF THE SHIRT'S.
CODE OF ORDINANCES, UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE FIVE, SECTION 21.5 0.4 ZONING CHANGE.
THIS IS PL UDC 2 0 2 5 0 0 3 5.
SO STAFF HAS BROUGHT FORWARD THESE AMENDMENTS TO HELP ALIGN THE UDC WITH RECENT CHANGES IN THE, UH, CITY CHARTER.
UH, THIS HAS TO DO WITH SPECIFICALLY, UM, SECTION 21 5 4.
THIS IS THE ZONING CHANGE SECTION IN THE UDC AND THE SUBSECTION THAT WE ARE PROPOSING AMENDMENTS TO IS, UH, E FOUR IN REGARDS TO THE PROTEST VOTE AND HOW WE COUNT IT.
UM, AND AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS A
[00:20:01]
DIRECT RESULT OF CITY CHARTER AMENDMENTS THAT WERE APPROVED ON NOVEMBER 5TH, 2024 BY SHIRTZ VOTERS.AND IN THAT CHARTER AMENDMENT, BASICALLY THE ORDINANCES FOR ZONE CHANGES, UH, WENT FROM, UH, TWO HEARINGS TO ONE.
SO NOW WE ONLY HAVE ONE HEARING.
SO THE PREVIOUS CHARTER REQUIRED TWO, AND SO THAT REQUIRES SOME UPDATING IN SOME OF OUR LANGUAGE.
AND SO THIS IS THE EXISTING SECTION OF THE UDC WITH RED LINES.
UM, AS YOU CAN SEE, THAT HAS A FIRST READING AND THEN A SECOND READING SECTION WHERE WE DON'T REALLY NEED THE SECOND READING ANYMORE.
SO WE'VE MADE SOME EDITS HERE.
WE GOT RID OF THE SECOND READING PART AND WE GOT RID OF, UH, SUBSECTION C THAT YOU SEE THERE ABOUT HOW TO COUNT BETWEEN FIRST AND SECOND.
ALL, ALL OF IT'S JUST KIND OF, IT NO LONGER APPLIES ANYMORE.
SO WE'VE, UH, WE'VE BASICALLY WHITTLED THIS DOWN INTO A SMALLER SECTION HERE THAT BASICALLY SAYS, UH, WHICH WAS ALREADY THERE BEFORE.
BUT BASICALLY WHEN YOU, YOU KNOW, THE PROTEST VOTE HAS TO BE COUNTED ON THE RECEIVED ON THE FRIDAY BEFORE, UH, CONSIDERATION FROM CITY COUNCIL.
SO GOING FROM ONE TO TWO, UH, AND IN PRACTICE YOU'LL SEE THESE ON.
SO THIS IS THE, UH, A REPLY FORM HERE YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN, AND IN THE BOTTOM IS WHERE SOME OF THAT LANGUAGE IS.
AND THE ONE UP HERE ON THE TOP LEFT OF YOUR SCREEN, YOU'LL SEE IT SAYS THE FRIDAY BEFORE EACH READING.
AND THEN WE JUST CHANGE THAT ALSO IN PRACTICE TO FRIDAY BEFORE CONSIDERATION.
SO IT JUST KIND OF CHANGES IN, IN OUR PROTEST FORM AS WELL.
SO, UH, WHEN EVALUATING UDC AMENDMENT STAFF USES UDC SECTION 21 5 47 D UH, NUMBER ONE, THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, THE HEALTH SAFETY, GENERAL WELFARE OF THE CITY.
SO STAFF IS JUST TAKING STEPS TO ENSURE THE WELLBEING OF HIS RESIDENTS BY MAKING ITS DEVELOPMENT CODE MORE CLEAR AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND.
AND ALSO ALIGNING WITH CITY CHARTERS.
UH, NUMBER TWO, THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE GOALS, OBJECTION AND POLICIES OF THIS UDC.
SO THE CHANGE IN THE CHARTER INDICATES A NEW POLICY DIRECTION.
SO UPDATING THE UDC IS CREATING THAT CONSISTENCY.
UH, NUMBER THREE, THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT CORRECTS AN ERROR, MEETS THE CHALLENGE OF CHANGE CONDITIONS OR IN RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN STATE LAW.
THESE AMENDMENTS ARE A DIRECT RESPONSES TO THE CHARTER AMENDMENTS, AS I'VE, UH, ALREADY SAID, AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH ARE DEEMED RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT.
SO NO OTHER ADDITIONAL FACTORS HAVE BEEN DEEMED RELEVANT AT THIS TIME, BUT THIS PUBLIC HEARING DOES PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY TO INTRODUCE ANY ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS.
SO STAFF IS, UH, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PUDC 2 0 2 5 0 3 5.
UH, THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IT IS 6 22.
ANYONE WISHING TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THIS SUBJECT IS WELCOME TO STEP FORWARD.
NOBODY, NOBODY LIKES US ANYMORE.
IT'S STILL 8 22 AND PUBLIC INPUT IS CLOSED.
COMMISSIONERS QUAL QUESTIONS, DISCUSSION? PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.
ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
WE CAN APPROVE, WE CAN DO, WE CAN RECOMMEND APPROVAL, DENIAL, OR APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS.
MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF P-L-U-D-C 2 0 2 5 0 0 3 5.
SECOND, ALL I HAVE A, UH, MOTION TO APPROVE OR RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF P-L-U-D-C-C 2 25 0 0 3 5 FROM COMMISSIONER WALLACE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARONE.
ANY FURTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS, PLEASE RECORD YOUR VOTE.
ALRIGHT, I HAVE SIX VOTES IF YOU'LL PUBLISH THAT, PLEASE.
NONE OPPOSED THAT MOTION PASSES.
ITEM NUMBER SIX, INDIVIDUAL OR ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? WE HAD ONE, BUT IT APPEARS THAT'S BEEN WITHDRAWN.
THANK YOU FOLKS FOR COMING BY.
DID YOU, DID YOU COME BY FOR A PARTICULAR REASON OR, OKAY.
YEAH, I THOUGHT IT WAS GONNA BE.
SO THAT, SO, UM, YEAH, I'LL JUST, SIX DAYS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
[00:25:01]
LAST MEETING WE HAD.WE BROUGHT FORWARD A UDC AMENDMENT.
UM, IT HAD TWO DIFFERENT AMENDMENTS.
WE WITHDREW THIS APPLICATION AND WE BROUGHT FORWARD THE ZONING CHANGE ONE THAT Y'ALL JUST HEARD.
UH, AND THE OTHER ONE WAS REGARDING PRE-DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICTS.
WE ARE GONNA REVISIT THAT AT A LATER TIME.
[A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda]
SEVEN REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS.REQUEST BY COMMISSIONERS TO PLACE ITEMS ON A FUTURE PLANNING ZONING AGENDA.
[B. Announcements by Commissioners City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended]
ANNOUNCEMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS? ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING? ONE, UH, COMMISSIONER BRO HAS ONE.UH, FRIDAY AND MONDAY AND YESTERDAY I MADE A VISIT TO THE, UH, THE NOT SO NEW SOUTH SHIRTS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.
UH, IT'S UP AND RUNNING AND THE SHIRTS, THE NEW SHIRTS, UH, LIFT STATION ON I 10 THAT IS GONNA DELIVER THE WASTEWATER FROM CROSS MINE AND ALL THE OTHER AREAS DOWN THERE SOUTH OF, UH, SCHAFER ROAD.
UM, THAT SYSTEM IS UP AND RUNNING AND PROVIDING THE WASTEWATER TO THE NEW SEWER PLANT.
SO AFTER A COUPLE OF WEEKS OF, UH, HOPEFULLY SUCCESSFUL OPERATION, I GUESS, I DON'T KNOW IF THE CITY'S GONNA MAKE A, AN ANNOUNCEMENT THAT IT'S UP AND RUNNING.
AND I WOULD SAY FROM A PLANNING AND ZONING STANDPOINT, GET READY BECAUSE THE APPLICATIONS ARE GONNA START ROLLING IN, I THINK ONCE WORD GETS OUT THAT THAT WASTEWATER SYSTEM IS UP AND RUNNING.
ANYBODY ELSE? UH, WHERE AM I HERE? I'M GETTING, GETTING LOST ALREADY.
[C. Announcements by City Staff. City and community events attended and to be attended.]
BY CITY STAFF.UM, THIS SATURDAY IS CLEAN THE CREEK, UH, PUT ON BY NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, WHICH IS PART OF PLANNING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
SO IF YOU WANNA COME AND VOLUNTEER AND HANG OUT WITH YOUR PLANNING STAFF, UM, WE'LL BE OUT THERE CLEANING THE CREEK.
UH, YOU CAN FIND INFORMATION ON SHIRTS.COM IF YOU JUST SEARCH, CLEAN THE CREEK, BUT IT'S THIS SATURDAY FROM EIGHT 30 TO 11.
[A. Current Projects and City Council Status Update ]
RIGHT.ITEM A, ITEM NUMBER EIGHT IS THE INFORMATION'S AVAILABLE IN OUR PACKETS ABOUT, UH, THE STATUS OF OUR VARIOUS, UH, CURRENT PROJECTS AND CITY COUNCIL STATUS.
ALTHOUGH I THINK THEY TOOK, I HAVEN'T WATCHED THE MEETING YET, BUT THERE WERE TWO OR THREE OF 'EM ON THE MEETING LAST NIGHT, SO, UH, THERE MAY BE SOME UPDATES TO THAT.
OKAY, ITEM NUMBER NINE, IT IS 6 27 AND THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED.